bosley
- 20 Feb 2004 09:34
greekman
- 03 Jan 2006 10:44
- 13922 of 27111
Don't think so. The whole market is up. Good feeling sentiment.
explosive
- 03 Jan 2006 18:36
- 13923 of 27111
Bling - "erm one week at
+10% would do the trick, thats an APR of +500%, and the cash is freed to trade more shares too, as for your assumption that 30p can be re-attained, so too can 2p, its a dog,which has had its day, and I think you all know it in your heart of hearts."
2p mate, thought 8p was about as low as you predicted this would go????
hewittalan6
- 03 Jan 2006 19:13
- 13924 of 27111
Don't rise to it explosive. He only comes on to try and wind people up. Just ignore him (Like everyone else does) or filter him (Like I do).
A combination of being ignored and this share bobbing along without any real movement for a while, until the finals are out, may be just enough that he'll push off to another playground to brandish his undoubted wit and superior intelligence.
Alan
explosive
- 03 Jan 2006 19:17
- 13925 of 27111
Hi Alan, Happy new year mate... Just wanted to see where the 2p came from thats all, I expect that this calculation is far too complex for a simple earthling like me though!!
blinger
- 03 Jan 2006 19:28
- 13926 of 27111
Oh dear poor old explosive diaoreah is in denial, my point was (brownie points to you lol) was that it HAD reached 30p, therefore as it started off at 2p there was no reason why it couldn`t return there AGAIN.
I made no forecast,merely mentioned its` high/lows, so, more lies from rampers anon. again then?
Its a dog which had a big bounce from 2p, its` bounce is over, its really easy, and when it loses the court case against BPRG (I am long that one), it will sink again.
Don`t forget now chaps, this is a SetsMM (SSMM) share nown , no BS about `tree shaking, mm`s playing games etc`. as it falls, as it will, and did again today.
explosive
- 03 Jan 2006 19:35
- 13927 of 27111
linger - oh right, your just stating the obvious then. Same could be said about every share on the market... You'll be pleased to know I understand yes.. Sink or fly though makes no odds to me, I've made my 40+% and moved on for the moment.
blinger
- 03 Jan 2006 19:55
- 13928 of 27111
good lad, I knew I would convince you-lol
Blimey you really HAVE got your rampers head on today,a total of 8 shares, wow.
explosive
- 03 Jan 2006 20:07
- 13929 of 27111
Keep shorting boy, there are plenty like me that have this on watch and will be back in on positive news. Your court case is a joke as realy makes no odds to the potential, if it did you'd have been rambling on about this for months now.
I bet the only reason why you actully watch this thread so eagerly is for a heads up when the buy back begins so you don't get caught!!
blinger
- 03 Jan 2006 20:18
- 13930 of 27111
Nah I watch it for a laugh at the rampers, you know the people who insist that share prices ALWAYS rise, who never sell, take a profit, or do anything but "topped up wiv a foo today, mite", you know the ones, a scream aren`t they?
ps what on earth is a "heads up"?, sounds vaguely gynaecological,
hewittalan6
- 04 Jan 2006 11:04
- 13931 of 27111
Anyone read the BPRG release today?
How do you all read this ref. the upcoming court case?
There is a train of thought that says BPRG have assembled this committee of experts to seek out new markets and new uses for BPRG technology because they perceive themselves as been second to SEO in the marketing and applications.
The other train of thought is that they are positioning themselves to leverage the maximum possible from a court victory that would give them free reign over the field.
Interesting to know what others think about it. The market, generally, doesn't seem impressed.
Alan
Fred1new
- 04 Jan 2006 11:12
- 13932 of 27111
Maybe I am gullible, but the release could also be taken as face value as it would seem sensible approach. The only thing I would like to know is, what are the remunnerations!
hewittalan6
- 04 Jan 2006 11:19
- 13933 of 27111
Agree, Fred. Face value is a possibility. It would just seem a little ill timed to employ several very expensive people to promote, explore and market a technology that is subject to a court case over patent ownership, in the month that case is due to be resolved, unless you were confident of the outcome.
I am a sceptical sort and can't help feeling that the company would have used these advisors on a freelance basis anyway, so why set them up as a panel and then announce it to the stockmarket?
Could it be an SEO no news type release, where the subtext and effect is more important than anything it actually states?
Alan
Sharesure
- 04 Jan 2006 11:28
- 13934 of 27111
Alan, looks like just so much hot air to me. Advisory Boards do not have a great deal of clout in my experience and I doubt that much can be expected of them.
The market in both SEO and BPRG shares seems to think the same. From all conversations I have had with those nearer to the court case they seem to view it as insignificant in both chances of success and impact on SEO, their only proviso being that litigation is usually never straightforward so might spring a surprise. My conclusion is that the risks of adverse impact from the cc are small and probably in the sp already.
hewittalan6
- 04 Jan 2006 11:35
- 13935 of 27111
You're probably right, Sharesure, but its nice to have something to discuss, rather than just hurling insults and dropping in silly forecasts for the future sp. :-)
Alan
rpaco
- 04 Jan 2006 12:51
- 13936 of 27111
Probably the same phenomena that makes a price jump 2 days before it is tipped in Shares mag. It's been said that the price would have gone up anyway due to other factors, but why does it then wait until just before it's tipped in the press. You can see this happen almost every week. If it were at the crack of dawn on publication day or at midnight when shares goes online here it would be undersandable but its always the day before.
Sorry to ramble a bit but the drop yesterday allowed me to top up furthe on SEO.
Hoping the results at the end of the month will justify my faith in the potential. (which as a main substitute for petrochem plastic source material is almost unlimited)
rpaco
- 04 Jan 2006 12:57
- 13937 of 27111
Ahh sorry chaps sound asleep! posted about old item on last page.(which strangely re-occured again today)
Positive Trader
- 04 Jan 2006 23:30
- 13938 of 27111
Happy new year to all.
Have been in this share since 6p and have seen many changes in share price but a lot of positive moves forward from this Company.They have a very good agreement with Asda and Tony Ruane is very happy with the Product and Progress so far, so why so many bad posts to the Companies future. As we have seen so many good movements forward in the past few months.We all have to wait and see what happens but imho I think the future is very bright and that 2006 will see Greenseal with Asda progress and also when the exclusive period comes to an end a lot more Companies will be looking to take on the Technology.And there are all the other products which are coming to the fore in 2006.So stay calm not worried
bhunt1910
- 05 Jan 2006 08:18
- 13939 of 27111
Morning PT.
Is that an opinion - or do you know that Tony is happy with progress so far ??
rpaco
- 05 Jan 2006 15:04
- 13940 of 27111
Still no answer about Starpol development and Lendel MFG inc.
I asked through their investor relations link, but haven't even had a courtesy reply.
Starpol could be so huge it could make everything else totally insignificant.
I have bought all the way through from 6.15p. and 4.2p. Waiting for results at the end of the month.
superrod
- 05 Jan 2006 19:23
- 13941 of 27111
a well known tip sheet has a very long piece on SEO and recommends HOLD.
not good i would say.....:o((