bosley
- 20 Feb 2004 09:34
Red Erik
- 14 Nov 2005 20:14
- 12753 of 27111
looking forward to the next 2 weeks several rns coming 50p by year end
stockdog
- 14 Nov 2005 20:15
- 12754 of 27111
zscrooge - you play for 10baggers, you lose some - high stakes / some large losses, hopefully more larger gains. PM1's view of EVS being used to imply similar likelihood of SEO going belly up is Socrates' deliberate sophistry about cats and nine lives in a different form.
Who cares what happened to EVS? Who cares (with great respect) waht Paul thought of them. He was wrong. Doesn't mean he's wrong (or right) about SEO.
SEO is not out of the woods yet, but seems to have stabilised after a substantial fall. Its current symmetrical triangle formation could go either way. However, on fundamentals, it has enough cash to keep it going until it starts generating cashflow which I believe it will in plenty in due course. I may be wrong, but there is more evidence for than against currently and the rewards, if we are right, are substantial. That's why the price is what it is now and may increase later. If we new the future, there would be no market, just NPV based on DCF.
QED
sd
Red Erik
- 14 Nov 2005 20:18
- 12755 of 27111
are evs bust ? i see they are suspended which does not mean bust several companies in the same situation are now trading at much higer levels qxl for example keep it real please
blinger
- 14 Nov 2005 20:20
- 12756 of 27111
PM is a ramper, nothing more, and fundamentally much less-avoid!!!!
==========
paulmasterson1 - 24 Sep 2005 13:59 - 1451 of 1452
Hi All,
All the stocks I invest in are based ot the fact that over the next few years they will be ten baggers or better, EVS is exactly that.
============
Huge and massive guffaws!!!!!!!!!!
hewittalan6
- 14 Nov 2005 20:22
- 12757 of 27111
SD,
We actually had people on here yesterday, forecasting a crash for SEO today, so don't go upsetting them by saying it might rise after todays monumental destruction of the SP was so accurately called by them.
After all, ELO and XTC were better than UB40.
More wine please, waiter.
Alan
blinger
- 14 Nov 2005 20:24
- 12758 of 27111
So it went up then?
damn , missed that -should have close my short
ROTFFLMFAO!!!!!!!!!!
Geddoutahere
explosive
- 14 Nov 2005 20:26
- 12759 of 27111
Alan, monumental destruction of the sp... Thats abit strong don't you think, slight blip in my mind.
blinger
- 14 Nov 2005 20:28
- 12760 of 27111
Comstant dripping wears away stone. 8p soooon!!!!!!!!!!
bhunt1910
- 14 Nov 2005 20:28
- 12761 of 27111
I gather from the comments that ii or blinger are back - just ignore - they feed on your emails - whatever you say they have an answer and will just feed on it.
If you ignore them they whither and die
Baza
blinger
- 14 Nov 2005 20:31
- 12762 of 27111
bit like SEO is withering by a tick a day????
Argue the point, don`t blame the posters please!!!
explosive
- 14 Nov 2005 20:32
- 12763 of 27111
At 8p Bling I'd still be up....
hewittalan6
- 14 Nov 2005 20:32
- 12764 of 27111
Monumental destruction - I was being ironic. It was just that someone very firmly claimed that the price would crash TODAY. Not tomorrow, or the day after, but TODAY.
I was merely pointing out that even an intellect as supreme as theirs can get it wrong.
I get it wrong all the time, but I either don't make any wild claims or I say I have got it wrong.
Unfortunately I have that poster squelched now so I will not be able to read them admitting their mistake, but I am certain they will be big enough to do that.
Alan
explosive
- 14 Nov 2005 20:33
- 12765 of 27111
I just can't see it though.... Other way, yep thats it look the other way mate!!!! Up Up I think it'll go.....
explosive
- 14 Nov 2005 20:36
- 12766 of 27111
Alan, nice to see a real trader that admits we all make mistakes... I have had my share of losses but fortunatly have always remained up... Can't see any crashes coming though, well apart from that of the 's variety next year I'd say..
blinger
- 14 Nov 2005 20:37
- 12767 of 27111
at 8p you "would be up explosive"- why didn`t you cash in at 30p then?
Seems an obviuous point?
ps ignore hewtitalan- he has no shares.
explosive
- 14 Nov 2005 20:38
- 12768 of 27111
Agree with the wild claims also, rather reminds me of an old coal miner who to had too much to say....
blinger
- 14 Nov 2005 20:40
- 12769 of 27111
explosive
answer please?
hewittalan6
- 14 Nov 2005 20:40
- 12770 of 27111
I've made some disasters in my time, explosive.
If you could see the state of my portfolio in about July of this year you'd either cry or laugh. It was horrendous. In a period of about 2 weeks I made every single call wrong and lost about 15%.
Recovered now, and made one or two good calls recently, but I don't want to crow, cos that would garauntee I'd be wiped out in 48 hours.LOL
Alan
blinger
- 14 Nov 2005 20:42
- 12771 of 27111
hello explosive if you were in profit @ 8p, why did you not take the profit
No- conferring with hewtit` please, answer yourself--OVER!!!!
explosive
- 14 Nov 2005 20:42
- 12772 of 27111
If I'd had known the sp would fall this far then maybe I would have. But to answer your question then I guess the real reason is I thought the sp would keep going higher. I still do believe in this share.