Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

Pump & Dump Alert (PUMP)     

Gausie - 22 Jan 2006 09:47

o How Pump & Dump Works o What to do if you think you may be a victim o Current Pump & Dump Suspects [DMR] o Previous Pump & Dump Suspects o Links to key posts in this thread o External Links

This thread is work in progress, is reserved for a discussion of the Pump & Dump process, and to flag up UK stocks that people feel may be currently subject to that process. The intention is to keep the 'meat' of the content in the header, which will be frequently and regularly updated from any posts made to the thread. I'll also use the main thread as a change control to record and audit updates to the header.

If you have been the victim or perpetrator of a pump & dump, I would welcome your comments and stories (anonymously if preferred) as posts to the main thread. I will include extracts from them, and links to them in this header. If you prefer, you can click on my username and email me your stories through the MoneyAM internal mail system

How Pump & Dump Works

Pump and Dump schemes are a technique used by devious and immoral traders on thinly traded stocks to con unwitting and unsophisticated traders out of their savings and to make huge profits for themselves.

Candidate stocks are typically low liquidity penny shares with a history of low volume that suddenly hit the limelight when one or more energetic, enthusiastic and ebbulient posters 'discover' them and claim them as hidden gems. The usual scenario is that despite no change in the rate or quality of newsflow there is a rapid rise in volume, a disproportionate rise in price signifying accumulation and pump with little or no selling, an exhaustion peak and then a rapid return to previous levels or thereabouts, with our ebbulient posters moving on to pastures new. Price and volume usually then return to normality.

A pump and dump scheme usually has the perpetrator buying at low levels for some weeks prior to the pump stage, after which they promote the share, typically via BBs and/or mailing lists. They may buy a few during the pump and make sure everyone knows that they're buying, but they'll also sell a few more to take profits. It's the victims of the scheme who buy the shares the fraudster is selling.

When the fraudster thinks that she's unable to inflate the price any further, or has reached her profit targets, she'll start selling a lot harder. This is the 'Dump' stage of a pump and dump. She'll claim on the BBs that holders should 'keep the faith', she'll blame the shorters, she'll try to encourage people to top up and she'll promise lashings and lashings of jam tomorrow. She may buy a few and publicise the buys just to cover her tracks. But on the whole, she'll be selling.

At this point, the price may yoyo a little but the fraudster's selling is putting an overall downward pressure on the share price.

At some stage soon we get a 'race to the exit'. Some of the mugs who have been suckered in, start to realise what's happened and they too sell. The fraudster sees the sells, realises the game is up and dumps all of her remaining holdings.

The price drops, often by as much as 75% in a matter of days or hours. Those who are lucky enough to get out do so. The first ones to get out see a small profit or a small loss. Those who aren't so lucky typically leave the share certificate in a bottom drawer somewhere, determined to wait until they can get their money back before selling. Usually they never do. Some will wait forever, and have effectively lost their whole investment, others may sell a year or two later, perhaps at 1% of their purchase price.

What to do if you think you may be a victim

If you're reading this then you've already got over the first hurdle - denial. Most traders suckered into these schemes refuse to recognise that they're being conned despite warning signs that are so obvious in retrospect. A significant number remain in denial for many years after the price has collapsed and never get around to selling - a phenomenom psychiatrists call 'cognitive dissonance'.

If you've bought into a pump and dump and have recognised it for what it is, you're probably wondering what to do. Chances are, you're thinking "I can't sell yet cos its not quite covered my buy price .... just a few more fractions of a penny and I'm out".

So What do you do?

Firstly - you need to ensure that the money you have invested into the share is within your comfort zone. Ask yourself "Will I mind if I lose it all?" If the answer is "no, I'm happy to lose the lot", then play this however you see fit. Maybe you'll make some money, maybe you'll lose your entire investment.

If it's "I daren't lose it all, I wont be able to face my bank manager /partner /kids /parents /landlord/ gasman" (delete as appropriate) then you need to take a long hard look at the way you trade, and you *must* reduce the size of your holding to the level where you don't mind losing all of what's left - even if you have to take a small loss on the tranche that you sell. Bad tasting medicine, I know, but infinitely preferable to the alternative. Get yourself onto a risk management course. I would expect www.glomtc.com to run courses along these lines.

Although pump and dump schemes are illegal worldwide, succesful prosecutions are rare and almost non-existant in the UK. The highest publicity case in the USA related to a 14 year old boy who was eventually fined more than $250,000 having made much more than this through using internet BBs and spam mail to promote and then dump his penny stocks.

The highest profile UK case was probably the Daily Mirror City Slickers scandal that eventually came to court in November 2005. The court heard that Piers morgan bought 66,000 worth of Viglen shares the day before the Mirror tipped them. James Hipwell also bought 36,500 worth which he sold at 9.00am the next day for a profit of almost 20,000. Also tried was a BB Poster whose real name is Terry Shepherd - he was accused of forming part of the conspiracy.

