content/uploads/2012/02/091607_Conch_Shoot_3071.jpg" alt="" />

Welcome to CONCHA PLC (formerly Hot Tuna (International) PLC.

The stated aims of CONCHA PLC are to evaluate and invest in a broad range of
technology, media, well being and related industries.


Company History

Hot Tuna was born in Australia in the summer of 1969 to serve the demands of sojourning surfers, the product of a dedicated surfer�s passion fueled by the skill of his fashion designer wife. Spreading on the bodies and boards of watermen through coastal locales in the South Pacific, the brand quickly burgeoned globally, becoming an influential leader in the nascent surf industry and one of the progenitors of the neon era of surf in the '80s. Through the brand�s storied history, a long list of notables, in and out of the water, have waved the Hot Tuna banner at one time or another in their careers, including pro surfers such as Richie Lovett, Robbie Page, Beau Emerton and Drew Courtney.

In September 2005, Hot Tuna (International) PLC purchased the Hot Tuna brand from a consortium of investors and listed it on AIM, a division of the London Stock Exchange.

In the interest of managing its brand profile and distribution globally, the public Company began a rapid acquisition of its licensed interests around the world. Talented designers and key management with apparel business expertise from Quiksilver, O�Neill, Ocean Pacific, Rip Curl and Perry Ellis International, among others, were recruited to drive the process in the key markets of the United States, Australia and the United Kingdom. In July 2006, entrepreneur and fashion icon Elle Macpherson, who grew-up with the brand in Australia, was appointed as an executive director of Hot Tuna (International) PLC, her interests focused on design and distribution issues, as well as overall youth fashion and market insight. The Company's name change to Concha Plc (AIM Ticker: CHA) will become effective and the Company will begin trading under its new name from 8:00 a.m. on 7 February 2012.

http://www.conchaplc.com/

67% profit LOL.... you having trouble with your numbers again....

in the meantime, having slagged off shortie, perhaps you'ld like to be rather more honest and open about your questionable calls, which QPP most assuredly is, at least for now ..... none of us know the future

Don't forget ASC also, posting as Tomasz, or blinkx posting as Galatica....

He went back and edited a post making out he sold COMS too for a profit before it tanked.

The guy is a laff a minute.

nevertheless, the call here was actually pretty good, though for reasons already stated, i wouldn't go near it

Born losers, STAKERS and on top lying through and through

re -COM
the profit was minimal by my standards and sold as the shares were not going anywhere, ( all said on the thread ) the shares tanked a week or 10 days later

edit - looked at spread sheet, says buy 10 march on a T +20 at 7.40p closing on a T+14 at 7.82p on 18 March

They tanked before you edited an old post panto as did BLNX just after one of your bargain top up's.

Your a clown .... and where do you get 60%+ from these ???

Maths as well as English lessons required me thinks.

The call here was buy at .66 maybe at best, sold half @ 1.00 at the best. Factor in buying and selling fees also and Panto would have been lucky if he made 30% with a large transaction.

Shortie

you do have to go to school, event taking your figures gives a 51% profit not 30%, and the prices of buying and selling were better than those you said

I did not sell half but 1 lot of the two I had

one lot of two = half at my primary school

Shortie, short yourself out, you will not catch me cos I post what I do ...............

Below was my first post and that was my second buy on the day at that price 0.6574p the share were moving very fast that day, it finished 0.10p up, the one I sold was bough at 0.62p earlier.

panto - 07 Apr 2014 14:49 - 53 of 145
Paying full offer 0.66p earlier 0.6574p was the norm, must be ready for the next move

re- one lot of two = half at my primary school

not cynic
because one lot was bigger than the other, so go to primary school to learn maths

you lot not good for anything but CHAT, CHAT AND CHAT, so go to the nosence threat and do it there

so bugger off back to menorca then (another of your aliases too)

so did you sell the bigger half or the smaller half?

Another frustated one, can not win with the truth

bugger off ............. you and you family deserve what you lot got, now on the past and the future is my answer

I make sure I did not post my sell here at the time cos I knew some buggers may follow me again ( and do the wrong thing )

so I posted my sell at the IOF thread.........

panto - 24 Apr 2014 11:00 - 118 of 119
re - Dead cat bounce first thing tomorrow?

It has so I bought some at 25.50p, lets see how much is the bounce
took some large profits on another stock, and IOF was a good candidate

But none of us deserve you.

you are a very sad man with such a huge chip on his shoulder
it's a shame really, as some of your posts are actually good and interesting, but you are totally incapable of keeping a civil tongue in your head or being other than obnoxious

Panto, you need to chill out and stop being so aggressive towards anyone who doesn't agree with you. Also read my last post again, I said also factor in buying and selling fees...

Most of us disagree from time to time, the difference is we don't post abusive comments to each other, there's no need for it, unless of course your only here looking to attack others.

Did I sold at the top, well it was a few minutes before 11am, and I got 1.04 for 1M

not very often do sell at best time and price, but is was IOF fault as already went much higher than I was ready to pay at that time.



Market Makers Level 2 is 250K but trading large sizes all the time

shortie

stop talking nonsence, you have been the one with abusive comment ( go back to your past posts )
I only retaliate on the case of cynic for ejample

fees - naturally one has to deduct that, but on saying profits one is talking about buying/ selling price.
sure is not for Tax purposes