superrod
- 11 Jun 2003 19:26
doesnt leave much does it? but lets try and kick start this site into action. posts are very few and far between. why is that? talk about anything but TALK. its free but it wont last without input......so PUT IN a post or two here and there.
and this time next year we will all be MILLIONAIRES
superrod
- 15 Jun 2003 20:52
- 14 of 61
Andy
i have had the odd dabble on rgu but something smells bad there.
i hope oldolie is not trying to spoil a genuine effort at dialogue
superrod
- 15 Jun 2003 20:56
- 15 of 61
ps
is my pc/link/browser/etc playiny up? only 3 posts all weekend :o((
and thats the whole bb
Cassis
- 15 Jun 2003 21:08
- 16 of 61
( It's called banning everyone who has something to say super-odd....it tends to have this effect..)
Andy
- 16 Jun 2003 00:46
- 17 of 61
Rod,
I guess the "protaganists" are still here, but minding their P's and Q's!
Yes it's difficult to build up the BB when it's so quiet, as people no doubt log in, see nothing interesting, and move onto another BB.
I actually belong to all the major BB's, as do an increasing number of fellow posters! It seems there is so little interest in the current market that people are desperately searching all the BB's for news/info etc.
Hopefully we can build this BB up in time.
superrod
- 17 Jun 2003 21:43
- 18 of 61
what a DREARY day
is this site ever hoping to make any money?
Tris
- 18 Jun 2003 06:14
- 19 of 61
Hi Rod, just popped back here to check for info on one of our favourites :0)nothing doing Im afraid. We could start a new thread on our joint venture, but with oily and his/her mates still here whats the point!!! Lifes too short to put up with the abuse etcwhy bother??
As Andy says desperately searching all the BB's for news/info etc. sadly this BB was damaged by they who know best whats to say it wouldnt happen again!!! As I said lifes too short or as Spikes army pal (Private Mulgrew) always said, Fem. Very funny book btw
Tris
Sequestor
- 18 Jun 2003 08:35
- 20 of 61
The same old bollox" just popped in to check on the quality of posts since I left" Miss Tris-hoovered
Squelched Users
User Remove
superrod
Cassis
Tris
sober
All ainsoph clones
superrod
- 19 Jun 2003 21:20
- 21 of 61
too true tris
i really cannot believe some of the crap i read on financial sites. i would say that 90% of posters have never held a share in their lives.
hows it going olie?
ccl? lol
etq lol
cs. :o)))))
amt :o)))))
tsco:o)))))
Sequestor
- 20 Jun 2003 17:29
- 22 of 61
super-odd - 19 Jun'03 - 21:20 - 20 of 20 (Failed)
macCavity
- 20 Jun 2003 19:44
- 23 of 61
Superrod,
I applaude your attempt to engender discussion but quite frankly it seems to me that people are leaving mam in droves for some reason. I logged in earlier today and the last threads I looked at are only a 1/4 down the page with no posts whatsoever!
I think mam have been overzealous in their censorship and the bb might, I fear, be in a terminal decline. Hope not because I initially thought it had some potential. Nonsense posts from people like sequestor are permitted because he has subscribed, and the guy takes great pleasure goading everyone who disagrees with him and then hiding behind his shield. This pisses people off. Money AM need to be balanced regardless of who has subscribed, perhaps then chaps would take the bb seriously and return. You know how the British feel about fair play! We even go to war over it.
Still good luck with your thread.
Andy
- 20 Jun 2003 22:07
- 24 of 61
macCavit,
I fear you are right, but for the opposite reason.
Ainsoph was posting here when the site opened, and there wasn't a problem.
Then certain people arrived, and started the baiting slowly, posting little "test" messages on Ainsoph threads.
Then the real action started, and at that point AM should have stepped in and banned them, IMHO.
They didn't and watched a personal battle rage, and nearly all the threads were trashed, but still nothing was done.
Finally, as the exodus from the BB increased, (and the combatants were copying posts between Am and ADVFN!), they finally stepped in, much too late, IMHO.
Sadly those that have left have yet to return, and AM has lost the chance to become the premier finacial BB, for now at least.
Andy.
