moneyman
- 20 Jul 2003 23:02
Yoomedia ( www.yoomedia.com) are looking for a slice of a 6 Billion pound government payout to provide the likes of interactive voting from your remote control.The market cap could explode if the company wins a slice of the pie.It has recently set up a new division to expoite the tremendous opportunity that this sector has to offer.
A must have share for the long term.Very illiquid stock which translates to relatively small purchases moving the price rapidly.If a big player takes an interest this could honestly move beyond our wildest dreams.
Dil
- 06 Oct 2006 16:45
- 134 of 172
always one twat :-)
Treblewide
- 06 Oct 2006 16:52
- 135 of 172
dil...the guy is a plonker....this is his claim on AFN board.....hardly backed up by his picking of POO
maestro - 18 Sep 2006 16:36 - 7 of 8
treble..i tipped Seven Arts.. 300% rise today...i only back multi baggers...thats why i'm a QXL legend...make Evil look like a novice
Dil
- 06 Oct 2006 19:56
- 136 of 172
Treb .... he's a wind up merchant , takes one to spot one sometimes :-)
Dil
- 06 Oct 2006 23:53
- 138 of 172
OK ... he's a lucky tw&t :-)
WOODIE
- 11 Oct 2006 12:51
- 139 of 172
taken from todays racing post
End of the road for Channel 854
Channel 854, William Hills five nights weekly live greyhound service on the Sky digital platform, is to cease broadcasting at the end of this month. The final programme is likely to be a double-header from Brough Park and Walthamstow on Saturday, October 28.
Originally designated as a sports channel on Skys electronic programme guide and broadcast as Channel 425, the live greyhound service first aired from Sunderland on October 6, 2004 and remained on that number until reclassified as gaming channel and switched to Channel 854 in March this year.
Very much a go-alone Hills operation which other betting operators happily piggy-backed, it seems the decision to pull the plug owes more to the failure to attract sufficient revenue streams from the interactive content, virtual racing and the like, which was the overwhelming staple of the channel rather than of any lack of interest in the nightly greyhound broadcasts
Dil
- 11 Oct 2006 13:24
- 140 of 172
ooops
john50
- 12 Oct 2006 14:15
- 141 of 172
From the iii board
RESPONSE FROM AIM REGULATION! Ernest Scribbler
Heres the response, I'll be taking a private action, and keep you informed.
************
Dear XXXXXXXXX
Thank you for your email in respect of Yoomedia plc ("the Company").
Where concerns arise in relation to a company's compliance with the AIM
Rules, the Exchange will take appropriate steps to investigate any
potential breaches of those rules. Our duty of confidentiality precludes
us from commenting on individual cases, but we would like to assure you
that any issues raised that may indicate a company may have breached its
responsibilities under the AIM Rules are investigated thoroughly and
appropriate action taken. Such action may include sanctions as provided
for by the Rules and in certain circumstances referral may be made to
other regulatory bodies.
We note your concerns and assure you that we will be further
investigating whether the Company has fulfilled its obligations under
the AIM Rules, specifically by ensuring any new developments in its
financial condition or performance have been notified without delay.
However, your concerns regarding lack of communication from the Company
and the Company's strategy to raise additional funds instead of
disposing unprofitable parts of the business are not within the remit of
the AIM Rules. You may wish instead to seek legal advice to further
pursue these concerns.
Yours sincerely
Dil
- 12 Oct 2006 18:30
- 142 of 172
What exactly is the complaint John , misleading statements ?
john50
- 12 Oct 2006 20:32
- 143 of 172
what is misleading you dil?
Dil
- 12 Oct 2006 23:33
- 144 of 172
This bit :
"specifically by ensuring any new developments in its
financial condition or performance have been notified without delay"
Is he suggesting that in the past satements made regarding the company's future have been deliberately misleading or to be nice , inaccurate and should have been reported as so via an RNS when it became obvious that was the case?
Cheers
kimboy12
- 13 Oct 2006 15:54
- 145 of 172
I think there are a good few misleading statements about.
What about the positive cash flow in Q1 but not in the first half. This was released the day before the AGM to head off the disgruntled investors. They then hit us with a 4.7m deficit in the first half when we saw the real results.
What about the "normalization of working capital" which the brokers told us would take up 4.2m of cash this year. This was supposed to be the explantion for all the fund raising and losing Lloyds as the banker. In fact it was a load of tosh and they were losing money because trading was terrible.
I am not sure if misleading your broker and then relying on them to mislead the shareholders counts.
There are numerous points where information is designed to mislead. I would also point to the raising of the ceiling price to the Vultures to 12p (those were the days) or the failure to announce the losing of the WH contract.
The story of YOO is a full of such instances.
Dil
- 13 Oct 2006 15:59
- 146 of 172
Be good if someone did decided to make an example of these bunch of crooks.
mcgrath1958
- 23 Oct 2006 10:44
- 147 of 172
well done Yoo , back to a Penny share!
hlyeo98
- 23 Oct 2006 12:25
- 148 of 172
Time to get out of YOO before its collapse.
potatohead
- 23 Oct 2006 12:29
- 149 of 172
this has been my best shorting stock ever!! Long may it continue
john50
- 23 Oct 2006 14:20
- 150 of 172
your well named potathead
hlyeo98
- 23 Oct 2006 16:00
- 151 of 172
Potatohead, did you go short on SEO and ZOO?
moneyplus
- 15 Nov 2006 15:00
- 152 of 172
spiking up today and holding---just maybe there might be good news coming???
hewittalan6
- 15 Nov 2006 15:05
- 153 of 172
It would have to be seismic to help my paltry holding :-(((
Alan