Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

Tadpole , Microsoft/ Hewlett Packard Alliance. (TAD)     

Moneylender - 23 Jan 2003 08:09

graph.php?movingAverageString=%2C50%2C20

snakey - 06 Apr 2005 22:30 - 1334 of 2262

I am convinced that TAD will be back in the teens again very soon, and deservedly so.

Moneylender - 07 Apr 2005 09:16 - 1335 of 2262

I guess the AGM is now within T25 range, so expect to see some
more traders in and out.

M

yuff - 07 Apr 2005 09:20 - 1336 of 2262

ML
Whats oily been saying on advfn?

Moneylender - 07 Apr 2005 09:37 - 1337 of 2262

Yuff

Nothing really un toward on TAD thread. I understand the "rampers " on BPRG thread got him suspended for a few weeks, but I dont follow that thread
so cant really confirm.

Any news on the latest rumour?
Mail me if you like, I have lost all my contacts, hard drive failure.

M

pachandl - 07 Apr 2005 10:32 - 1338 of 2262

ML "Any news on the latest rumour?" - is this the AOL rumour or a new one? Cheers.

pachandl - 07 Apr 2005 12:35 - 1339 of 2262

An interesting tug-of-war is developing between sellers and buyers.

Moneylender - 07 Apr 2005 13:22 - 1340 of 2262

Parch

I am afraid its the only rumour i know about these days.
TAD is now more or less water tight. Up side is of course that any "good" news cannot be in the price already!!

M

pachandl - 08 Apr 2005 12:02 - 1341 of 2262

So there you have it - inflated rumours before disclosing GEM. Unbelievable. And to think that Tad had already received 1m+ recently from another deal. They really must be desperate for the money to dilute as this level of sp.

superrod - 08 Apr 2005 12:04 - 1342 of 2262

yet more bad news :o(

snappy - 08 Apr 2005 12:08 - 1343 of 2262

Well there you have it the company is doing so well, with so many revenue generating deals, that Gem has had to be used once again.

Don't want to be the one to say told you so but ...................

pachandl - 08 Apr 2005 12:25 - 1344 of 2262

No Snappy, I don't want you to say "I told you so" - it would be too much like shooting the mourners at a funeral.

AMharry4899 - 08 Apr 2005 12:25 - 1345 of 2262

WHAT A SHIT COMPANY GLAD I SOLD THESE LAST YEAR AT 18P - MOR LUCK THAN JUDGMENT THOUGH TO BE HONEST

snappy - 08 Apr 2005 12:45 - 1346 of 2262

Anyone care to speculate when the bulletin boards will be mourning the loss of this cash burning, loss making outfit?

2006, 2007?

Quite a bit more Gem financing still available to drawdown on, but of course that is dependant on average daily trading volumes of course.

Time to start the rumour mill again after the last rumour failed to inspire much of a rally in the share price?

pachandl - 08 Apr 2005 16:23 - 1347 of 2262

Tad never ceases to amaze me - the sp is higher now than it was at the beginning of the week when talk of an imminent Gem drawdown was not even being considered. It's almost worth being in the share for its amusement value.

superrod - 08 Apr 2005 16:45 - 1348 of 2262

bloody expensive amusement.

i for one cant fathom out what is going on. a favourite ploy of mms is to raise the offer to suck in buyers, but even that makes no sense.

gem sold way below the bid, so why has it gone up?

looks like the wages are being paid and the company hoping for a bit of revenue from somewhere. all this from a diehard ( 10 years ) tad fan.

other scenarios welcome.......tad has survived so long on promises, it would be a bloody shame to see them bust now.

ps

no position at present.

snappy - 08 Apr 2005 17:49 - 1349 of 2262

rod,

the shares will be issued to Gem shortly, but their is no proof that they have sold any into the market yet. The rns says only that they will be added to the official list and the price that Gem will subscribe to them.

same old same old with Tadpole, nothing changes including the fact that they must still be loss making, otherwise they wouldn't be drawing down on the Gem facility.

Popping over to iii for some ammusement.

Have a pleasant weekend all.

yuff - 08 Apr 2005 18:23 - 1350 of 2262

snappy

I think there is every chance the shares have already been sold, after all would you be confident of getting rid of 11m shares at more than 5.82p, no matter how pally, pally they are with the mm's.
I am sure GEM haven't paid for the shares to take a loss.

pachandl - 21 Apr 2005 11:38 - 1351 of 2262

Someone just bought 294,000 Tad shares - are they mad?

yuff - 21 Apr 2005 17:54 - 1352 of 2262

Yes.

pachandl - 21 Apr 2005 20:46 - 1353 of 2262

Thanks Yuff - you have confirmed my suspicions - just checking that I have all my marbles.
Register now or login to post to this thread.