kitosdad
- 12 Dec 2007 16:20
The engines have fired up at last for MDX. ( BPRG ) At long last they are being recognised for the force they will become over the next two years. On the cusp of disclosing huge revenue-earning deals with Global pharmacists. These have been hinted at as being unrolled before the years end, but may be in the next days.You still have time to get in at a bargain-basement price before the SP takes off for real shortly.
Big Al
- 29 Jul 2008 20:50
- 1295 of 8631
Scottie, dear fellow, Treb knows me fairly well. I'm not old enough to be his dad sohlud he try to convince you.
Right, back to the tarte aux pommes avec creme fraiche - that's French dingbats ................ or was it German?
Treblewide
- 29 Jul 2008 20:57
- 1296 of 8631
i hear chocco has a ball sack :-)...what was that film called with Bob hoskins and the she man....?
scotinvestor...play nice...Al's is a dude
chocolat
- 29 Jul 2008 21:00
- 1297 of 8631
They don't do creme fraiche BigA, but they're big on Sauersahne, silly krauts (s'pose that'd be with a Schmiss of Apfeltorte).
Guess I haven't been on, gingernuts - can it wait until tomorrow for you to show me your sipps?
scotinvestor
- 29 Jul 2008 21:02
- 1298 of 8631
tfc???
sohlud??
me escape?......i love uk but unfortunately me and probably 10 million plus feel forced out by this gov and immigration policy.....globalisation doesnt work.....look at other western nations that use globalisation and they have same problems......i spoke to someone recently from south england up here on a weekend break and they were telling me bnp are getting lot of votes down that way.....bit late
as for shares, well is anyone or organisation doing well.....unless they struck oil....and even then theres no guarantee in sp....just look at tlw recently
bon nuit
Big Al
- 29 Jul 2008 21:06
- 1299 of 8631
With a drizzle of Schnapps? Good plan.
Anyway, back to BPRG - are there any good points here. This "we're going to get taken over by Big Pharma was doing the round in 03/04 over on ADVFN. It didn't happen and the thing went seriously into reverse. I really don't see anything that's going to make it any different this time around, especially at the prices usually bandied about. Have I missed something or what?
scotinvestor
- 29 Jul 2008 21:13
- 1300 of 8631
check out their website.....and recent operational review
i dont know about 2003 with pharma thing but i do think this is real with bid coming up. remember, company will be profit for this year coming up whereas in 2004 they were making 6 million loss when it was 160p.........the market can be very strange!
anyway al.....do some research and reading if u aint done so and then make a judgement.......
Treblewide
- 29 Jul 2008 21:17
- 1301 of 8631
chocco no worries....will be around tomorrow night
chocolat
- 29 Jul 2008 21:32
- 1302 of 8631
Just found your mail thingie, blondie - didn't realise you'd missed me that much.
Wonderful :)
Big Al
- 29 Jul 2008 21:39
- 1303 of 8631
scottie - I've been keeping an eye on this lot all that time. As I said, I really can't see it any differently this time around. It's all Groundhog Day from where I'm sitting. I might be wrong, but what's the odds given past performance?
scotinvestor
- 29 Jul 2008 23:38
- 1304 of 8631
who knows al......we all make decisions in life whether good or bad...as i said before, i think next 2 years will transform as that will be giggest growth.....anyway as i said before just look at banks , housebuilders.....who'd have thought early 2007 that they would collapse
tabasco
- 30 Jul 2008 07:26
- 1305 of 8631
Morning all. You obviously had a late one Scotty I see you had some cruisers onlooks to me they were trying to get you the leading role in Debbie Does Dallas Id turn it down mate!
I thought today was going to be the day the teddy bears had their picniclooks like a baguette!
tabasco
- 30 Jul 2008 08:12
- 1306 of 8631
B J Muncaster - 30 Jul'08 - 08:04 - 93709 of 93714
Look, if you were considering a bid for MDX, then one way to build a stake without driving the price up would be to partner with other holders on the basis that when the deal is done the partner would either (a) receive the bid price for the loaned stock, or (b) have a pre-agreed stake in the new entity. By borrowing stock the borrower gets the voting rights without having to part with cash.
tabasco
- 30 Jul 2008 08:17
- 1307 of 8631
Something tells me Im into something good!
kimoldfield
- 30 Jul 2008 08:33
- 1308 of 8631
D & A Pharma went long with 4,138,945 shares (1.94%) yesterday.
tabasco
- 30 Jul 2008 08:50
- 1309 of 8631
D & A Pharam Capitalised at Euro 20M more like a company Meldex would takeover.
tabasco
- 30 Jul 2008 08:54
- 1310 of 8631
This certainly smacks of a profit warningright..where are all the 5p boys gone
Big Al
- 30 Jul 2008 09:06
- 1311 of 8631
;-))
tabasco
- 30 Jul 2008 09:17
- 1312 of 8631
Morning al..no chirpsee you were trying to soften up our PM. last night. You need to come round to our way of thinking.hes our Rottweiler!
scotinvestor
- 30 Jul 2008 09:23
- 1313 of 8631
funny how BJM knew RT was in paris yesterday ..... dont you think!!
d&a pharma are in paris
scotinvestor
- 30 Jul 2008 09:28
- 1314 of 8631
B J Muncaster - 30 Jul'08 - 06:32 - 1055 of 1056
daveperry,
Your point about the early filing of MDXs patent goes to the heart of the matter. What is not generally known, at least I dont think it is, is that we were developing films and filing patents long before almost any other company. In effect, weve laid an IP minefield that will prove difficult for others to walk through. More than 80 patents in 24 different families is one heck of a matrix to avoid.
Again, most people will not know that we started out life as Film Technology in the early 90s. Little cash, lots of ideas, but with a combination of pig-headed determination and a lot of support from early investors we managed to roll our knowledge base through several entities (always taking our investors with us) until we arrived at BioProgress in 1996.
Along the way we knew we had good ideas from a technical perspective, but we never really appreciated just how those ideas could impact global markets until big companies started nicking our products! One example: Larry Shattles and I set up a small booth at an exhibition in LA, proudly displaying a few bath oil beads encapsulated in XGel. We wandered off for a pint and on our return all our stock had gone. So we were left with just a booth and no stock for four days. Three years later, when in early discussions with Banner Pharmacaps, we were told by one of its executives that it was them that had run-off with our stock. Theyd been trying for years to find an alternative to gelatin to encapsulate drugs but couldnt crack the sealing process, and right there before their very eyes was problem solved by this two-bit outfit from the UK.
Right now I dont think we or anyone else can fully value our IP because until others step on a particular mine, and they will, we dont know how much in $$ terms theyll have to cough up.
I dont have any definite figures, but Id bet our total spend on patents thus far is more than 4 million. It was over 2 million when I left the Company in 2003. Quite a hidden asset yet to bear fruit, but it will.
One other point. Along the way our patent applications have been challenged at every stage by some big players. I think Im correct in saying that to date weve beaten every challenge.
I think its our strong, broad and deep IP base that really excites SM, you only have to look at the number of times hes talked about it in glowing terms. Just think about R&D people in other companies tasked with developing new film based products only to find they keep coming up against MDXs prior art, how frustrating and expensive can that be? With MDX, SM has most if not all of the cards to scoop the pot. He knows it and I know it, thats why Im invested here.