for more information about stanelco click on the links.

driver's research page link
http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/posts.php?tid=7681#lastread
website link
http://www.stanelco.co.uk/index.htm

Not sure wether this point regarding the statuary 120 day time frame required for
the other applications of Starpol, in the USA,has been made. On the 12th Oct. the RNS stated that they had approval for fruit and vegatables, and that the test on meat " was continuning ". Now its been 60 days since the RNS, that is 60 days +
the time taken to test for fruit and veg, or thats my reading of it.
Does anyone know how long the time frame for(F&V)trials lasted, i believe it would help to give some idea when we can expect news on the approval of the application.
cyril

cyril, its been worked out elsewhere as someone found out when the application went in. Think they said it would be Feb before the 120 days was up although whether weekend days etc counted was unclear....

chocbic,
Thanks for your reply, that means the trials started at
the time of the RNS. I'm am surprised they didn't all run
concurrently, so Feb it is.
cyril

The statutory time is the maximum not a fixed length of time, the FDA approval could just as easily arrive tomorrow, proof of this is that fruit and veg have already been passed within the 120 days.

Erik the Red

I tend to agree with Baza, that the ASDA update is the perfect time to announce Greenseal and Starpol from an ASDA perspective, a bit like the Walmart using Natureworks PLA announcement.

Erik the Red

Good morning all
The new box on persil washing capsules looks very frog pack like in its design, does any one elsa agree?
Heres to good news this week and a nice christmas present

lindosl

Erik,
Its a statuary requirement of 120 days.
Refer to post 1538, investors article 8870#
cyril

Is it not that the FDA's statutory period is for them to reach and announce its decision WITHIN 120 days - not necessarily wait until the end of 120 days ?

In other words they have as long as they need , but no more than 120 days ?

Well up 1p already.
whether its a requirement of 120 days or a maximum of 120 days (i think the latter) is hopefully a mute point. Good news this week, hopefully & Roll on the new year . Everythings going GREEN.
BLINGER with Envy. LOL

As I understand it re the 120 days period.
At any time during the statutory 120 days the FDA can give NONE approval. But approval can not be given prior to the end of the statutory period. The reason being that the 120 days is the period agreed on in order to assertain any adverse effects. Adverse effects can be found at any period during the 120 day trial, but obviously a set time has to be given for these effects to be discovered. IMHO of course.

greekman,
Thats how i believe the 120 day trial works.
cyril

Well, Baza,
I hope we get the RNS for year end this week cos I bugger off to Yanksville, USA for my hols on Saturday morning and I won't be back till the new year.
I'll miss all the fun!!
Alan

Cyril, I agree with Tony

How could the FDA possibly have given the green light for fruit and veg, in a lot less than 120 days, especially when they are only subdivisions of the same application ?

By your thoughts they would have had to wait for the whole 120 days, and they didn't.

I have just checked on the FDA website, and the law states that if the FDA do not object within 120 days the product can be marketed, but as is shown by the fruit and veg, they can approve it earlier as shown here

"Final letter - FDA is not required to issue a letter if it does not object to the marketing of the notified substance. However, FDA realizes that such a letter may serve to bring the review process to closure. Therefore, FDA expects to issue a letter to the notifier that includes information identifying the FCS that is the subject of the notification and the date on which the notification became effective."

Erik the Red

Alan, are you going anywhere near the Stanelco Inc office ?

Maybe you could pop in and say hello

Erik the Red

Dunno, Erik, Where is it????
Alan

Alan - I can understand your concern - and if it were me - with your shareholding - I would definitely not be going away to Florida with SEO in such a delicate state of play.

Now I also have some seo shares - but you have been such a good mate over the year and I feel that if it really helps - I would be prepared to sacrifice my own personal arrangements so you could stay behind and so that I could take your place. I do know for a fact that I can cancel my appointments next week - so if you feel the need - let me know and I will reluctantly stand in for you.

Baza, I couldn't possibly let you make such a huge personal sacrifice.
How would I sleep on a night, knowing you were being subjected to sunshine, beer and bikinis, while I had the pleasure of a cold Decemeber in Yorkshire, and sitting at a computer doing thankless things for thankless people.
No, it wouldn't be right. I must suffer this personally and view it as a kind of pilgrimage, and the 7.20 I have invested in SEO will have to look after itself.
But thanks for the kind offer.
Alan

my friend lives opposite the seo hq but they do not like unexpected visitors even though he is a shareholder.

US fda approval has probably already been granted, it was just a matter of going through the motions, as mentioned above it has already been granted approval for fruit & veg.

i think this is the last week for seo to announce the update,(6 weeks prior to the results)

Red Erik,

Just read your post which contained this extract.

I have just checked on the FDA website, and the law states that if the FDA do not object within 120 days the product can be marketed, but as is shown by the fruit and veg, they can approve it earlier as shown here .

This now leads me to believe that your interpetation is correct, and mine is wrong ( although still not certain ), re the FDA can aprove in less than 120 days.

Cheers Greekman

Alan - - but I insist - I will even make daily reports on the weather and state of the nation !!!!

Baza