Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

stanelco .......a new thread (SEO)     

bosley - 20 Feb 2004 09:34

Chart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Code=SEO&SiChart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Code=SEO&Si

for more information about stanelco click on the links.

driver's research page link
http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/posts.php?tid=7681#lastread
website link
http://www.stanelco.co.uk/index.htm


Treblewide - 15 Dec 2005 19:14 - 13694 of 27111

Tom who? does he mention their ridiclous valuation? and how the sp could easily half and it would still have a ridiculous valuation...cannot see how a few contracts justify 150M?

Bugz - 15 Dec 2005 19:22 - 13695 of 27111

He writes the Red Hot Penny Share Newsletter and offers investment advice etc.....

Personally, thats all I know about the bloke! He does seems to have some dort of cred on here though....... I have no idea how 'on the mark' he actually is.

explosive - 15 Dec 2005 19:25 - 13696 of 27111

LOLOL Treblewide....... Can see 4 posts above yours where pisces say Tom Bullford...... Erm maybe not!! Explains why you are unable to justify 150M..

hewittalan6 - 15 Dec 2005 19:53 - 13697 of 27111

explosive, Bugz.
I can not see who hes replying to but since I only have one person squelched I must assume it is our noble lord blinger.
If this is the case then he is baiting you, please either take the option I did, and squelch him, or thank him profoundly for pointing out how stupid we all are, listening to also ran idiots like KBC Peel, when we have our own royal tipster to give such solid advice. After all, what could KBC possibly know about shares.
You must excuse him, it is the generations of inbreeding and not his fault.
I am undecided whether treblewide is our chinless wonder in disguise. For now I will just say "investment strategy".
SEO is in direct negotiations with Asda, Wallmart and the major suppliers of Coca Cola and MacDonalds. No, their current earnings and profit / loss does not stack up against the SP, but on some shares, one takes a gamble for potentially high rewards, which would undoubtedly come if just one of those negotiations concludes succesfully. Who's to say when that will happen. Tommorow, January, Summer, 2007? Pay your money, take your choice.
Finally, the sp equation you are doing does not include conversions for Asda, which are ongoing and, according to the last RNS, on schedule.
Not your idea of a good buy? Fine, goodbye. But please refrain from trying to ridicule serious people who are in full knowledge of the risk to their capital and happy with it.
Alan

Treblewide - 15 Dec 2005 20:16 - 13698 of 27111

he has a reputation on here because free bulletin boards are full of people who do not have real knowledge of investing in shares so hang onto the advice of these guys...if the guy were so good he would be a multi-millionaire from investing in shares and would not be writing for a rag that costs a few quid every month

for hewitt...i aint ridiculing anyone I am just asking some questions of the valuation...is that wrong...is the thread only for those people who are bullish on it?

maybe you should have a word with the people who put up pictures.....i am asking some questions...fair enough an ASDA contrcat which "might" be worth 5m......so best case scenario is break even or small profit overall for the year.......and a turover of maybe 7M this year...this is not a 150M company......

or am i not allowed to have a bearish opinion on it?

hewittalan6 - 15 Dec 2005 20:24 - 13699 of 27111

You can have a bearish opinion if you so wish.
To post a Tom who post just 4 posts after it was spelled out clearly, smells of the kind of baiting that the nob in the ermine does.
But please remember that a historical calculation of the sp is exactly that. Historical, whereas share purchasing is about calculating the possible or probable sp from future activities.
Now, your calculation includes zero future activities, whereas KBC think future profits are sufficient to justify a higher price, hence their buy message.
Please inform us what it is you know that KBC have so negligently missed, or is your assertation that your strategum is a more succesfull one than theirs?
Alan

driver - 15 Dec 2005 20:25 - 13700 of 27111

Treblewide
You are allowed to have an opinion but you havent done your home work start by reading all of the Research Page if you can be bothered and then give an opinion, if in your opinion its negative then go and invest elsewhere and leave us alone.
http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/posts.php?tid=7681#lastread

qchalmers - 15 Dec 2005 20:25 - 13701 of 27111

I would rather listen to TB than guys like blinger who has little if anything worth hearing.

hewittalan6 - 15 Dec 2005 20:28 - 13702 of 27111

Driver, as always, succinct and to the point. Thank you.
My motto? Why use 5 words when 20000 will do.
Alan

Treblewide - 15 Dec 2005 20:32 - 13703 of 27111

KBC...yip we all know brokers have the general public's interest at heart when they recommend shares...dont be so naive.....so let me get this right....let me point something out...I have taken a short position.....so i now have an interest in the share......what some of you seem to be suggesting is that no one is interested in a bit of reality/the other side of the coin on the thread......i dont care.......it is not and in my opinion never will be worth 150M.

hewittalan6 - 15 Dec 2005 20:37 - 13704 of 27111

Thats fine TW. You have stated your position, we know your opinion. When you have any decent facts to post you are very welcome to, it is a free country.
Please understand if we choose to ignore someone who has nothing to say other than "I know better than a) you lot, and b) professionals, who lie anyway, despite the fact that lying will get them a hefty fine.
I suggest, screaming lord sutch and yourself start your own SEO shorters thread, then you will not have to listen to us misguided idiots.
Alan

Treblewide - 15 Dec 2005 20:53 - 13705 of 27111

i'm alright here actually...ta

blinger - 15 Dec 2005 21:03 - 13706 of 27111

lololol!!!!!!!!

