Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

Dubious sell-off     

ellio - 15 May 2006 09:10

The market seems to be selling-off on the back of limited bad news imo, apart from the dollar that is.

If you can hold your nerve and apart from any short term requirements to offload poor performing stocks, I have a couple!!, my advice would be sit tight. This does not have the feel of the tech(mining!) bubble at all. Difference being there are a lot of good fundamentals, unlike in 2000 when there were a lot of over rated nothing companies.

Toya - 16 Nov 2007 17:56 - 1397 of 1564

That'll be good news for Cynic then - at last the Rock is falling off its 150p ledge for you!

cynic - 16 Nov 2007 18:04 - 1398 of 1564

fell off that some days back ..... 132/133 is current level and slowly drifting south

hlyeo98 - 18 Nov 2007 13:53 - 1399 of 1564

BRITAINs economy could be heading for its worst year for 15 years. They say growth in 2008 could be weaker than at any time since the long upturn began in 1992. After the Bank of England downgraded its growth forecasts last week and warned of further risks, economists say growth next year will be below 2%, threatening a rise in unemployment. The weakest year of growth in the past 15 years was relatively recently, 2005, and saw the economy expand by only 1.8%. The latest compilation of forecasts from Consensus Economics shows that five forecasting groups already have 2008 predictions below that, and others are revising their forecasts.

halifax - 19 Nov 2007 20:53 - 1400 of 1564

If next year is looking so bleak why are the banks going to pay out huge bonuses? If they pay large bonuses then they cannot avoid paying shareholders their share of the profits by way of increased dividends. What is actually going on is bank shares are being shorted massively on the back of the governments totally incompetent mishandling of the NRK debacle.A great deal has been made out of this so called crisis about a small regional bank with only 73 branches and a balance sheet with assets of a mere 100 billion Dont be surprised to see a sudden reversal before long.

Strawbs - 19 Nov 2007 23:04 - 1401 of 1564

The larger banks are probably struggling too. Unlike Northern Rock though they have more options to get emergency funding (instead of going to the bank of England). An article in the Telegraph some time ago noted how activity in the FX market was pointing to possible borrowing in ECB land. LIBOR has jumped again, and I suspect it's only a matter of time before some other banks crawl out of the "credit crisis" woodwork. If not then credit could be tight for years as the banks slowly reduce their exposure.

In my opinion.

Strawbs.

halifax - 19 Nov 2007 23:57 - 1402 of 1564

If you are right then the real banks (not minnows like NRK) should not be paying large bonuses!

Strawbs - 20 Nov 2007 07:20 - 1403 of 1564

If any of them stop paying bonuses it would only start the rumours flying and that would hit the share price. NRK is the only one so far to admit it's struggling and look what happened there. I suspect they'll all struggle on with "business as usual", hoping things will work through the system eventually. It'll just mean tighter lending and lower profits for sometime to come. If markets continue to perform badly then bonuses won't be an issue going forward. It's also possible they don't fully understand there levels of exposure yet. Only yesterday Swiss Re (a re insurer) announced a 1.2 bln sfr loss, having said it would only be 104 mln sfr back in September. I think the picture keeps changing (for the worse so far) each month.

In my opinion....

Strawbs

halifax - 20 Nov 2007 08:14 - 1404 of 1564

To pay massive bonuses and at the same time have to make huge provisions is not good management and shareholders have the right to question the directors actions in this respect. If large bonuses are paid shortly this must confirm that the so called credit crunch has been blown up out of all proportion to the actual problem.

Strawbs - 20 Nov 2007 08:22 - 1405 of 1564

I think it's a case of "damned if you do, damned if you don't". If (it's all hypothetical) they come out and say we're not paying a bonus, the inference will be "money problems" and the share price will tank. If they pay a bonus and nobody finds out they've got a problem, they'll get through it and the share price will hold, even if the sensible option would be to save the money. Ironically it's probably the best option for share holders. Share prices are as much about confidence as fundamentals afterall.

Of course nobody really knows what state the banks are in. The balance of probabilities though, would suggest others are likely to be exposed in some way or another.

In my opinion.

