Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

stanelco .......a new thread (SEO)     

bosley - 20 Feb 2004 09:34

Chart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Code=SEO&SiChart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Code=SEO&Si

for more information about stanelco click on the links.

driver's research page link
http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/posts.php?tid=7681#lastread
website link
http://www.stanelco.co.uk/index.htm


blinger - 16 Jan 2006 16:30 - 14159 of 27111

Another day in court tomorrow, watch out for 10.30 am

bhunt1910 - 16 Jan 2006 16:34 - 14160 of 27111

Now was that a 1m buy or a delayed 1m sell ??

nicksig - 16 Jan 2006 16:34 - 14161 of 27111

1m trade in at 16.30. Marked as buy. Do you think this is right? If so, what confidence...

nicksig - 16 Jan 2006 16:35 - 14162 of 27111

And accompanied by a 1,750,000 trade at same price marked on my system as a sell. Any thoughts?

hewittalan6 - 16 Jan 2006 16:48 - 14163 of 27111

Both trades are marked as O trades so they shouldn't be delayed in reporting at all.
The 1.75 million was part of the auction, so God alone knows what that might be.
Tomorrow morning might tell us, if the price opens up or down.
No doubt the enlightened SEO shafters who encourage us to short will have their explanation for these trades as some kind of devious plot by the other shorters to make even more money from us.
I give up.
Alan

greekman - 16 Jan 2006 16:53 - 14164 of 27111

There can be no doubt that there are several persons at least who have followed this case within the court today.
With the large buys of SEO that have come through and a closing price of .25p up. ( BPRG negative volume and a closing price of .25p down ) this presumably means that the result at the present level of proceedings looks like an outcome that may benefit SEO without having a serious effect on BPRG. As has been said many times, when this CC is over both companies can concentrate on the future. The next few days will tell.

No doubt from now till next am, there will be several persons who will state they have been in court today and that SEO/BPRG are the outright winners.
The truth is no one knows.

jimward9 - 16 Jan 2006 17:40 - 14165 of 27111

alan
other sells were lower than 16p just before.
TDWaterhouse, has them both as buys.

blinger - 16 Jan 2006 17:58 - 14166 of 27111

they were 2.7m delayed sells, tin hats on tomorrow.

bhunt1910 - 16 Jan 2006 18:03 - 14167 of 27111

courtreporter - 16 Jan'06 - 17:57 - 57240 of 57240
copied from elsewhere


Court 74 11 until 4

Talks all weekend to reach settlement

Started with further talks in seperate room

No agreement reached

Stanelco appealing patent ownership, breach and prior art evidence application

Mlller went first dealing in the above order in his hesitating style

Discussion around capsule definition, unlikely to include sachets, based upon how formed

Core inventive concept challenged on grounds of how rather than idea of

Judges advocate settlement, mention of several years of litigation

Miller continues Tue

Impossible to call it at this stage

Will post on both threads to assist debate

I hope we settle with Stanelco to avoid this dragging on and on as it is more important to us than it is them in terms of core business.

blinger - 16 Jan 2006 18:07 - 14168 of 27111

How many aliases do these rampers? have this is dreadful!+pond 1/cherryb etc.etc.

Posted: 16-Jan-06 at 17:06 | IP Logged
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

There can be no doubt that there are several persons at least who have followed this case within the court today.
With the large buys of SEO that have come through and a closing price of .25p up. ( BPRG negative volume and a closing price of .25p down ) this presumably means that the result at the present level of proceedings looks like an outcome that may benefit SEO without having a serious effect on BPRG. As has been said many times, when this CC is over both companies can concentrate on the future. The next few days will tell.


__________________
Greekman

nicksig - 16 Jan 2006 18:41 - 14169 of 27111

Blinger: As far as I can see it is impossible to tell whether the final trades are buys or sells. If they were reported an hour late the change in the sp at 16.07 makes no sense - it would have come earlier and would have been a more dramatic shift. To say they are both delayed sells is reckless and without ground. If you want to influence the sp negatively to go short you'll have to try hard than that.

blinger - 16 Jan 2006 18:46 - 14170 of 27111

so they are not both sells then?-if not what do you see them as? - no surprises as we wait for the reply then- long are we?

my opinion is sells, hardly reckless to have an opinion?

The deals could well have been done earlier and if they were then on the "touch" price at the time, they are merely reported as an O trade.

nicksig - 16 Jan 2006 19:10 - 14171 of 27111

It's reckless to try and panic traders that don't know better - which is what you continually try to do on this board. My point is that these trades cannot be identified as either buys or sells. If they had come earlier in the day, they could still be buys. Either way, there was support for the sp today...and as you rightly say tomorrow things will be clearer.

nicksig - 16 Jan 2006 19:10 - 14172 of 27111

It's reckless to try and panic traders that don't know better - which is what you continually try to do on this board. My point is that these trades cannot be identified as either buys or sells. If they had come earlier in the day, they could still be buys. Either way, there was support for the sp today...and as you rightly say tomorrow things will be clearer.

jj50 - 16 Jan 2006 19:19 - 14173 of 27111

MAM lists trades for today as total 4.474,972 buys and 1,950,127 sells with orders of 1 and 1.75 million to buy going through at closing time.

blinger - 16 Jan 2006 19:33 - 14174 of 27111

mam is wrong, they merely guess the closest to the touch price.

garyble - 16 Jan 2006 19:37 - 14175 of 27111

BOS,

SEO continues to amaze! Hard to predict and so much potential!

Can't wait to see if another one of your amazing predictions is spot on for tomorrow.

garyble - 16 Jan 2006 19:45 - 14176 of 27111

& BOS's guess is better!

blinger - 16 Jan 2006 20:28 - 14177 of 27111

the first rule is never listen to rampers. the second rule is don`t forget the first rule,
the third rule is dump SEO as soon as poss.

lolol!!!!!!!!

garyble - 16 Jan 2006 20:37 - 14178 of 27111

BOS,

There's a guy on another bb who sees the "MEN IN DARK GLASSES", I take it you'll be seeing the "MEN IN WHITE COATS" by the end of the week!!
Register now or login to post to this thread.