for more information about stanelco click on the links.

driver's research page link
http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/posts.php?tid=7681#lastread
website link
http://www.stanelco.co.uk/index.htm

Kivver, if you want to find paul and join his mailing list, go to his website at http://www.stanelco.devisland.net

He sends out all the info he finds that he thinks is relevant to SEO, and tells you when he has sent info to companies to try and get them interested in SEO, also he has good contact with SEO it appears.

Erik the Red

Cheers Erik, do i presume Paul is pm1.

Kivver
If you want to know about this stock read the Research Page it is well balanced but leaning towards seo because I do the R/Page and have been in seo since 2 to 3p and will sell half whan it gets to 150p with in two years.
Click my green house.

Kivver,
Bullish, but that is over the medium to long term. Most of the bashers are short termists, looking to make a few quid on the swings that inevitabley occur on this kind of share, and jolly good luck to them, because SEO is knocking on a lot of huge doors and one of them will eventually open. Once it does and is announced, I would hate to be short.
My own feeling is that being long may see me lose a bit, short term, but with the knowledge that when it does blow, it will be a gusher. Going short may be the right short term strategy but the risk of it blowingmeans that if you were caught short when it did, it would be a disaster.
Pay your money and take your choice.
Place your bets, folks. The wheel is spinning and there will be some big gainers soon. Whether thats the shorts or the longs is anyones guess.
Alan

kivver, as driver said , everything you need to know is on his research page. it's a very infromative , well put together thread. as for pm1, if you think of your old friends informer, pro, wa157te......well, they were amateurs in comparison!!

Bosley, is that the lucky number post 13333 ?

Erik the Red

Kivver, If you are going to consult pm1's site, bear in mind he was banned here and on the other two major BB's and read his info in that context.

Driver, on the other hand, is still with us and his research is widely based and factual rather than, shall we say, selective.

Oblomov, that is the biggest load of tripe I have seen for years regarding PM1, as if being banned here or anywhere else has anything to do with what is on his website.

I guess you haven't even bothered to go look at it, so speak from ignorance.

Erik the Red

It has a lot to do with it, Red Erik.

He can write what he wants on his own website and no-one can challenge it. He isn't going to ban himself.

He could be challenged on what he said on the 3 BB's that banned him. Thats why they banned him.

I have no wish to prolong the 'pm1 debate', but are you aware , for example, why he was removed from FYB?

must admit his site must be of some quality for SEO themselves to mention it !

Just to clarify my post this morning ,,i was only saying PM1 has made some bad calls and won't back down (even when they are going down), you have to admit your mistakes ,i just made a very expensive one on BFC, i wasn't however telling all that they still had massive potential when they were suspended,, i knew i was going to lose money ,it happens.. I have made money from this share in the past but no longer hold a position ,however good luck to those who do ..

Oblomov, you are talking tripe and you know it, PM1's site contains facts not his opinions so it has nothing to do with BB bans, which is a lot more than anyone can say about your self-opinionated primadonna of the SEO BB posts.

Erik the Red

Red,

He posted 'facts' on the BB's, except it was often proved that they weren't facts.

How long have you been reading the SEO threads on the BB's? I dont think you could have been followingthe FYB thread when the admin proved he had deliberately lied to ramp a share and then refused to back down. All I'm saying to Kivver is beware. People were always ready to believe PM1 because he told them what they wanted to hear - i.e. SEO SP is going to 50. He had great 'facts' to back that up, but of course it was utter twaddle.

Goodnight.

Oblo/Erik (4 letters each - no bias!)

Paul was not banned by MAM, FYB, or ADVFN for his research site. SEO have a link to it so they are indirectly endorsing its factual content (as sellsell said). There is NO OPINION expressed anywhere apart possibly indirectly from the choice of content, although I do not see it.

He was banned following his outbursts when he had had enough of personal attacts from posters and won't back down (as jimmy b said). IMO he over-reacted but I see some justification as he was provoked way beyond reasonable comment or banter. One banning would have been lifted but for his refusal to agree to modify his behaviour in future.

IMO all sites are the worse off for him not being available.

A new week, possibly a very very exciting new week, starts in a quarter of an hour. Can we drop this and concentrate on what affects our pockets, not our prides.

Nice one Paul! Every one is talking about you even tough you are no longer on this board. There is no debate without any connections to yours researches and yours informations. That proves one simple thing: you have done a great job!

how sad must an individual be to crawl back somewhere they have been banned from under a different name? it beggars belief, really , it does.

Oblomov, I see you still hate PM1, thank you for proving it, I will let him know although I expect others already have.

By the way, he told me he will have his own BB on the website soon, for shareholders only, I guess you won't be there then, as you are without doubt only here to stop people becoming shareholders.

Erik the Red

Tonyrelaxes,

Morning, re your comments re PM1...They are exactly right. The big problem is certain persons who often post good info are in danger of being ignored due to their continuing spat over PM1 that appears never ending ( Not refering to you ). It's like kids in a playground. To those involved, I am not taking sides and have my own views on PM1 which I have stated in the past. That was it, I then let others make up their own minds.

from today's carclo results.

"Carclo Technical Plastics jointly owns a patent with Stanelco plc for injection
moulded water soluble capsules for drug delivery and dietary supplements. We
have made encouraging progress in the last few months with this technology. We
are working closely with a customer who intends to use the technology in veterinary
applications and have high level discussions underway with major drug delivery
companies on the human application of the technology."

this from carclo's results today


Carclo Technical Plastics jointly owns a patent with Stanelco plc for injection
moulded water soluble capsules for drug delivery and dietary supplements. We
have made encouraging progress in the last few months with this technology. We
are working closely with a customer who intends to use the technology in veterinary
applications and have high level discussions underway with major drug delivery
companies on the human application of the technology.