Bitch slapping in progress, and the price will dive tomorrow!!!!!!!!!!

hewittalan6 - 15 Dec 2005 21:07 - 13707 of 27111

Hmm, TW another one of the no-nothings, who have sad little lives devoted to trying to wind people up, but with the level of his ability, he should find a primary school playground BB.
Nothing intelligent to say. No decent evidence to back his ridiculous claims and unable to answer questions put to him.
I am afraid he will have to join the famous lord chav in the rejects room where they can outbid each other on the low. Squelched.
Anyone remember the ermine clad nob suggesting 10p by now?
Alan

bhunt1910 - 15 Dec 2005 21:19 - 13708 of 27111

Ah but Alan - he is right - the price might go down tomorrow - but I think we all know that and we have (least ways I know I have) - factored that in. Then again - it might go up. I suspect most of us are in this for the long term and recognise the risks as well as the massive potential this share has. Thats the joy of he chase

I am not in this to gain a few quid over the next couple of days or even weeks - I am in this because I see massive potential over the long term which in my view outweigh those risks.

If I want to make a few quid guaranteed over the short term - I guess I could go out to work - but where is the fun in that.
I am in this eyes fully open.

Am I bovvered by what they say

Do I look bovvered

hewittalan6 - 15 Dec 2005 21:27 - 13709 of 27111

D'accord, Baza.
My annoyance is at the temerity of people who give no justification, just give snide comments about brokers deliberately lying. You know my background. This simply does not happen at brokers like KBC. It is not worth their while.
This made me suspicious of TW. His answer to the invite to create a shorters thread confirmed it. Another pre-pubescent trouble maker.
Ye Gods. Better out than in.
Alan

PS. I really dont care if it hits tuppence tomorrow. Like you, I am in for a long haul and accept the ups and downs. I tried trading but slight mistiming and broker fees made this less profitable than I would wish, so my only interest is in cost price versus 2010 price.

ssanebs - 15 Dec 2005 21:39 - 13710 of 27111

i hope all the shorters create nice big positions ahead of the trading update

Treblewide - 15 Dec 2005 21:54 - 13711 of 27111

i have a sad life because i shorted a share?, i think hewit that you are too attached to this share.....you seem to get very emotive about SEO..not good for making rational judgements.....no justification about brokers lying....do you remember Informix? MCI, Enron?

can you justify the valuation?

lets look at it this way...say 5m from Asda....another 1M from other contracts....what is the production and on going support costs...so they might make a 1 OR 1.5mbottom line profit from Asda ...their net cash outflow last year was about 2.5M before the placing.

They will probably loose another 1.5-2M this year...only leaving 6 months worth of cash...........hugley over valued.

or can you justify it hewit without getting personal?

andysmith - 15 Dec 2005 22:11 - 13712 of 27111

Havn't posted for a while as not much new to say, still have original shares from 5.45p locked away but looking for the right time to invest again having taken my profits on the rest at 21p a few months back.
I am not expecting major news on Greenseal, in fact possibly delays due to Christmas production schedules at packers, I wouldn't retrofit a machine in a key earning period. 2006 will be key for Greenseal, if it doesn't breakthrough significantly at the end of the exclusivity with Asda then SEO will need more to justify the current sp and here comes Starpol.
Starpol will be the company maker but one thing to consider, current capacity is not enough long-term and this will need to be addressed if SEO are to capitalise in a big way on current environmental thinking of major retailers and fast-food chains.
Investors need news on deals very soon, not more discussions and possibilities in the pipeline. Poor results (expected or not), possible delays to Asda agreement and looming cc issue may provide better buying opportunities ahead for what still looks like a major potential success story in the years ahead.
Just an opinion but can still buy back in below the price I sold and still waiting.

hewittalan6 - 15 Dec 2005 22:17 - 13713 of 27111

Good to see you back, Andy.
Well reasoned as always.
SEO did increase the PLA order for the manufacture of Starpol. Why do you think there may be a capacity problem? Capital equipment or consumable shortage?
Alan
Register now or login to post to this thread.