overgrowth
- 06 Oct 2003 22:47
AdieH
- 27 Jun 2007 09:02
- 1386 of 2037
Nice to see it ticking up towards 40p mark again, if the results are positive and news on roll outs should break 40p mark again... As the saying goes shares don't go up in straight lines and this is showing that right now... If you had the bottle nice profit in the last couple of weeks for short termers...
David10B
- 27 Jun 2007 09:57
- 1387 of 2037
Good morning AdieH
YES ITS TICKING UP AGAIN WE CAN ALL SEE THAT.
THEREFORE NO REAL NEED FOR YOUR COMMENTS, WHICH IN FACT PROMPT ME TO SAY THAT ALL DECENT COMPANIES WOULD NOW BE PUTING OUT AN RNS CLEARLY STATING THAT THEY SEE NO REASON FOR THE SP RISE WHICH IS PURELY SPECULATIVE.
ptholden
- 27 Jun 2007 10:24
- 1388 of 2037
David10B
That has to be one of silliest comments made on this thread to date. So everytime a comapny's SP rises they should put out a RNS stating they see no reason for the rise? LoL
pth
David10B
- 27 Jun 2007 10:35
- 1389 of 2037
Obviously you dont follow the plot as a lot of companies do this, as for example MLR the other day, I frankly dont see the need for it but they do it.
ptholden
- 27 Jun 2007 10:42
- 1390 of 2037
Obviously I don't and I must bow to your superior knowledge of the markets. By the way, can you point me to the RNS where MLR stated that they know of no reason to the movement in their SP?
pth
AdieH
- 27 Jun 2007 10:42
- 1391 of 2037
Squelched David myself but guess its the same old drivel coming from David. IanT please monitor this board as there only seems to be one person trying to ruin the thread... and before David comes back with balanced view please look at the past history and his disgusting attack on Richard Worthington (who has been informed of this personal vendetta and actually no foundation for these rants)... As stated I have squelched David and would suggest anyone with an interest in COH should do the same as he shouldn't be allowed to ruin this thread for potential and existing holders of COH. Regards.
David10B
- 27 Jun 2007 11:55
- 1392 of 2037
Sure PTH its right here.
Maelor Stmnt re Share Price Movement
RNS Number:4238Y
Maelor PLC
15 February 2006
15 February 2006
Maelor plc
The Directors of Maelor note the recent rise in the Company's share price and
are not aware of any specific external events that may have caused the rise.
During the week, the Company achieved the return in-house of Volplex, Maelor's
treatment for hypovolaemia, enabling the Company to focus directly on increasing
sales and market share. Despite the de-stocking process involved in returning
Volplex from a distributor, Company turnover for the second half of the year is
anticipated to be in line with the levels seen in the first six months.
Operating losses are likely to half in the final six months of the year relative
to the first six months, ahead of expectations.
The Directors are pleased with the progress of the recently announced strategic
review, which they expect to complete on schedule and be in a position to update
the market in parallel with year end results.
Further information:
Tim Wright, CEO Maelor plc
01978 810 153
Ben Atwell, Financial Dynamics
020 7831 3113
David10B
- 27 Jun 2007 13:25
- 1393 of 2037
There are no disgusting attacks on Mr Worthington or anyone, the facts are fairly presented as they occurred.
I am more than prepared to offer the most sincere apologies for any misrepresentation and will withdraw the offending post immediately.
ptholden
- 27 Jun 2007 19:54
- 1394 of 2037
Obviously you dont follow the plot as a lot of companies do this, as for example MLR the other day, I frankly dont see the need for it but they do it.
The other day? Feb 2006 - over 16 months ago, hardly the other day! Rather misleading I'm afraid. In any event something like a 10% rise in any company's SP over a period of a few days hardly calls for an explanatory RNS, get a grip David10B and be sensible.
pth
David10B
- 27 Jun 2007 20:27
- 1395 of 2037
My, my, my doesnt time fly, I thought you were more interested in the principle rather than the timing.
cynic
- 27 Jun 2007 20:41
- 1396 of 2037
time to shut up 10B ..... sorry, but you really do get monotonous after a while
AdieH
- 27 Jun 2007 20:42
- 1397 of 2037
ptholden I would not bother engaging this person in debate, I rather suspect he is losing the plot, he has a problem with Richard Worthington and that is it and any other comments are steming from this issue. Would suggest you Squelch him also as he will just keep trying to destroy this board. If he cannot see the benefit of investing in COH then that is his perogative but he brings nothing to this board so squelch him. Regards.
