Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

stanelco .......a new thread (SEO)     

bosley - 20 Feb 2004 09:34

Chart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Code=SEO&SiChart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Code=SEO&Si

for more information about stanelco click on the links.

driver's research page link
http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/posts.php?tid=7681#lastread
website link
http://www.stanelco.co.uk/index.htm


bosley - 31 Dec 2005 13:21 - 13918 of 27111

and that was that!! another year over, a new one just around the corner. what a ride this year has been!! a fantastic first six months and then followed by a disappointing six months, but , as mad pad and garyble have rightly pointed out , the sp is a damn sight higher than it was this time last year. so, all in all, things ain't that bad.
personally speaking, the seo ride this year has been thrilling and educational. for me, it has been a wonderful learning experience in the importance of taking profits, stop losses, technical analysis and following trends. (you just cant fight the market!!)
a happy new year to you all.

garyble - 31 Dec 2005 14:23 - 13919 of 27111

Yep, you're absolutely correct, 10% in a week and every week would certainly yield >200% APR, 1410% to be precise, well I never, If I were you, I'd have made 21.2m on SEO this past year alone, and who says its a dog!

I make the assumption that most were in pre-10p as they were certainly on the bb's before me. So although a missed oportunity at 31p, still the potential to far exceed that.

Having reached 31p on pure hype, it is surely reasonable to conslude that it will be revisted with significant revenue etc, etc...

Looks great for 2006, so good fortune to all and Happy New Year.

blinger - 31 Dec 2005 15:12 - 13920 of 27111

erm one week at
+10% would do the trick, thats an APR of +500%, and the cash is freed to trade more shares too, as for your assumption that 30p can be re-attained, so too can 2p, its a dog,which has had its day, and I think you all know it in your heart of hearts.

JJS - 03 Jan 2006 08:57 - 13921 of 27111


Strange tick up today on little volume, is there news coming, or a big order has been placed ?

Anyone heard anything ?

greekman - 03 Jan 2006 10:44 - 13922 of 27111

Don't think so. The whole market is up. Good feeling sentiment.

explosive - 03 Jan 2006 18:36 - 13923 of 27111

Bling - "erm one week at
+10% would do the trick, thats an APR of +500%, and the cash is freed to trade more shares too, as for your assumption that 30p can be re-attained, so too can 2p, its a dog,which has had its day, and I think you all know it in your heart of hearts."

2p mate, thought 8p was about as low as you predicted this would go????

hewittalan6 - 03 Jan 2006 19:13 - 13924 of 27111

Don't rise to it explosive. He only comes on to try and wind people up. Just ignore him (Like everyone else does) or filter him (Like I do).
A combination of being ignored and this share bobbing along without any real movement for a while, until the finals are out, may be just enough that he'll push off to another playground to brandish his undoubted wit and superior intelligence.
Alan

explosive - 03 Jan 2006 19:17 - 13925 of 27111

Hi Alan, Happy new year mate... Just wanted to see where the 2p came from thats all, I expect that this calculation is far too complex for a simple earthling like me though!!

blinger - 03 Jan 2006 19:28 - 13926 of 27111

Oh dear poor old explosive diaoreah is in denial, my point was (brownie points to you lol) was that it HAD reached 30p, therefore as it started off at 2p there was no reason why it couldn`t return there AGAIN.
I made no forecast,merely mentioned its` high/lows, so, more lies from rampers anon. again then?

Its a dog which had a big bounce from 2p, its` bounce is over, its really easy, and when it loses the court case against BPRG (I am long that one), it will sink again.

Don`t forget now chaps, this is a SetsMM (SSMM) share nown , no BS about `tree shaking, mm`s playing games etc`. as it falls, as it will, and did again today.

explosive - 03 Jan 2006 19:35 - 13927 of 27111

linger - oh right, your just stating the obvious then. Same could be said about every share on the market... You'll be pleased to know I understand yes.. Sink or fly though makes no odds to me, I've made my 40+% and moved on for the moment.

blinger - 03 Jan 2006 19:55 - 13928 of 27111

good lad, I knew I would convince you-lol
Blimey you really HAVE got your rampers head on today,a total of 8 shares, wow.

explosive - 03 Jan 2006 20:07 - 13929 of 27111

Keep shorting boy, there are plenty like me that have this on watch and will be back in on positive news. Your court case is a joke as realy makes no odds to the potential, if it did you'd have been rambling on about this for months now.

I bet the only reason why you actully watch this thread so eagerly is for a heads up when the buy back begins so you don't get caught!!

blinger - 03 Jan 2006 20:18 - 13930 of 27111

Nah I watch it for a laugh at the rampers, you know the people who insist that share prices ALWAYS rise, who never sell, take a profit, or do anything but "topped up wiv a foo today, mite", you know the ones, a scream aren`t they?

ps what on earth is a "heads up"?, sounds vaguely gynaecological,

hewittalan6 - 04 Jan 2006 11:04 - 13931 of 27111

Anyone read the BPRG release today?
How do you all read this ref. the upcoming court case?
There is a train of thought that says BPRG have assembled this committee of experts to seek out new markets and new uses for BPRG technology because they perceive themselves as been second to SEO in the marketing and applications.
The other train of thought is that they are positioning themselves to leverage the maximum possible from a court victory that would give them free reign over the field.
Interesting to know what others think about it. The market, generally, doesn't seem impressed.
Alan

Fred1new - 04 Jan 2006 11:12 - 13932 of 27111

Maybe I am gullible, but the release could also be taken as face value as it would seem sensible approach. The only thing I would like to know is, what are the remunnerations!

hewittalan6 - 04 Jan 2006 11:19 - 13933 of 27111

Agree, Fred. Face value is a possibility. It would just seem a little ill timed to employ several very expensive people to promote, explore and market a technology that is subject to a court case over patent ownership, in the month that case is due to be resolved, unless you were confident of the outcome.
I am a sceptical sort and can't help feeling that the company would have used these advisors on a freelance basis anyway, so why set them up as a panel and then announce it to the stockmarket?
Could it be an SEO no news type release, where the subtext and effect is more important than anything it actually states?
Alan

Sharesure - 04 Jan 2006 11:28 - 13934 of 27111

Alan, looks like just so much hot air to me. Advisory Boards do not have a great deal of clout in my experience and I doubt that much can be expected of them.
The market in both SEO and BPRG shares seems to think the same. From all conversations I have had with those nearer to the court case they seem to view it as insignificant in both chances of success and impact on SEO, their only proviso being that litigation is usually never straightforward so might spring a surprise. My conclusion is that the risks of adverse impact from the cc are small and probably in the sp already.

hewittalan6 - 04 Jan 2006 11:35 - 13935 of 27111

You're probably right, Sharesure, but its nice to have something to discuss, rather than just hurling insults and dropping in silly forecasts for the future sp. :-)
Alan

rpaco - 04 Jan 2006 12:51 - 13936 of 27111

Probably the same phenomena that makes a price jump 2 days before it is tipped in Shares mag. It's been said that the price would have gone up anyway due to other factors, but why does it then wait until just before it's tipped in the press. You can see this happen almost every week. If it were at the crack of dawn on publication day or at midnight when shares goes online here it would be undersandable but its always the day before.
Sorry to ramble a bit but the drop yesterday allowed me to top up furthe on SEO.
Hoping the results at the end of the month will justify my faith in the potential. (which as a main substitute for petrochem plastic source material is almost unlimited)

rpaco - 04 Jan 2006 12:57 - 13937 of 27111

Ahh sorry chaps sound asleep! posted about old item on last page.(which strangely re-occured again today)
Register now or login to post to this thread.