bosley
- 20 Feb 2004 09:34
driver
- 16 Nov 2005 18:16
- 12813 of 27111
I ask pm1 what the M&S deal had to do with SEO this is his reply.
NW and SEO make totally different products, they are working TOGETHER to get starch-based plastic onto the supermarket shelves, they are NOT in competition. Any deal for NW is a good sign that retailers are changing to starch-based plastic, but NW plastic has it's limitations, so those retailers will HAVE to buy from Stanelco for other starch-based food packaging. NW plastic breathes and is used for bread, pastries, confectionary etc. Stanelcos's plastic does not breathe and is used for hermetically sealing any food that is not affected by condensation(meat, fish, ready meals, cold meats, cheese, frozen, etc), and it is used for MAP packaging, where it is the ONLY plastic in the world that is Biodegradable AND made from sustainable resources AND seals with Greenseal without cross-linking of polymers, it is also has a better gas barrier than Polypropylene(used by WMT and other US retailers), and is cheaper than APET and PP
Ask Tony Ruane tony.ruane@asda.co.uk and you will find they do want Starpol, but there is a lot of work being done by the business leaders in assesing their requirement, then creating and signing the right deal. Just look at NW, it took a year for Wal-Mart to take PLA, but ASDA have already been testing Starpol for several months, so Starpol is already a long way into a deal making situation, and the 30 days was a gratuitous offer from Stanelco, who have a large number of other clients who want Starpol, and those deals will be along soon too
hewittalan6
- 16 Nov 2005 18:43
- 12814 of 27111
I hope hes right Driver. PM1 may have been somewhat over exuberant in his prognosis for this share, and had a rather strange way of posting, but since his passing I have noticed that much of the research he did was top notch and if his forecasts were toned down a little (or rather, a lot) he had a very good handle on this one.
Alan
blinger
- 16 Nov 2005 19:20
- 12815 of 27111
DOWN again, and still "the experts" spurt,dear oh, and that genious PM1 got it right all the time???, well if he was short he did, dreamers utter dreamers.
At a tick down a day it will be 7p by Xmas
Enjoy!!!!!!!
Check this one ---------
http://www.britishbulls.com/StockPage.asp?CompanyTicker=SEO&MarketTicker=INDUSTRIALS&Typ=S
blinger
- 16 Nov 2005 19:31
- 12816 of 27111
explosive - 14 Nov 2005 20:52 - 12776 of 12797
Alan - I can sometimes time them. I average 40% a year on the markets and soon will trade for a living...
-------
However if you must quote me then look closely at the words.... """""Average"""" """"Year""""......
---------------
YES i READ IT AGAIN
ROTTFLMFACBH&AO!!!!!!!!!!
ps an inverstment of 100k
at that rate of " average 40% a year", gives 500k in five years, you are nothing short of an investment genius and deserve a medal the "B.S. Gold Star 2005" no less
,Geddoutahere !!!!!!!!!
explosive
- 16 Nov 2005 19:52
- 12817 of 27111
Bling bling, like maths not!!
Year 1 100K, 40% profit = 40K if reinvested
Year 2 140K, 40% profit = 56K if reinvested
Year 3 196K, 40% profit = 78.4K if reinvested
Year 4 274.4K, 40% profit = 109.76K need I continue!!
Good attempt mate but grade D in maths I reckon, go back to school.... Oh an started trading with around 8K...... Using the example above see if you can work out 40% for a gold star... lol....
hewittalan6
- 16 Nov 2005 19:59
- 12818 of 27111
Me old Mucker, bling been on again has he?
I judge from the tone it hasn't been to say "sorry, I was wrong about the crash for the third day running"
or "sorry, but that tip I gave you for SPO hasn't even covered the spread yet"
Of course he is a superlative short term trader, and i wouldn't dream of trying to point out to him that all traders get it wrong sometimes, it's just that, lucky me, I always buy for the long term so the odd little drip doesn't bother me in the slightest.