David10B
- 27 Jun 2007 21:08
- 1398 of 2037
I know cynic no need to apologise.
It just that I realise that many a star has made the fatal mistake of not responding to their fans.
And I honestly believe that its important that potential investors are aware of the CEO of COH failures in the UK.
If we are to be enlightened investors, then surely enlightened we must be.
And my aimiable friend, the only thing enlightenment every destroyed was pure ignorance----was it not?
?
ptholden
- 27 Jun 2007 21:13
- 1399 of 2037
Adie
There is an advantage sometimes in engaging certain people in debate and sometimes not. On this occasion David10B has amply demonstrated his ample ignornace and has shown that rather than engage in sensible debate is quite frankly full of shit. By exposing their spurious arguments it helps maintain a balanced thread, rather than leaving the 'field' to their idiocy. You don't really have to worry about what this pillock posts, even the greenest newbie is popping ribs, splitting his sides with laughter.
David10B
I think you will find it was you who was more engaged in the principle than I. The other day was actually 16 months ago! I asked you to illustrate the 'other day' and you came up with a historical fact; as Cynic says, 'time to shut up'. Talk about grasping at straws! You don't really have to work hard at making yourself look stupid do you? Comes naturally - LoL
Cue 'Ian, they are been rude to me, I want to complain' screeched in a high nasal, whining, nasal voice, accompanied by dummy being spat out and a high pitched wail.
pth
ptholden
- 27 Jun 2007 21:18
- 1400 of 2037
'It just that I realise that many a star has made the fatal mistake of not responding to their fans'
See what I mean Adie, he's a laughing stock. Delusions of grandeur abound. What he doesn't seem to realise is that everyone on this Board orignailly thought he was a total pratt, and with comments like this everyone now KNOWS he's a complete pratt. You really couldn't make it up. Great entertainement value, if nothing else.
pth
David10B
- 27 Jun 2007 22:25
- 1401 of 2037
Whatever entertains you chaps it bothers me not as it still does not alter the fact that Don Millars failed and BKE under Mr Worthingtin seemingly exists just to provide pay for the board of directors.
With so many small shareholders being seen as rip off fodder these days--- THERE IS AN OBVIOUS NEED TO QUESTION IF MR WORTHINGTON WOULD DO THE SAME AT COH
OH yes bye the way it was Mr Hurford of Fishponds that ran to IAN first not I., as you can be as nasty to me in as much quantity as you think may alter the facts.
Good night fans!
AdieH
- 27 Jun 2007 22:28
- 1402 of 2037
I can't see his response as i've squelched him, I gave him ample opportunity to respond in civil manner but he personally attacked RW without foundation. Ian is monitoring the and hope he will take the correct action at some point. I realised a while ago that this bloke is a complete prat and his only agenda is to ruin this thread. Lets just get back to COH please... Regards.
beemer2
- 27 Jun 2007 22:45
- 1403 of 2037
MY 40P+ PREDICTION GETTING CLOSER BY THE DAY...
bmw325
David10B
- 28 Jun 2007 09:44
- 1404 of 2037
Good morning Gentlemen.
AdieH please get it right, I dont mind you shooting the messenger but please use a gun and not a dagger in the back.
There is nothing uncivil in my posts, but the truth hurts.
There is no attatck on RW as you continually claim!
What I state is just a plain simple and honest assessment of the facts suurrounding his failure at BKE and subsequent pillage of company assests/ funds which incidentally continues to this day in the form of wages to inactive and inappropriate company officiers who are certaiting acting more for themselves than the sharesholders' rights.
Let me put it another way you claim I have no foundation to critiscise RW then you tell this BB what other FD would allow the outflow of salaries for no returns to shareholders funds and assets?--NAME ME JUST ONE.
I do not set out to run this thread, you were doing a thoroughly eramping good old job before I cam---I SET OUT TO BRING AND ENLIGHTENED BALANCE---presnted in the most civilised of manners.
Prat or not Don Millars failed under Worthington and BKE is being run for the benifit of the directors' wage packets and not shareholders interests, and with a barrage of excuses for a poor performace while PLC s such as CARL forge powerfully ahead.
DO HAVE A REALLY NICE DAY---I WILL
beemer2
- 28 Jun 2007 09:59
- 1405 of 2037
Tenby
Nearly at 40p...once again you have got it wrong, it makes me wonder how you make money in this game.