bosley
- 20 Feb 2004 09:34
blinger
- 02 Dec 2005 21:42
- 13260 of 27111
STANELCO (VTX:SEO1.VX) Delayed quote data
Trade Time: 11:21AM ET
Volume: 1,034,964
Avg Vol (3m): N/A
Market Cap: N/A
P/E (ttm): N/A
EPS (ttm): 0.00
Div & Yield: N/A (N/A)
---
Geddit????
oblomov
- 02 Dec 2005 21:49
- 13261 of 27111
I think I see why the animosity (and rubbish posts) from Red Erik now. He's PM1 (not my favourite ex-poster) in drag!
No offence meant, as always.
blinger
- 02 Dec 2005 22:01
- 13262 of 27111
ObLOMOB,
1.I think I see why the animosity(and rubbish posts) from Red Erik now
2.He's PM1 (not my favourite ex-poster) in drag!
3.No offence meant, as always.
-------------
Mountains of offence "patently" meant, once a ` slick` always one, a fence sitter ,
what a prat!!!!
chocbic
- 02 Dec 2005 22:03
- 13263 of 27111
dream on. big investors and 8m all day at 14p. Bollocks! A big investor would buy that in one helping. Saved by PM! oh dear.
blinger
- 02 Dec 2005 22:05
- 13264 of 27111
lol chocbic
Bollox indeed!!!!!!!!!
hewittalan6
- 02 Dec 2005 22:07
- 13265 of 27111
Up 1.25pps today. Normally this thread gets full of bashers and wind-up merchants on an evening, fanfaring its demise after a fall of 0.25pps. I don't see the half of them, coutesy of that lovely little squelch button, but judging by the tone of the remarks I can see, they are out in force again tonight.
I was going to make a pun regarding SEO's low hanging fruit and sour grapes, but I really can't be bothered.
Alan
blinger
- 02 Dec 2005 22:14
- 13266 of 27111
fanfaring
coutesy
-----
Really?
garyble
- 02 Dec 2005 22:17
- 13267 of 27111
Bling Bling,
I see you've managed to re-gain your composure and stopped sweating. I bet you were wondering where this was going, aren't you lucky it was only up 1.25p!
I should take another stab at deramping SEO.
blinger
- 02 Dec 2005 22:25
- 13268 of 27111
Up a penny ha`penny- really
ROTFFLMFACB&HO!!!!!!!!!!!!!
garyble
- 02 Dec 2005 22:35
- 13269 of 27111
Ahhh, so you have a sense of humour. at least you can keep it!
WTFDYKAIYPPOC.....DYUP
oblomov
- 02 Dec 2005 22:42
- 13270 of 27111
Red Erik - 02 Dec 2005 19:50 - 13248 of 13270
Is it a bird? is it a plane? No its PM1!
PM1 slips out the back door of The Daily (Lives on Another) Planet and saves the Day!!!
Why worry about sales, machine conversions, FDA approval, Walmart, when we have the Caped Persuader, PM1!
God save PM1.
ROTFFLMFACB&HO!!!!!!!!!!!!! (Whatever that may mean).
chocbic
- 02 Dec 2005 22:47
- 13271 of 27111
lol, class oblo, class!
Daz England
- 02 Dec 2005 22:51
- 13272 of 27111
I freely admit to knowing little about shares although I'm fortunate enough to know some people that do. Hence my presence on this forum. Having read the preceding threads with interest one thing is obvious
"Those who shout loudest........"
Anyone spring to mind chaps?
hewittalan6
- 02 Dec 2005 22:57
- 13273 of 27111
No.
ROTFLMAOHEHFNIEOFNLSLMCLALA
Or something like that. 8-)
Alan
bosley
- 02 Dec 2005 22:57
- 13274 of 27111
oblomov, it took you long enough ;)
Red Erik
- 03 Dec 2005 11:48
- 13275 of 27111
oblomov, why do you think I am PM1 just because I believe he might be right, I just get his email the same as the majority here, it just seems strange that he emailed those two groups that have announced they are investing in green technology, then a few days later we see difficulty in buying, no difficulty in selling, mm soaking up sells, and the price rising two days in a row, with consistent big buys which could easily be accumulating stock for a big buyer, they don't waltz in and tick up a 10m or 20m buy, you should know that never happens.
I suppose we will have to wait and see, if there is ever an announcement from either of those groups saying they have more than 3% of SEO stock, before we congratulate PM1 on his behind the scenes activities, if that happens do you then heap praise on PM1, or have another dig while he is not here to reply ?
Erik the Red
oblomov
- 03 Dec 2005 12:16
- 13276 of 27111
Red,
PM1 is not here to reply in part because of the wild and misleading claims he made.
If the two groups announced they were investing in green technology they would obviously have had some knowledge of the field. Do you really believe they would not have known about SEO prior to PM1's email?
PM1 emails companies all the time with rediculous propositions. I still remember a series of 'interesting' exchanges I had with him earlier this year after he announced that he had emailed Howard White to suggest SEO bought the plastics bottle arm of ALCAN, which was up for sale. It had a turnover of $130m and he believed non-profit making SEO could afford it! He then tried to convince us that the deal was iminent and the SP would soar on the back of it!
I'm sure you are aware of PM1's prediction of a 50 SP in two years? That was a year ago.
Perhaps you'll forgive me now for finding your posts on PM1 hilarious - but the ALCAN deal PM1 was brokering never happened and neither will a deal with the two groups you have mentioned. Unfortunately, neither will the 50 SP.
IMHO, naturally!
Red Erik
- 03 Dec 2005 12:33
- 13277 of 27111
Oblomov, I notice you attack him for all the things you say he was wrong about, and never comment on his positive traits, and I feel his emails to other companies are valid, as it only takes one to take notice and make a deal, and we are all a little bit richer.
Also, trying to make yourself appear better by slagging off others, is what I expect from minors.
Erik the Red
Dormar
- 03 Dec 2005 13:51
- 13278 of 27111
Oblomov
Why do you continue to post such self opinionated garbage about PM1?
I know the answer, so don't waste your time replying. You infantile fool.
Dormar
- 03 Dec 2005 14:04
- 13279 of 27111
In my experience ( having done many myself ), rollovers are normally seconds apart, not minutes. Although that doesn't mean to say that they can't be minutes apart.
They are also typically close in price, closer than the prevailing difference between the buying and selling prices at the time the transaction is executed. And they can either be at the top or bottom of the spread range, at the discretion of the shareholder.