bosley
- 20 Feb 2004 09:34
garyble
- 13 Nov 2005 19:46
- 12724 of 27111
trionic filter seems to have been around for at least 3 years:
http://www.trdrp.org/Docs/NCTOH%20New%20Products%20Handout.pdf#search='trionic%20filter%20cigarette'
garyble
- 13 Nov 2005 19:47
- 12725 of 27111
bosley
- 13 Nov 2005 19:49
- 12726 of 27111
seo did make a big deal of the toxins found in smokers lungs from the current filters and that some of these toxins arn't in the starch filturds, (rispeck ii), but i agree that trying to push a safe ciggie is daft. much better to push the environmental angle which nobody can argue with, dissovles to water in 60 days, can only be beneficial.
garyble
- 13 Nov 2005 19:51
- 12727 of 27111
Cellulose acetate appears to be one of the three components within the Trionic filter, so still scope for starch based material within these filters.
blinger
- 13 Nov 2005 19:55
- 12728 of 27111
Don`t hold your breath- oh and watch the SP tomorrow for the truth.
hewittalan6
- 13 Nov 2005 19:59
- 12729 of 27111
As I read the part you refer to, boz, the only point it seemed to be trying to make was that fibres of the filters find their way into your lungs and stay forever, whereas starch based ones would break down, therefore being less harmful, but I may have missed the bit about toxins.
garyble
- 13 Nov 2005 20:03
- 12730 of 27111
Blinger,
Curious, and what do you predict will happen tomorrow, and what would the "truth" be?
Just to be absolutely sure we/I understand exactly what you mean.
bosley
- 13 Nov 2005 20:15
- 12731 of 27111
apologies, alan. you are correct. it is just filters getting into lungs, not toxins. i misremembered it.
see you in a bit, going for a fag.
blinger
- 13 Nov 2005 20:20
- 12732 of 27111
garbyle.
I think the price will crash,
perhaps you don`t- its all in the lap of the Goods (no spelling mistake)
lol!!!!!!
predateur
- 13 Nov 2005 20:26
- 12733 of 27111
Crash is a strong word.
Blinger, have you shorted.
If not, why not.
Let us have a direct answer, please.
garyble
- 13 Nov 2005 21:10
- 12734 of 27111
Thanks Blinger,
I certainly hope it doesn't as I added another 335k on Thursday. Well you know what they say about a fool and his money!!
blinger
- 13 Nov 2005 21:29
- 12735 of 27111
OH I do garbyle , we all do,fools etc.
Can we confirm you added another 335,000 SEO???????????
What time was the trade, did I mis it?
Predateur - guess which way I am invested, whatever ---its my business -ok?
garyble
- 13 Nov 2005 21:37
- 12736 of 27111
Blinger,
If you really must know: 10/11/05 @ 10:13, 335k.
Not sure what purpose it serves you though.
garyble
- 13 Nov 2005 21:40
- 12737 of 27111
I had halved my holding during the slide, but decided to top up as I believe we're now due a steady climb again.
blinger
- 13 Nov 2005 22:08
- 12738 of 27111
Well done ,halved your holding.
At least you listened to common sense , away from that dreadful ramping web-site, `foulyerboots`, amazing losers!!!
I have never seen such goings on where the management can admit to holding a share, and ban people who are anti it--- still there is a first for everything I guess.
SEO have to fall, its too high for the market, simple as that
Goodnight.
bosley
- 14 Nov 2005 09:22
- 12739 of 27111
morning. looks like another humdinger of a day in store.
hewittalan6
- 14 Nov 2005 09:33
- 12740 of 27111
Morning, Boz.
I don't think I can stand the excitement.
Now wheres that Prozac?
Alan
garyble
- 14 Nov 2005 10:27
- 12741 of 27111
Blinger,
I see where you're coming from, and although I do not agree, I appreciate your perspective.
bhunt1910
- 14 Nov 2005 11:30
- 12742 of 27111
anyone fancy the chances of an RNS tomorrow
- end of 30 day trial?
- FDA approval?
- pre close statement ?
- agreement with ??
Well I am pretty bored - might have to go and do some decorating otherwise
baza
hewittalan6
- 14 Nov 2005 11:38
- 12743 of 27111
Pure guesswork here Baza, but I don't fancy an RNS for some time yet. :-(