bosley
- 20 Feb 2004 09:34
explosive
- 03 Jan 2006 20:07
- 13929 of 27111
Keep shorting boy, there are plenty like me that have this on watch and will be back in on positive news. Your court case is a joke as realy makes no odds to the potential, if it did you'd have been rambling on about this for months now.
I bet the only reason why you actully watch this thread so eagerly is for a heads up when the buy back begins so you don't get caught!!
blinger
- 03 Jan 2006 20:18
- 13930 of 27111
Nah I watch it for a laugh at the rampers, you know the people who insist that share prices ALWAYS rise, who never sell, take a profit, or do anything but "topped up wiv a foo today, mite", you know the ones, a scream aren`t they?
ps what on earth is a "heads up"?, sounds vaguely gynaecological,
hewittalan6
- 04 Jan 2006 11:04
- 13931 of 27111
Anyone read the BPRG release today?
How do you all read this ref. the upcoming court case?
There is a train of thought that says BPRG have assembled this committee of experts to seek out new markets and new uses for BPRG technology because they perceive themselves as been second to SEO in the marketing and applications.
The other train of thought is that they are positioning themselves to leverage the maximum possible from a court victory that would give them free reign over the field.
Interesting to know what others think about it. The market, generally, doesn't seem impressed.
Alan
Fred1new
- 04 Jan 2006 11:12
- 13932 of 27111
Maybe I am gullible, but the release could also be taken as face value as it would seem sensible approach. The only thing I would like to know is, what are the remunnerations!
hewittalan6
- 04 Jan 2006 11:19
- 13933 of 27111
Agree, Fred. Face value is a possibility. It would just seem a little ill timed to employ several very expensive people to promote, explore and market a technology that is subject to a court case over patent ownership, in the month that case is due to be resolved, unless you were confident of the outcome.
I am a sceptical sort and can't help feeling that the company would have used these advisors on a freelance basis anyway, so why set them up as a panel and then announce it to the stockmarket?
Could it be an SEO no news type release, where the subtext and effect is more important than anything it actually states?
Alan
Sharesure
- 04 Jan 2006 11:28
- 13934 of 27111
Alan, looks like just so much hot air to me. Advisory Boards do not have a great deal of clout in my experience and I doubt that much can be expected of them.
The market in both SEO and BPRG shares seems to think the same. From all conversations I have had with those nearer to the court case they seem to view it as insignificant in both chances of success and impact on SEO, their only proviso being that litigation is usually never straightforward so might spring a surprise. My conclusion is that the risks of adverse impact from the cc are small and probably in the sp already.
hewittalan6
- 04 Jan 2006 11:35
- 13935 of 27111
You're probably right, Sharesure, but its nice to have something to discuss, rather than just hurling insults and dropping in silly forecasts for the future sp. :-)
Alan
rpaco
- 04 Jan 2006 12:51
- 13936 of 27111
Probably the same phenomena that makes a price jump 2 days before it is tipped in Shares mag. It's been said that the price would have gone up anyway due to other factors, but why does it then wait until just before it's tipped in the press. You can see this happen almost every week. If it were at the crack of dawn on publication day or at midnight when shares goes online here it would be undersandable but its always the day before.
Sorry to ramble a bit but the drop yesterday allowed me to top up furthe on SEO.
Hoping the results at the end of the month will justify my faith in the potential. (which as a main substitute for petrochem plastic source material is almost unlimited)
rpaco
- 04 Jan 2006 12:57
- 13937 of 27111
Ahh sorry chaps sound asleep! posted about old item on last page.(which strangely re-occured again today)
Positive Trader
- 04 Jan 2006 23:30
- 13938 of 27111
Happy new year to all.
Have been in this share since 6p and have seen many changes in share price but a lot of positive moves forward from this Company.They have a very good agreement with Asda and Tony Ruane is very happy with the Product and Progress so far, so why so many bad posts to the Companies future. As we have seen so many good movements forward in the past few months.We all have to wait and see what happens but imho I think the future is very bright and that 2006 will see Greenseal with Asda progress and also when the exclusive period comes to an end a lot more Companies will be looking to take on the Technology.And there are all the other products which are coming to the fore in 2006.So stay calm not worried
bhunt1910
- 05 Jan 2006 08:18
- 13939 of 27111
Morning PT.
Is that an opinion - or do you know that Tony is happy with progress so far ??
rpaco
- 05 Jan 2006 15:04
- 13940 of 27111
Still no answer about Starpol development and Lendel MFG inc.
I asked through their investor relations link, but haven't even had a courtesy reply.
Starpol could be so huge it could make everything else totally insignificant.
I have bought all the way through from 6.15p. and 4.2p. Waiting for results at the end of the month.
superrod
- 05 Jan 2006 19:23
- 13941 of 27111
a well known tip sheet has a very long piece on SEO and recommends HOLD.
not good i would say.....:o((
bhunt1910
- 05 Jan 2006 20:01
- 13942 of 27111
Why not Good - with the upcoming court case - I would say that was more of a vote of confidence - or am I missing something ??
If he said sell - then I would have been more concerned short term - but not long term.
Once we get through to July/ August - I suspect/hope this will be a very different company.
blinger
- 05 Jan 2006 20:03
- 13943 of 27111
No word from the `fag-end-tip `auction then,more huff and puff there, no word from the `fill-thee-boots` crowd, all red faces from the `2 by Xmas gurus`, no word from the company, just a steady drop, mind you BPRG are coming back,
lolool!!!!!
Oh and the court case?, ah yes the one SEO will lose, sell and buy some BPRG.
superrod
- 05 Jan 2006 20:11
- 13944 of 27111
bhunt1910
i am not a ramper or deramper wrt this or any other share.....ive made a few bob and would like to make some more out of SEO. my point was merely that the tip sheet in question has recommended buying for many months. they have now "downgraded" to "hold"
One2Watch
- 05 Jan 2006 20:18
- 13945 of 27111
Funny that Superrod....... my copy clearly states BUY.
The final sentence from that long article.........
Overall Stanelco is making exciting progress and if its Greenseal technology
can crack the vast US market, the sky is the limit. BUY
blinger
- 05 Jan 2006 20:22
- 13946 of 27111
Tip sheet dictionary,
`TIPSPEAK` lesson 1---
"BUY"--- get into this share NOW I bought loads last night ready for you slobs
"HOLD"-- christ none of the morons have bought any, lets steady them with "hope"
"ADD"---- COME ON YOU CRETINS I HAVE A SHEDFULL HERE
"SELL"---- Never you honour , my wife just might have had a few, but not I,sell was my expert advice
"TOP UP" Muppet buying from tipsheetsafter losing 99%
"AVERAGING DOWN"-- TO ZERO
"LONG TERM HOLD"---Keep a grip of your sphincter
"Market Maker"--- the swine who holds back muppets profits
"Receiver"---- 5k an hour ---KERCHINKKKK!!!!
sellsell
- 05 Jan 2006 20:36
- 13947 of 27111
very poor superrod. i have seen the buy rec posted by a poster on fyb as well
blinger
- 05 Jan 2006 21:10
- 13948 of 27111
super-odd didn`t say which soothsayer he was quoting, another silly piece of ramping by the gang, trying to portray dishonesty in honest posters
check the mirror rampers!!!!