Strawbs

maddoctor - 20 Nov 2007 12:47 - 1406 of 1564

freddie mac!

hlyeo98 - 20 Nov 2007 13:09 - 1407 of 1564

It is just like the almost bankrupt businessman trying to show off to his clients by buying a new Ferrari and a Rolex gold watch. Then things go BUST.

maddoctor - 20 Nov 2007 14:04 - 1408 of 1564

NEW YORK (MarketWatch) -- Mortgage investor Freddie Mac said its third-quarter loss more than doubled from year-ago levels as mortgage prices collapsed and credit tightened, forcing the firm to add to loss provisions and consider cutting its dividend in half. See full story.
Horton has fourth-quarter loss; market 'remains challenging'
Homebuilder D.R. Horton Inc. swung to a net loss in its fiscal fourth quarter as the company took more land-related write-downs amid the continuing downturn in the housing market. The company also expects the housing environment to "remain challenging."
Analysts worry that mortgage woes could spread to auto loans
Rising delinquency rates on car and truck loans have some industry analysts concerned that subprime mortgage troubles could spill into the automotive finance business.

BigTed - 22 Nov 2007 08:10 - 1409 of 1564

Kesa Electricals has this morning reported sustained strong sales momentum in its third quarter.

Europe's third-biggest electricals retailer said this reflected continuing strong demand for multimedia goods and flat-screen TVs.

For the three months to October 31st, the group's total sales increased by 11.3% and were up 9.9% in local currency.

Like-for-like sales were up 3%, slightly below analysts' expectations.

'This was a solid third quarter performance. Against the high comparatives of last year, all our businesses delivered revenue growth,' said CEO, Jean-Noel Labroue.

The CEO said that despite continued strong demand for flat-screen televisions and good sales of multimedia equipment, particularly laptops, the negative mix effect on the margin observed at the end of the first half continued throughout this quarter.



just posted this as a reminder that people are still spending, and i bet sales in general will be very strong this Christmas on the high street. My prediction 3 months ago of a rate drop before Christmas could still ring true yet...

Big Al - 22 Nov 2007 08:34 - 1410 of 1564

halifax - not sure about the reasoning re bonuses above. We've seen the heads of 2 of the largest banks in the world (US) resign and take monster payouts for building up massive debts which were written down. To add to that, we've known about fat cats for decades. Personally, the bigger the bonuses, the more these banks are worrying that they must grab it now IMO!!! ;-)))

halifax - 22 Nov 2007 09:46 - 1411 of 1564

Big Al thats fine if the bonuses are justifiable but if the shareholders dont see a relative increase in dividend or increased share buybacks then the directors will be on the line for not looking after the shareholders interests.

partridge - 22 Nov 2007 09:54 - 1412 of 1564

Seems to me that banking bonuses are calculated against profits and profits are to a large extent calculated against alleged value of derivative type products and the like held on the books. It is therefore in their interests to value these as highly as possible and we all now know that some of these historically were well away from reality. In my view any bonuses should be calculated primarily against cash profits.

Big Al - 22 Nov 2007 10:09 - 1413 of 1564

halifax - compeltely agree with you. Just saying that these incompetents milk it for all its worth even when things have plainly gone t*ts up.

It seems to me they continue even when they know they'll be hauled over the coals. There's no penalty for a director who cocks up and never has been IMO.

halifax - 22 Nov 2007 10:16 - 1414 of 1564

Partridge agree bonuses should not paid out on unbooked profits. This is why it is also the responsibility of external auditors to ensure that stated profits are tangible otherwise they too can be held to account by the shareholders.

BigTed - 22 Nov 2007 10:21 - 1415 of 1564

Will there be one big sell off before a bounce...??? will we test 5850 this week or next??? tough call, but sentiment is negative everywhere i turn...

pericles - 22 Nov 2007 10:39 - 1416 of 1564

Bonuses of top execs shd rise with shareholders divs,and fall too if appropriate ,its the shareholders who are the owners and they have all to lose. If any one still feels cheerful trythis piece from a top bear writing on systemic financial meltdown on FT Alphaville http://ftalphaville.ft.com/blog/2007/11/21/9066/stand-by-for-generalised-systemic-financial-meltdown/
Register now or login to post to this thread.