Trade suspect shares if you must - but keep your wits about you.

Current Pump & Dump Suspects Dimension Resources - DMR
Chart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Code=DMR&SiEPIC: DMRName:Dimension ResourcesCategory: Illiquid Penny ShareNMS: 3000Current Phase: PUMPAccumulation Started: Around July 2005Pump Started: Late October 2005Dump Started: Awaiting Data
Previous Pump & Dump Suspects
CFS2004.jpgEPIC: CFPName:City Financial associatesCategory: Illiquid Penny ShareNMS: TinyAccumulation Started: est Jan 2004Pump Started: 31/03/2004Dump Started: 28/04/2004Maximum Loss To Victims: 81%
Links to posts within this thread Posts 2,3 and 4 on page 1 of this thread are typical indicators of the pump stage of a pump and dump scam. The scammer cross-posts buy recommendations for their stock on multiple threads, and points to their previous pump and dump scams as successes. Naturally, they only mention the low (where they bought) and the high (where they exited). The victims bought at those highs and will probably never see those prices again. Those victims have been well and truly conned out of their money, and many will never realise how and why they were deceived. External Links SEC Article Wikipedia 14 year old fraudster Investopedia link

Gausie - 26 Jan 2006 21:18 - 136 of 262

so long as you keep posting SH, it stays at the top.

Thank you.

chocolat - 26 Jan 2006 21:19 - 137 of 262

Ah - 'we', eh what SueHelen.

SueHelen - 26 Jan 2006 21:20 - 138 of 262

If I want a laugh after work I come over to this thread......such a laugh...see Gausie has spent all day here...I thought you were off Gausie....ain't got nowt better to do yet.

SueHelen - 26 Jan 2006 21:21 - 139 of 262

Yeah wanna keep it at the top...when news start coming from DMR....wanna show you for what you really are Gausie.

dominic simpson esq - 26 Jan 2006 21:23 - 140 of 262

Daves wife Veronica has nicked his razor blades.

48838e6073ff021baa0a96cbec9e6f59_cn_scre

chocolat - 26 Jan 2006 21:23 - 141 of 262

You don't know any of us for what we really are SueHelen.
But some of us have the measure of you.

Gausie - 26 Jan 2006 21:23 - 142 of 262

lol

SueHelen - 26 Jan 2006 21:25 - 143 of 262

Complete washout in operation..

This thread should now die.

dominic simpson esq - 26 Jan 2006 21:29 - 144 of 262

Veronica was a hairy child.
Goodnight all
dominic simpson esq (a man with hairy friends)

HairyBaby.jpg

SueHelen - 26 Jan 2006 21:30 - 145 of 262

Should let the dogs loose on this thread....

blinger - 26 Jan 2006 21:34 - 146 of 262

lololol!!!!!!!!!!!!
the dogs ARE loose on this thread and they are SUCH fun

hahahahahahahahahah!!!!!

SueHelen - 26 Jan 2006 21:35 - 147 of 262

Really should...maybe let Blinger loose with all the anger he's build up because of failures.

Fundamentalist - 26 Jan 2006 22:36 - 148 of 262

The only people who want this thread dead are those who feel threatened by what its trying to achieve - now i wonder who that could be?

Dil - 26 Jan 2006 23:30 - 149 of 262

Gausie , this thread is invaluable to newcomers and although I admit to fingering Sue first and often it has given me no joy.

If she just relaxed and chilled a bit I am sure she would enjoy the experience a lot more and could become one of the leading heads on the board and instead of suckering kids could offer a new angle to many of us oldies.

Regards

Dil - 26 Jan 2006 23:31 - 150 of 262

lol

drunker50 - 27 Jan 2006 00:40 - 151 of 262

1 lesson i have learned in my 2 years watching mam threads.

DON'T LISTEN TO SUE HELEN !!!!!!.

jimmy b - 27 Jan 2006 01:32 - 152 of 262



This is a very boring thread ..

MightyMicro - 28 Jan 2006 11:12 - 153 of 262

Returning biefly to the matter in hand (as it were), I've watched with morbid fascination for some time the goings-on at Tadpole Technology (TAD). Recent events, namely the disposal of the Streaming Division (half of which they had only recently bought!) would suggest that this has again become a prime P&D candidate.

All those who thought that their fortunes would be made by some deal with Microsoft to deliver software using Tadpole's stuff must be waking up to horrible reality -- it was never going to happen.

So, how to get out, then? Let's see . . .

blinger - 28 Jan 2006 12:11 - 154 of 262

TAD has been P&d for 20 years now.

hewittalan6 - 28 Jan 2006 16:59 - 155 of 262

Another rule for the P & D maestro. If anyone asks you a difficult question, ignore it, abuse the questioner and finally try to move them away by disrupting a thread on a share they are long on.
See todays DMR and SEO threads for a master class.
Register now or login to post to this thread.