for more information about stanelco click on the links.

driver's research page link
http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/posts.php?tid=7681#lastread
website link
http://www.stanelco.co.uk/index.htm

Red Erik

I'm not willing to debate this with you further. I've posted a realistic assesmment of the situation based on 30 years experience at a high level in the field we are discussing.

What is your professional experience of IP?

If you dont want to believe what I've said, thats up to you. It's no skin off my nose.

oblomov you can claim what you like about experience, but I don't see your claims of difficutly with registering Starpol in the USA as realsistic, because the fact is that there are already two existing Starpol trademarks, and they are both for inedible starch products, so that means they must be allowed because they are for different products within the inedible starch market, and Stanelco's Starpol will therefore be allowed as it is for edible starch, and thus falls totally outside of the inedible starch grouping.

logic beats experience in my book, try looking for the wood amongst the trees

Erik the Red

Red

No offence intended, but you are looking at this from a position of complete ignorance. I already explained in an earlier post why your assumption (that because there are two marks coexisting in different names there will be no problem) was incorrect, so why repeat it?

There is no question of logic here, only knowledge and, again no offence intended, you have no knowledge of the subject.

Answer this - if there is no problem for SEO to obtain registration of the mark in the U.S. why haven't they done it, as they have done in the EU? Would you not expect, with the prominence SEO have given to their ambitions for the U.S. market (Walmart etc) that they would have at least made an application to register the mark if they thought they could get it? There is no such SEO pending application.

I reiterate - you do not know what agreement the existing proprietors of the two STARPOL registrations have with each other.

Please now try to refrain from posting on subjects you obviously have no knowledge or experience of.

Intae him Red, he is bluffing as ever, to hold a share which has fallen in 5 months by -50%, and to still praise its` company from a height, reveals the " experience" of the poster.
It`s a typical penny share dupe, the price hits a high on rumour, people pile in, it halves again, then the rampers move in to boost its` credibilty.The gang then move into a bb, `diss` everyone who doesn`t ramp with them,eventually the price falls to the floor and they disappear .

Boring, boring, boring - all totally irrelevant - has no impact on SP and they can call it whatever they want in the future

"this share is so lame at the moment im out on a blue day , im sick of it "
--------

Thus speaks a convert from another bb, a very wise punter. If it gets a good RNS and volume that is the time to move back in, much better to have a few quid on the Xmas FTSE 100 futures meanwhile- long of course.

FTSE100/SEO

Yes, Baza. Totally agree, and said the same in my post above - they can always change the name.

Oblomov I noticed you complaing about insults before, but your last post is full of insults directed at me, and claims that you cannot in any way back up, as far as "you have no knowledge of the subject" try my employers website if you think so.

http://www.cpaglobal.com/

I have more knowledge than you know about, so don't try and discredit me with factless self-opinionated garbage


Erik the Red

Well that impresses me no end, its great to see a real pro. on a bb, there is so much BS from those "who know a bit", well done Red, a breath of fresh air into a fetid swamp.
Integrity and truth are all that are needed to allow investors to make up their minds, not this constant ramping and putting down dissenters,

excellent.

hi i see your lordship has a bigger spoon than i thought

Oblomov/Red Erik,

Whilst not having any expertise in Patents, I have considered both of your views. I still see it as Red Erik has stated. I can't argue with your stated view ( Oblomov ) as already said, I am not an expert re this, so not saying your wrong. Still thanks to both re 2 sides of the discusion.

Greekman.

I merely seek wisdom and truth, the rest is poppycock, spoons vary in size, obviously, my appetite demands exquisite taste, size is immaterial.

Red,

I can tell you have no in depth knowledge of the subject by what you have said.

You started by accusing me of deliberately not mentioning a US mark which I had mentioned in my initial post and proceeded to hurl insults at me. You presumably have your own personal agenda, though I cant think for the life of me what it can be.

Anyone can find a link to an IP firm and claim to work for them.

This discussion has become totally peurile. There is nothing further to be gained by it continuing.

olie
i dont wish to be pedantic ( well i do really )
but as you are so immersed in correct English usage , maybe you can explain this extract from a recent post of yours?



"Lastly does one have to prove that a share isn`t doing too well when it falls by
-50% ?( that is a minus sign, not a hyphen by the way) in a few months, nope can`t find that in the rules either. "

if it falls by -50%, isnt that a gain of 50%? thats a MINUS sign, not a hyphen by the way btw.

here is a chart post - from fingers xxd at AFN -

is the collapse below 10p coming - will Rampelco put out another jam tomorrow RNS - promising blue sky - next century - talk of wonderful things - BUT NO ORDERS - to try to support the price ?

watch SE0 this week -

Greekman,

We were not discussing Patents we were discussing Trade Marks. Pay attention!

ii, re. the chart post from fingers xxd, good post. shame you had to spoil it.

Morning Boz,
My thoughts entirely. The first balanced post of the week, essentially saying the charts show it has levelled off and the next major movement may give us a clue. Why ii has to then go and show his hand and promise a collapse is beyond me.
Alan