Sequestor
- 21 Jun 2003 18:42
- 25 of 61
macCavity - 20 Jun'03 - 19:44 - 22 of 23
evening Keith
Sequestor
- 21 Jun 2003 18:46
- 26 of 61
and AM has lost the chance to become the premier finacial BB, for now at least.
-----------------------------
UNBIEVABLE, a semi-legal ramping gang are banned and we are expected to believe that this has caused the death of MONEYAM- where do these people live,
Siberia
dear oh dear.
Andy
- 21 Jun 2003 19:00
- 27 of 61
Sequestor,
I presume you are Oldolie, Shagnasty, raving davy Gravy et al?
I actually never held any of the shares that Ainsoph posted on, not my area of interest, so although I read some of the threads, I never felt tempted to invest. Just becuase someone posts bullish or bearish posts about a company does not compel anyone reading to buy, although obviously it may arouse their interest in that particular company.
We are all adults here, and responssible for own investment decisions, so if someone is silly enough to invest on the strength of a BB comment alose, then that would be plain daft!
And if you're looking for "nearly legal ramping gangs" there are one or two threads On ADVFN that you may care to look at, take the last 300 posts on the MMD thread for example!
And you fail to mention the "ramping gangs" that employ the use of multiple logons on ADVFN, of which there are at least two that I can identify, but have obviously escaped your notice.
Andy.
Nobody else had
superrod
- 21 Jun 2003 20:13
- 28 of 61
macCavity
thanks for your input, if a few more like you posted we might have a fighting chance of making a decent forum here.
Andy
sequestor IS oldolie and he gets away with the crap he posts because he PAYS for the privelege. sad but thats the way the world turns.
doesnt mean we have to put up with it though. SQUELCH!!!!!!!
works wonders
Sequestor
- 23 Jun 2003 22:04
- 29 of 61
Andy you assume wrongly about my aliases, but there again that is none of your business anyway, so I shall ignore the comment.
It was MAM who decided to ban those whom they did, not the posters who were critical of there attitude, I doubt if you or I will find out the real reason for the bans, they are obviously more serious than a few ill-chosen words by them.
I was commenting on your statement that "Sadly those that have left have yet to return, and AM has lost the chance to become the premier finacial BB, for now at least",
which is muddled, "they" are not being allowed to return it is not an issue of `when`, but never; will this prevent MAM from becoming a ` premier financial service`, doubt it.
ps for someone who has no interest in `the great departed one`and the subject is not ` in your sphere of interest, you are remarkably cognisant of his work and teachings, also of those who dared to contradict him; I have to bow to your superior knowlege on this occasion, personally the image of St. Ainsoph,seated to the right hand of Beelzebub, is enough schadenfreude for me to handle,I commend the image to you.
natzok
- 23 Jun 2003 22:18
- 30 of 61
l like a gamble like you all,but instead of bickering why not use the threads on this site to benefit everyone.heres my first bet,coke cola to rise10%by sept
30th.
Andy
- 24 Jun 2003 01:08
- 31 of 61
Sequestor,
My comment "those who have left have yet to return" actually refers to those other posters, people that were not involved in the battle, who simply left this BB, and have not returned. I agree that I did not word that well, as I meant other posters that have left the BB.
I can honestly say I do not know Ainsoph, but I have been on ADVFN for years, and as soon as I saw certain logons appearing here, I knew what was going to happen, and I wasn't wrong!
Just to clarify, I have NEVER held or traded TAD, or BT, in any shape or form!
I hold mainly resource / mining shares, which clearly aren't Ainsoph's field at all.
I have no "superior knowledge", just a desire to see this BB become sucessful, and that will only be IF they introduce a proper registration policy, (though I doubt they ever will). I would have thought they would have benefitted from ADVFN's mistakes, but alas not!
regards,
Andy.
Sequestor
- 24 Jun 2003 09:16
- 32 of 61
ANDY
Tell me about mining shares , AVM, and PRE are the only ones I hold now, for my sins, altho` I did make a few bob on Palladium (the base metal not the co.) when it surged a couple of years back, ironic as a lump of my earlier career was in the industry.
good luck
superrod
- 24 Jun 2003 20:24
- 33 of 61
this site is getting more dire by the day. apart from olie ( squelched ) there are virtually no posts anywhere :o((