content/uploads/2012/02/091607_Conch_Shoot_3071.jpg" alt="" />

Welcome to CONCHA PLC (formerly Hot Tuna (International) PLC.

The stated aims of CONCHA PLC are to evaluate and invest in a broad range of
technology, media, well being and related industries.


Company History

Hot Tuna was born in Australia in the summer of 1969 to serve the demands of sojourning surfers, the product of a dedicated surfer�s passion fueled by the skill of his fashion designer wife. Spreading on the bodies and boards of watermen through coastal locales in the South Pacific, the brand quickly burgeoned globally, becoming an influential leader in the nascent surf industry and one of the progenitors of the neon era of surf in the '80s. Through the brand�s storied history, a long list of notables, in and out of the water, have waved the Hot Tuna banner at one time or another in their careers, including pro surfers such as Richie Lovett, Robbie Page, Beau Emerton and Drew Courtney.

In September 2005, Hot Tuna (International) PLC purchased the Hot Tuna brand from a consortium of investors and listed it on AIM, a division of the London Stock Exchange.

In the interest of managing its brand profile and distribution globally, the public Company began a rapid acquisition of its licensed interests around the world. Talented designers and key management with apparel business expertise from Quiksilver, O�Neill, Ocean Pacific, Rip Curl and Perry Ellis International, among others, were recruited to drive the process in the key markets of the United States, Australia and the United Kingdom. In July 2006, entrepreneur and fashion icon Elle Macpherson, who grew-up with the brand in Australia, was appointed as an executive director of Hot Tuna (International) PLC, her interests focused on design and distribution issues, as well as overall youth fashion and market insight. The Company's name change to Concha Plc (AIM Ticker: CHA) will become effective and the Company will begin trading under its new name from 8:00 a.m. on 7 February 2012.

http://www.conchaplc.com/

9.4 would be 10%, try again..

a fool will be allways a fool

read and then answer
I said around 10% down

I can see you are frustated but ... live is a bitch for you this days and allways is the motto if you carry on this way

I'm happily short, might even add to the position tomorrow... Good luck with your equities or whatever your holding.

another good run today after yesterday's RNS, it went to 1.055p at one time

I wanted to buy IOF as it was bouncing after yesterday's large fall, so I decided to sell one of the two holding I have on CHA.

a 67% profit was worth cashing in

but you're very quiet about QPP!

do not be a cynic, Rome was not build on 1 day

when you get the profit I do then open your mouth

in the meantime stick to cooking, do not forget to put on the Apron

----

67% profit LOL.... you having trouble with your numbers again....

in the meantime, having slagged off shortie, perhaps you'ld like to be rather more honest and open about your questionable calls, which QPP most assuredly is, at least for now ..... none of us know the future

Don't forget ASC also, posting as Tomasz, or blinkx posting as Galatica....

He went back and edited a post making out he sold COMS too for a profit before it tanked.

The guy is a laff a minute.

nevertheless, the call here was actually pretty good, though for reasons already stated, i wouldn't go near it

Born losers, STAKERS and on top lying through and through

re -COM
the profit was minimal by my standards and sold as the shares were not going anywhere, ( all said on the thread ) the shares tanked a week or 10 days later

edit - looked at spread sheet, says buy 10 march on a T +20 at 7.40p closing on a T+14 at 7.82p on 18 March

They tanked before you edited an old post panto as did BLNX just after one of your bargain top up's.

Your a clown .... and where do you get 60%+ from these ???

Maths as well as English lessons required me thinks.

The call here was buy at .66 maybe at best, sold half @ 1.00 at the best. Factor in buying and selling fees also and Panto would have been lucky if he made 30% with a large transaction.

Shortie

you do have to go to school, event taking your figures gives a 51% profit not 30%, and the prices of buying and selling were better than those you said

I did not sell half but 1 lot of the two I had

one lot of two = half at my primary school

Shortie, short yourself out, you will not catch me cos I post what I do ...............

Below was my first post and that was my second buy on the day at that price 0.6574p the share were moving very fast that day, it finished 0.10p up, the one I sold was bough at 0.62p earlier.

panto - 07 Apr 2014 14:49 - 53 of 145
Paying full offer 0.66p earlier 0.6574p was the norm, must be ready for the next move

re- one lot of two = half at my primary school

not cynic
because one lot was bigger than the other, so go to primary school to learn maths

you lot not good for anything but CHAT, CHAT AND CHAT, so go to the nosence threat and do it there

so bugger off back to menorca then (another of your aliases too)

so did you sell the bigger half or the smaller half?

Another frustated one, can not win with the truth

bugger off ............. you and you family deserve what you lot got, now on the past and the future is my answer