for more information about stanelco click on the links.

driver's research page link
http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/posts.php?tid=7681#lastread
website link
http://www.stanelco.co.uk/index.htm

It has a lot to do with it, Red Erik.

He can write what he wants on his own website and no-one can challenge it. He isn't going to ban himself.

He could be challenged on what he said on the 3 BB's that banned him. Thats why they banned him.

I have no wish to prolong the 'pm1 debate', but are you aware , for example, why he was removed from FYB?

must admit his site must be of some quality for SEO themselves to mention it !

Just to clarify my post this morning ,,i was only saying PM1 has made some bad calls and won't back down (even when they are going down), you have to admit your mistakes ,i just made a very expensive one on BFC, i wasn't however telling all that they still had massive potential when they were suspended,, i knew i was going to lose money ,it happens.. I have made money from this share in the past but no longer hold a position ,however good luck to those who do ..

Oblomov, you are talking tripe and you know it, PM1's site contains facts not his opinions so it has nothing to do with BB bans, which is a lot more than anyone can say about your self-opinionated primadonna of the SEO BB posts.

Erik the Red

Red,

He posted 'facts' on the BB's, except it was often proved that they weren't facts.

How long have you been reading the SEO threads on the BB's? I dont think you could have been followingthe FYB thread when the admin proved he had deliberately lied to ramp a share and then refused to back down. All I'm saying to Kivver is beware. People were always ready to believe PM1 because he told them what they wanted to hear - i.e. SEO SP is going to 50. He had great 'facts' to back that up, but of course it was utter twaddle.

Goodnight.

Oblo/Erik (4 letters each - no bias!)

Paul was not banned by MAM, FYB, or ADVFN for his research site. SEO have a link to it so they are indirectly endorsing its factual content (as sellsell said). There is NO OPINION expressed anywhere apart possibly indirectly from the choice of content, although I do not see it.

He was banned following his outbursts when he had had enough of personal attacts from posters and won't back down (as jimmy b said). IMO he over-reacted but I see some justification as he was provoked way beyond reasonable comment or banter. One banning would have been lifted but for his refusal to agree to modify his behaviour in future.

IMO all sites are the worse off for him not being available.

A new week, possibly a very very exciting new week, starts in a quarter of an hour. Can we drop this and concentrate on what affects our pockets, not our prides.

Nice one Paul! Every one is talking about you even tough you are no longer on this board. There is no debate without any connections to yours researches and yours informations. That proves one simple thing: you have done a great job!

how sad must an individual be to crawl back somewhere they have been banned from under a different name? it beggars belief, really , it does.

Oblomov, I see you still hate PM1, thank you for proving it, I will let him know although I expect others already have.

By the way, he told me he will have his own BB on the website soon, for shareholders only, I guess you won't be there then, as you are without doubt only here to stop people becoming shareholders.

Erik the Red

Tonyrelaxes,

Morning, re your comments re PM1...They are exactly right. The big problem is certain persons who often post good info are in danger of being ignored due to their continuing spat over PM1 that appears never ending ( Not refering to you ). It's like kids in a playground. To those involved, I am not taking sides and have my own views on PM1 which I have stated in the past. That was it, I then let others make up their own minds.

from today's carclo results.

"Carclo Technical Plastics jointly owns a patent with Stanelco plc for injection
moulded water soluble capsules for drug delivery and dietary supplements. We
have made encouraging progress in the last few months with this technology. We
are working closely with a customer who intends to use the technology in veterinary
applications and have high level discussions underway with major drug delivery
companies on the human application of the technology."

this from carclo's results today


Carclo Technical Plastics jointly owns a patent with Stanelco plc for injection
moulded water soluble capsules for drug delivery and dietary supplements. We
have made encouraging progress in the last few months with this technology. We
are working closely with a customer who intends to use the technology in veterinary
applications and have high level discussions underway with major drug delivery
companies on the human application of the technology.

Tony Relaxes - well said - I agree your comments - now back to business

ssanebs,

Good find.

This is my last post on this subject. I'm sure the PM1 fans amongst you will continue to believe what you want to.

Tony,

I have great respect for your posts usually, but you have it wrong, at least for the reason you give for PM1 being banned from FYB. You may not have followed the story at the time. In a nutshell, he was banned not in relation to anything that took place on the SEO thread, but on the 'CROWN' thead. He had ramped the share in his usual style and many investors on the thread (perhaps you were one of them, Red!) invested and thought he was marvellous.

Then the shares were suspended. PM1 said they had been suspended so that the SP could be adjusted and that they would be reinstated at a much higher price (I'm sure no-one here would disagree that that was total rubbish) He was challenged by the FTB admin and (surprise surprise) wouldn't back down. Thats why he went.

This is why I am suspicious of him and why, when I see Red praising him, I have to speak up so that those unaware of his past can put him into some kind of perspective.

On this site the 'spat' leading to his removal was over his 'paste' from a SEO RNS. The RNS said that SEOs starch based products were only slightly more expensive than the oil based alternatives. Somehow, during PM1s cut and paste, that changed to SEOs starch based product being cheaper than the oil based alternative.

This is from STANELCOs website in relation to PM1s site:- The website and information contained therein is not contributed, reviewed or monitored by Stanelco. Therefore any materials on this site do not necessarily reflect the views of Stanelco Plc or its Directors and we accept no liability for its contents."

i.e. Stanelco do not endorse PM1s website - their note is in place to distance themselves from it


Red,

I dont hate PM1. I dont hate anyone. I dont like his posts, his motives for making the posts and I wouldnt trust anything I read by him one inch. That doesnt mean I hate him. I dont know him.

Its silly to say I'm trying to stop people buying SEO shares. My recommendation, for what its worth, is to buy them. They have tremendous potential. I am a shareholder myself. That doesn't mean I have to lie to promote them.

You are personalising this, and there is no need to. It, strangely enough, is what he used to do.

Good news from Carclo, should add to the rise when the news has travelled.

Erik the Red

i see - PM1 - is back as CF3 - and Erik the Red - up to him -

now - you may see - i have been quiet - in recent weeks - due to things - going on - in the background - with SE0 - and to be fair - to all holders - news is due - a large potential deal - that will - turn around - SE0 - a company maker -

at this time - waiting for final news - i say now - a buy to 20p - and wait for news -

so - the bear - is being fair - enjoy - if you get the news - by Friday close -

i've just fallen over!!! blimey!!!!!!!!!!

Yea Bosley

I had to read that three times before I could believe it was ii. Whatever it is you've been taking or doing ii keep it up.

I still can't reconcile your last post with all the others you made. If SEO do announce a deal it will be a while before anything gets to the bottom line as you have repeatedly stressed in your previous posts.

Nice change though.

The oily one

I've bought in this morning, looking good imo.