moneyplus
- 27 Jun 2005 18:57
This one hit the markets running today. Despite negative publicity it was well supported so I jumped in for a small holding--anyone else joining in?? I am hoping for a good run up before the shorters get going.
e t
- 02 Oct 2006 07:46
- 133 of 346
Sportingbet warns on gaming ban, scraps merger
Mon Oct 2, 2006 7:29 AM
LONDON, Oct 2 (Reuters) - Online gaming group Sportingbet Plc said on Monday it would scrap a planned merger and might stop doing business with U.S. customers after legislation was passed there aimed at preventing gambling over the Internet.
"Should Sportingbet's non-U.S. international banking partners determine that the act applied to them, then Sportingbet would no longer be able to take deposits from U.S. residents and this would have a material impact on the company's trading performance," it said in a statement.
"The boards of Sportingbet Plc and World Gaming Plc have discontinued any discussions with regard to a potential offer by Sportingbet for World Gaming," the two groups added.
e t
- 02 Oct 2006 07:56
- 134 of 346
SBT down 74% and falling !!!!!!
PRTY down 32% and falling !!!!!!
888 down 40% and falling !!!!!!
slkhlaw
- 02 Oct 2006 08:37
- 135 of 346
Don't catch a falling knife. Ditch those shares while you can.
Harlosh
- 02 Oct 2006 08:58
- 136 of 346
How amazingly insightful Fundamentalist's post of June 2005 proved to be which I reproduce below - it could have been written today if we didn't know better:
"moneyplus
my thoughts fwiw
there may be some short term upside but to me for the longer term the risks far outweigh the potential reward
I am someone who plays poker online regularly and can see why party is a popular site. However, there is large potential downside in the future based on US govt policy as to whether online gambling is legal - currently it is deemed to be illegal but not policed. Party receive 87% of their revenues from US citizens - if this avenue of revenue and profit is lost then the company will be but a shadow of its current self. To me there are two possible ways this can go long term:
1) The US govt crackdown on their citizens gambling on-line - they have already started by putting pressure on the likes of paypal who do not allow money tfrs to gambling sites. They are also rumoured to be starting to put the pressure onto the banks and credit card companies.
2) The US govt decide to legalise online gambling. If this were to happen then the competition to party will increase overnight with several very big players, especially the casinos who would be likely to bring out their own sites. They would have the ability to link the games to real live games in the casino and offer "comps" to the online players like they do the "live" players. If this were to happen then party could well get squeezed out of the market completely. Ultimately the barriers to entry for competitors are low - the value is the brand name and its customers -the software can effectively be bought off the shelf now.
Based on this, party will only be successful while the US govt continue to dither in either enforcing or changing their policy in this area. Until then, they are likely to generate substantial amounts of cash.
My other concern is to why they have floated - the cash was not needed to help grow the business, it is just to enable the founders to take some money out of the business - would they be doing this if they thought the companys prospects were going to get better?
Long term i think this is a share i would be happy to short but am currently on the sidelines until the price has settled down and found a trading range - i wouldnt be surprised to see it rise over the coming weeks but personally dont see it being a ftse100 company in a few years time.
Fundamentalist.
0rient
- 02 Oct 2006 10:45
- 137 of 346
janetbennison....hope your ok....guaranteed stop loss??
janetbennison
- 02 Oct 2006 11:23
- 138 of 346
did not have a stop loss
janetbennison
- 02 Oct 2006 11:31
- 139 of 346
friday prty closed at 1.07 this morning the opened at .40. If I had left say a stop loss at .90p would this have still worked even though they opened at .40p. I have never really understood how the system works. I have taken a real battering today on this one. I will haave to sit on these long tern now this has happened. Good luck to all of you.
