I have put some more thought into my earlier post yesterday
On page 66 post 1313
and this with my original thoughts of my first post
On Page 59 post 1173
Now it is clear that the L&G money raised was to further expand the business and not to make any acquisition, it is plainly obvious that this is what has happened and fantastic growth has been achieved.
At the interim results the company had made growth of 75% over the previous first half. That is tremendous growth and they wanted to grow more and needed funds to do so. This was provided by L&G at 5.75p who were the first institutional investor. Why did they need the money ? The reason is the very nature of the wholesale market, they pay out money on 30 days and get back in 60 days is what is said. The more revenue you gain the more kitty you need to cover creditors and debtors. It is never cash lost from the accounts and is always there, but has to be used to cover the 30 days from out to in. The trading statement is clear there are no cash problems, the cash is tied up in the delayed payment of the wholesale sector and this presented a strain on the working cap.
What is the problem with that ? Nothing has been lost, its there and on the accounts ! Its getting tied up due to massive growth.
The trading statement showed that in the second half, to be reported at the results very soon, they have again increased revenue, this time by over 100% over the first half taking this past year revenue up 75% year on year. Again they need to provide cover for the cash out to cash in and due to this fantastic growth have some strain on the working cap. There is no problem with that, cash has not been lost or gone it is held up on the accounts ledger covering out and in.
What were the growth figures ?
We know interim revenue was 9.1 million (75% up on previous first half). They raised 963K from the L&G placing for the second half growth to cover the additional demands on cash out to cash in.
The second half is in line with present estimates as is over 100% up on the first half. The figure is forecast to be around 22 million. Now this superb gain was likely in excess of the managements forecasts, had they known this was going to happen I am sure they would have raised a bit more from L&G and not 963K.
If they estimated the ability to get a 100% increase on first half in the second half they would have been targeting around 18 million revenue, but it appears they got 22 million. The 963K was likely in part to cover set up and marketing costs of CCR and be that cover for cash in and out on the estimated growth, and owing to the growth potentially being better than forecast the 963K has been tested to the limit. Also they have potentially expensed some of the expenditure on infrastructure expansion (meaning underlying profitability is higher than the forecast 1.1 million PBT).
So we have now approx 22 million revenue to be reported soon with a 1.1 million PBT and EPS of 0.34p and forecast 32 million for the coming year (another 50% increase). They will plan to expand more but will not have the initial start up costs of CCR so will have more money from profits to cover for the cash out and in. This growth is not on the wholesale side but on the retail side which offers higher margins and more profit. This would be the reason they are expanding retail and not wholesale as profitability improves and this reduces strain on the working cap as well.
On this basis on a supposed revenue increase of 9 to 18 and needing 963K ( but this also includes some CCR set up and marketing costs) and with a planned increase of 22 to 32 for the present year, (but growth on the retail side) but also taking into account they have more profits to put back in all they would require to take them through IF they needed it would be NOT a very large placing with L&G again (or a second institution) BUT I think they can manage the strain if they know how to hedge. This would with the increased profits and higher margin retail business leave them around December this year (or before) being free from any amount of strain on the working cap, the higher strain time I think would have been the start of the new financial year (1st of July) but the longer it goes on with higher margin business increasing then the strain will be reduced (as you note they planned no further expansion of the wholesale side as this is the one which gives the highest strain due to the longer delay from out to in). If they got the necessary growth on the retail side in July/August they could as remedial action limit the wholesale side which would have the effect of reducing working cap strain.
They SHOULD be able to work it so that they do not need to address this issue with a small institutional placing and SHOULD be able to wait, if its needed, until such time as they want to do an acquisition if they plan to. Why even then ? With big plans and phenomenal growth prospects they should be diligent to ensure that they plan well ahead for it and never encounter this technical problem again. A short term small bank loan would also easily cover if needed to get them past the period of strain if the strain was heavier than just light. We will know very soon but to repeat again, any placing should it ever happen is due to massive growth and the need to cover for cash out to in delays. The money is there but the kitty needed to cover becomes larger as revenue increases. The move to the retail side and offers higher margin business which will also relieve this out to in cover required.
The future is very bright and this company is growing at a massive rate, which is rare to find. The Corporate Synergy updated 9th September forecast is for 1.1 million PBT at the coming results with EPS of 0.34p and then for this coming year (which started 1st of July) is for PBT of 2.0 million and EPS of 0.66p. This means at the results when the 2006 forecast becomes present year, at a price of 4p we are on a current year PER of just times 6, and with no debt and a tiny PEG value it should be, I feel, on a current year PER of times 20 if the results are good and with no problems (which is 13.2p).
I remain very optimistic and am holding and will add and will be holding that stake on results day morning coming soon in expectation of good news. Envesta is about revenue growth, profit growth and earnings growth and EVEN IF they do require a short term solution to short term working cap strain caused by growth and expanding revenue growth opportunity to allow more and more growth, I am very happy with a company that takes money and makes more money with it to increase profits and earnings per share. If it is going as well as is said then there would be no reason to rule out a morale boosting dividend sometime in 2006 (full year would not seem unreasonable)
I would recommend everyone do their own research, the above is just my view and opinions and I may be totally wrong but hope and think I am not in most of it or even all of it would be nice. For the very latest broker forecast summary figures you can see them yourselves on Hemscott Premium (
Hemscott). The mention to this is because the very latest ones can only be seen on Premium and not Free.