I will now bow to his better knowledge, while we all learn from the master about stock picking and people skills.
explosive
- 16 Nov 2005 20:03
- 12819 of 27111
I for one think a M&S deal for Starpol would be a good thing... Any addition to the p&l botom line would be a bonus and improve the sp..
hewittalan6
- 16 Nov 2005 20:07
- 12820 of 27111
explosive,
Don't know if you are familiar with PM1. He is definitely running at about 92 pence to the , but even though he is mad as a hatter, his research and knowledge of SEO, its products and applications is second to none. Driver got a message from him saying he is very happy about the M&S deal and thinks it very positive.
Me too.
Alan
explosive
- 16 Nov 2005 20:10
- 12821 of 27111
Alan - Shame you can't unsquelch Bling as recent posts are a good laugh. In tonights addition of the Evening Bling our friend has been having trouble with his sums... Fortunatly if he follows the example I set him and does his homework he'll be top of middle school again....
hewittalan6
- 16 Nov 2005 20:12
- 12822 of 27111
You're a hell of a teacher if you can get him that high!!!
explosive
- 16 Nov 2005 20:16
- 12823 of 27111
Alan, yes I am aware of PM1's posts and outlook. I personaly think alot of his earlier posts were very far fetched and didn't agree with his rate of SEO growth. A positive attitude however is much better than a negative one. Glad to hear he also supports any M&S deal... I don't see how future order book can be a bad thing. It should only help the sp along further...
hewittalan6
- 16 Nov 2005 20:23
- 12824 of 27111
Yeah, not a cup half full or half empty guy, more a "how much is it overflowing by" sort of guy, but some excellent research, even if he did tend to stretch the point a bit!!
blinger
- 16 Nov 2005 20:36
- 12825 of 27111
Explosive are you really this thick??, surely not , an experienced investor like you?
Start with 100k then D math student-lol!!!
Staring with 100k
End Yr. 1 100K@ +40% profit = 140K if reinvested (annual profit +40k)
End yr. 2 140k @ +40% profit= 196k if reinvested (annual profit +56k)
End year 3 196k@+40% profit = 274k if reinvested (annual profit+78k)
End year 4 274 @+40% profit= 352k if reinvested (annual profit +109k)
End year 5 352k + 40% profit=492k if reinvested (anuual profit +140k)
Now if you choose to insult find someone much dimmer than yourself dearie- its called compounding
ps I doubt if you will find anyone
pps I think you meant +4%
ROTFFLMFAC&BO
tHE PRIZE STAnds
blinger
- 16 Nov 2005 20:38
- 12826 of 27111
Now I see why they are all losers , they invest 100k and it becomes 40k in a year
hahahahahahahahahahahahahah!!!!!!!!!!!
Explosive you are THE MAN
LOLOLOLOLOL!!!!!!!!!
blinger
- 16 Nov 2005 20:40
- 12827 of 27111
explosive - 16 Nov 2005 19:52 - 12817 of 12826
Bling bling, like maths not!!
Year 1 100K, 40% profit = 40K if reinvested
Year 2 140K, 40% profit = 56K if reinvested
Year 3 196K, 40% profit = 78.4K if reinvested
Year 4 274.4K, 40% profit = 109.76K need I continue!!
ihahahahahahahahahah!!!!!!!!!!
Find the missing 100k invested
lololololol!!!!!!!!!!!!!
blinger
- 16 Nov 2005 20:51
- 12828 of 27111
Started off with 8k @ +40% average per annum- when 1956?????????????
ROTFFLMFAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
garyble
- 16 Nov 2005 21:03
- 12829 of 27111
Blinger,
Sounds like you're jealous!
blinger
- 16 Nov 2005 21:10
- 12830 of 27111
I assure you I don`t do " jealous", I do `making money`, "jealous", is for those who miss an opportunity, "jealous" is an emotion, emotion is banned from investment- except by losers of course, they are always " jealous"- nearly always of shorters of penny dreadfuls,
sad but true.
A colleague of mine once said to me--
"Whats wrong?"
"Nothing why?"
I thought I saw a flicker of emotion from you "
"Nah, just hungry"
Be cool!!!!!!!!!!
garyble
- 16 Nov 2005 21:16
- 12831 of 27111
Blinger,
What annual return {%} does a trader like yourself make?
explosive
- 16 Nov 2005 21:19
- 12832 of 27111
Evening Bling, I see now the childrens TV has finished you have joined us!!