Fundamentalist
- 02 Oct 2006 11:35
- 140 of 346
Janet
sorry to hear of your loss
with regard to stop losses, if you had a normal stop loss then no it wouldnt have helped you as the price "gapped" past your stop. However, you are able to take a guaranteed stop out (you pay a little extra on the spread for this) and this would have exited you at whatever price you set it at
With regard to sitting on these long term, i would recommend revisiting the fundamentals and working out whether in light of the last few days whether they are good value at their current price. If not then i would look to sell and put your funds into a stock with a better outlook
cynic
- 02 Oct 2006 11:49
- 141 of 346
JB .... as Fundy says unless it was guaranteed, then no, it would have made no difference as price was dumped to 40p at the opening and you would have been closed out at that price .... you will need to talk to your broker about guaranteed stops as just possible not available on all if the stock is considered too volatile or similar or only at a significant premium
slkhlaw
- 02 Oct 2006 12:25
- 142 of 346
80,000 is a very big position in my oppinion, I hope Janet, you didn't put all your eggs in one basket or do it through CFD. Given the P/E for the share is already very high on its own, close to 20 if I remember correctly and considering 80% to 90% of Party's revenue is generated from US market, I felt that it still have some more downtrend to follow. I would quickly close my position if I were you.
Here is how I value this share. (80% plunge in EPS), revised EPS = 20% x 6p = 1.2p.
P/E was previous 18, that is significantly higher than the FTSE average of 13. I doubt people would still be willing to pay for such a high P/E after knowing all these bad news. Say they will pay the industry average of 13, that would value the share at 16p or thereabout. Given whatever the price is now, 45p say. There is still quite a distant to fall.
Anyway, you can also bet the board will significantly expand the European market to counterweight the exposure to the US market and things could get brighter in a few years time, who knows?
Fundamentalist
- 02 Oct 2006 13:03
- 143 of 346
Think the EPS could well be worse than that if they have to close all US accounts as they will have a much higher proportion of fixed costs in relation to the remaining turnover and gross profit (i say gross profit because im not convinced they will have a net profit). It will also put a lot of pressure on the balance sheet and gearing of the company.
I also wonder what short term effect is on cash flow position if all US players need the cash they have in their online accounts returned (hopefully this is ringfenced but i cant find anything that confirms this)
slkhlaw
- 02 Oct 2006 13:24
- 144 of 346
I have not thought of the cash flow problem, thanks for enlighting me. Oh well, I think it is just as bad a day for the board as it is for the investors.
They will probably be kicked out of FTSE100 the next time round much like Corus and other shares did. But Corus is doing brilliantly in FTSE250. Perhaps maybe when Party being demoted to FTSE250 only will I start considering buying it again.
bonfield
- 02 Oct 2006 16:02
- 145 of 346
Ms Bennison you have very deep pockets! Given your ownership of VOG,IOT,GOO,PRTY and the like I'm surprised you're still solvent. Do you trade on margin or just regular holdings?
stockbunny
- 02 Oct 2006 16:13
- 146 of 346
Hey Janet - chin up gal - said one gal to another.
You're not the only one who's stuck still holding these, I'm another one and I am sure there are a lot more - there certainly were a lot admitting they were buying in when things were good! This one was always a big gamble, I've done well with it in the past but always knew it could be a disaster, it was a risk taken, profited from and now..well it's a case of wait and see. I certainly wont dump at this price but that's just IMHO, it's made up a few pence today - so far - we shall have to see.
:>)
cynic
- 02 Oct 2006 16:25
- 147 of 346
stock* and JB .... far from convinced that continuing to hold is correct ...... i thought the market might deem the fall overdone this morning, but the recovery has not continued
stockbunny
- 02 Oct 2006 16:35
- 148 of 346
Agreed Cynic but I'm not bailing right now, decision made rightly or wrongly.
That's not to say I wont bail out tomorrow, next day or next week but just not today.
Fundamentalist
- 02 Oct 2006 17:32
- 150 of 346
ST
only trying to help in answer to a question
maestro
- 02 Oct 2006 19:41
- 152 of 346
who needs friggin America...shareprice has fallen to this over emphasis on yankeeland...hundreds more countries to be in...the growth story has just begun