bosley
- 20 Feb 2004 09:34
bosley
- 05 Dec 2005 00:07
- 13344 of 27111
how sad must an individual be to crawl back somewhere they have been banned from under a different name? it beggars belief, really , it does.
Red Erik
- 05 Dec 2005 06:28
- 13345 of 27111
Oblomov, I see you still hate PM1, thank you for proving it, I will let him know although I expect others already have.
By the way, he told me he will have his own BB on the website soon, for shareholders only, I guess you won't be there then, as you are without doubt only here to stop people becoming shareholders.
Erik the Red
greekman
- 05 Dec 2005 07:09
- 13346 of 27111
Tonyrelaxes,
Morning, re your comments re PM1...They are exactly right. The big problem is certain persons who often post good info are in danger of being ignored due to their continuing spat over PM1 that appears never ending ( Not refering to you ). It's like kids in a playground. To those involved, I am not taking sides and have my own views on PM1 which I have stated in the past. That was it, I then let others make up their own minds.
bosley
- 05 Dec 2005 07:44
- 13347 of 27111
from today's carclo results.
"Carclo Technical Plastics jointly owns a patent with Stanelco plc for injection
moulded water soluble capsules for drug delivery and dietary supplements. We
have made encouraging progress in the last few months with this technology. We
are working closely with a customer who intends to use the technology in veterinary
applications and have high level discussions underway with major drug delivery
companies on the human application of the technology."
ssanebs
- 05 Dec 2005 07:44
- 13348 of 27111
this from carclo's results today
Carclo Technical Plastics jointly owns a patent with Stanelco plc for injection
moulded water soluble capsules for drug delivery and dietary supplements. We
have made encouraging progress in the last few months with this technology. We
are working closely with a customer who intends to use the technology in veterinary
applications and have high level discussions underway with major drug delivery
companies on the human application of the technology.
bhunt1910
- 05 Dec 2005 07:45
- 13349 of 27111
Tony Relaxes - well said - I agree your comments - now back to business
greekman
- 05 Dec 2005 08:03
- 13350 of 27111
ssanebs,
Good find.
oblomov
- 05 Dec 2005 08:10
- 13351 of 27111
This is my last post on this subject. I'm sure the PM1 fans amongst you will continue to believe what you want to.
Tony,
I have great respect for your posts usually, but you have it wrong, at least for the reason you give for PM1 being banned from FYB. You may not have followed the story at the time. In a nutshell, he was banned not in relation to anything that took place on the SEO thread, but on the 'CROWN' thead. He had ramped the share in his usual style and many investors on the thread (perhaps you were one of them, Red!) invested and thought he was marvellous.
Then the shares were suspended. PM1 said they had been suspended so that the SP could be adjusted and that they would be reinstated at a much higher price (I'm sure no-one here would disagree that that was total rubbish) He was challenged by the FTB admin and (surprise surprise) wouldn't back down. Thats why he went.
This is why I am suspicious of him and why, when I see Red praising him, I have to speak up so that those unaware of his past can put him into some kind of perspective.
On this site the 'spat' leading to his removal was over his 'paste' from a SEO RNS. The RNS said that SEOs starch based products were only slightly more expensive than the oil based alternatives. Somehow, during PM1s cut and paste, that changed to SEOs starch based product being cheaper than the oil based alternative.
This is from STANELCOs website in relation to PM1s site:- The website and information contained therein is not contributed, reviewed or monitored by Stanelco. Therefore any materials on this site do not necessarily reflect the views of Stanelco Plc or its Directors and we accept no liability for its contents."
i.e. Stanelco do not endorse PM1s website - their note is in place to distance themselves from it
Red,
I dont hate PM1. I dont hate anyone. I dont like his posts, his motives for making the posts and I wouldnt trust anything I read by him one inch. That doesnt mean I hate him. I dont know him.
Its silly to say I'm trying to stop people buying SEO shares. My recommendation, for what its worth, is to buy them. They have tremendous potential. I am a shareholder myself. That doesn't mean I have to lie to promote them.
You are personalising this, and there is no need to. It, strangely enough, is what he used to do.
Red Erik
- 05 Dec 2005 08:23
- 13352 of 27111
Good news from Carclo, should add to the rise when the news has travelled.
Erik the Red
insiderinside
- 05 Dec 2005 08:25
- 13353 of 27111
i see - PM1 - is back as CF3 - and Erik the Red - up to him -
now - you may see - i have been quiet - in recent weeks - due to things - going on - in the background - with SE0 - and to be fair - to all holders - news is due - a large potential deal - that will - turn around - SE0 - a company maker -
at this time - waiting for final news - i say now - a buy to 20p - and wait for news -
so - the bear - is being fair - enjoy - if you get the news - by Friday close -
bosley
- 05 Dec 2005 08:32
- 13354 of 27111
i've just fallen over!!! blimey!!!!!!!!!!
Oilywag
- 05 Dec 2005 08:45
- 13355 of 27111
Yea Bosley
I had to read that three times before I could believe it was ii. Whatever it is you've been taking or doing ii keep it up.
I still can't reconcile your last post with all the others you made. If SEO do announce a deal it will be a while before anything gets to the bottom line as you have repeatedly stressed in your previous posts.
Nice change though.
The oily one
shamona
- 05 Dec 2005 09:57
- 13356 of 27111
I've bought in this morning, looking good imo.
oblomov
- 05 Dec 2005 10:09
- 13357 of 27111
Bloody hell!!!!!!
Who is that pretending to be ii ?
greekman
- 05 Dec 2005 10:20
- 13359 of 27111
I wonder how many more of these scare stories will be published before a government somewhere in the world bans plastic type food packaging altogether. No doubt in the future there will be companies taken to court re huge damages due to health problems being proven linked to such packaging.
For full article see link.
http://www.medindia.net/news/view_news_main.asp?x=6081
Food packaging with Bisphenol A damages the brain
A University of Cincinnati (UC) research team comprising Scott Belcher, PhD, did a study that Bisphenol A shows negative effect in brain tissue 'at surprisingly low doses.'
Worded by Dr. Belcher, 'These new studies are also the first to show that oestrogens rapid signalling mechanisms are active in the developing and maturing brain in regions not thought to be involved with sexual differences or reproductive functions,'
'BPA molecules are linked into polymers used to create polycarbonate plastics and epoxy resins that are widely used in many products,' said Dr. Belcher. 'While plastics are typically thought of as being stable, scientists have known for many years that the chemical linkage between BPA molecules was unstable, and that BPA leaches into food or beverages in contact with the plastics.
My comment... Okay not as I see it used directly for the type of packaging that SEO are into ( more of a storage container ) but there are so many links with plastics and health warning reports/studies will their use in food contact be eventually banned altogether.
Bugz
- 05 Dec 2005 10:37
- 13360 of 27111
Any of you nutters doing repeat buys of 3353 at 14.91?!!
Must be confident coz he's wasting a lot on his commission on each trade ...........
oblomov
- 05 Dec 2005 10:41
- 13361 of 27111
That'll be code, bugz. You'll have to ask Red Erik what it means.
Bugz
- 05 Dec 2005 10:49
- 13362 of 27111
Lol!!
I have to admit I'm not a fully converted 'believer' as yet.
hewittalan6
- 05 Dec 2005 10:53
- 13363 of 27111
Who is this imposter. Give us back the ii we know and love, you bodysnatcher, you.
It has all started to unnerve me, somewhat!!
Alan