NML is due its interrim results now, last year it was the 28th of this month.

They are setting up a new site to explore/research/analyse and all the equipment to do this should be on site now, and drilling should start soon, all this extra news should be covered in the interims.

does anyone have any further positive views on this company ??

stockdog..just a joke, sd, since I am a woman..! ...and I have the feeling you distrust what I post, for some reason.
As you may know , Minesite arrange quite frequent presentations, in London, and I'm told they are well worth attending for those who follow minex stocks.

no - I'd never have guessed. lol!

trust you more than many others, although when put in the position of personal vindication, sometimes less interesting and more confusing to those not involved in the squabble.

keep the information flowing - all of us sitting on losses need everything we can get to keep the faith.

sd

stockdog..happy to post what I can. Still trust the management to get it right eventually here! I know they are very keen to 'do a Petra'.
if you want to try their PR chap...he is gary@swithins.com
He obviously can't answer anything price-sensitive, but he is helpful with general enquiries.

can't believe people still believe in this one.

they promised 10000 carats per month, then stopped after they had announced production had started, failed to declare the grades found, in fact failed to declare they had found anything at all!!! and then announced temporary change of plan for 6 months!!!

i have heard word that they are being view in a very poor light by others in the industry...

and a placing must be close now???

caveat emptor is very applicable here !!!

I think caveat emptor is spiritually an anagram of empty excavator!

aimtrader.."i have heard word that they are being view in a very poor light by others in the industry... "
easy to say..can you give an example?

LOL!!!

it would appear very apt in the circumstances!!!

takahe,

an example, on a public bulletin board???

certainly not, sorry - but i can assure you it is true!!!

aimtrader...but it is good enough for you to post the general remark on a public bulletin board...interesting

takahe,

well thats what people do on these bulletin boards, surely???

you won't find people giving that sort of information away on sites such as this, you just have to read and digest all the available information, and make your own mind up...

not even a hint..?

ok

ask the company, not the pr guy, for an update of the current state of play in writing!!!

New Millennium Resources Ltd
06 September 2005

New Millennium Resources Ltd (the 'Company')

Re Director Shareholding

This announcement corrects the announcement of 22 April 2005 stating directors'
shareholdings. In that announcement David Johnston and Azizi Yom Ahmad were
incorrectly reported as holding 1,333,080 and 3,919,630 ordinary shares.

David Johnston held 1,883,080 ordinary shares on that date and still holds that
number, representing 1.1 per cent. of the Company's issued share capital.

Azizi Yom Ahmad held ordinary 6,919,630 shares on that date and still holds that
number, representing 3.9 per cent. of the Company's issued share capital.

So much for WendyD's claim that there was nothing wrong with the RNS on 22 April 2005. The company has now admitted that it WAS wrong.

Yet there is still an error with this RNS, as this one shows that both people concerned acquired more shares than was reported, but did not notify the market that this acquisition had occurred.

I refer you back to the figures from earlier this year:



You can see that the total holdings for Senator Johnston should have been 1,658,080, but now they are saying he holds 1,883,080. That means he acquired 225,000 shares and did not notify the market inbetween December and April.

Likewise, you can see that Dato Azizi Yom Ahmad should have 6,794,630, but now they are saying he holds 6,919,630 which means he acquired 125,000 extra shares without notifying the market between December and April.

IF YOU CAN NOT TRUST THE DIRECTORS TO REPORT THEIR SHARE TRANSFERS CORRECTLY UNDER THE REGULATIONS, HOW CAN YOU TRUST ANYTHING THEY TELL YOU REGARDING THE REST OF THE COMPANY?
This proves that the company did incorrectly report the holdings in April and that they have failed to notify additional share transfers.

What else have they 'forgotten' to tell you?!

The people on this board obviously do not want to face the fact that the directors DID fail to report their share transfers correctly, because it opens the possibility that other transfers have not been reported as well.

The figures below show the position at the moment:



You can see from these figures that 16,476,703 shares have been acquired as part of their personal holdings but these acquisitions have not reported to the market.

This immediately begs the question whether any other disposals or transfers have not been reported as well.

This will not change anything regarding the AIM because the outstanding complaint is that transfers were not reported and the company has proved that this is correct. So the company is holding their hands up that they DID fail to report the correct figures as required by the regulations. They did break the LSE rules.

Anom...I don't know why you are bothering to put so much effort into a share you say you don't have. All this time you have said the directors have been dumping shares when their holdings have now been confirmed the same. My advice is go and find another share to deramp...no one here is interested in you and ADVFN are not interested either and have told you to clear off...so buzzzzzzzzzzzz

Dyamite,

It begs the question why it's taken the company over four months to confirm what Anom said was incorrect at the time?

And who in their right mind would short a share at 2.5p BID?

Exactly Andy...why bother to go to al the effort Anom does at all...is he in his right mind?

I see Anom is spreading his version here...NML look like numpties for having typos in their figures, I quite agree. However, since the directors in question have MORE shares and have not sold, Anom's little conspiracy theories go out of the window. Why is he SO DESPERATE to bash yet another share he doesn't own?He has harangued people for months with all his ideas of 'mystery sellers' and 'directors selling' and have they..? Apparently not!

Dynamite - 06 Sep 2005 09:45 - 1295 of 1298
Anom...I don't know why you are bothering to put so much effort into a share you say you don't have. All this time you have said the directors have been dumping shares when their holdings have now been confirmed the same. My advice is go and find another share to deramp...no one here is interested in you and ADVFN are not interested either and have told you to clear off...so buzzzzzzzzzzzz

Firstly ADVFN have not told me to do anything, so that is a fabrication of your deluded mind.

Secondly, I never said the directors were selling I said that the directors declared figures were wrong. I suggested that if these figures are wrong, then the directors may have transfered or disposed of shares without telling the market. They did. So I have been proven 100% accurate

Thirdly, I said that the 'mystery' seller(s) has been dumping shares into the market. If you can't work out who the 'mystery' seller(s) are, then that is your problem, but there are only a few people who could be the candidates for the 'mystery' seller(s).

If you want to act the fool and be the patsy to someone out to take advantage of the shareholders, then that's up to you. But then don't blame us when we start laughing at your gullibility. If you are too stupid to fail to recognise when someone is taking advantage of you, you shouldn't have invested on the market. You would be better off giving all the money away to charities rather than lining the pockets of extremely wealthy people who are getting richer at your expense.