for more information about stanelco click on the links.

driver's research page link
http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/posts.php?tid=7681#lastread
website link
http://www.stanelco.co.uk/index.htm

ps if the court report IS phony, that is extremely bad.

But Bling - it is not - go check for yourself

COURT 74
Before LORD JUSTICE WARD
LORD JUSTICE JACOB and
LORD JUSTICE WILSON
Tuesday, 17th January, 2006
At half-past 10
APPEALS
From The Chancery Division
Patents Court
FINAL DECISIONS
A3/2005/0824 Stanelco RF Technologies Ltd v Bioprogress Technology Ltd. Appeal of Claimant from the order of Mr Christopher Floyd QC, dated 9th December 2004, filed 15th April 2005. Part Heard.
A3/2005/0823 Stanelco RF Technologies Ltd v Bioprogress Technology Ltd. Appeal of Claimant from the order of Mr Christopher Floyd QC, dated 2nd November 2004, filed 15th April 2005. Part Heard.
A3/2005/0819 Stanelco RF Technologies Ltd v Bioprogress Technology Ltd. Appeal of Defendant from the order of Mr Christopher Floyd QC, dated 2nd November 2004, filed 15th April 2005. Part Heard.


Not sure if this has been posted but here it is anyway

It is phoney, it was hived from another site and edited to suit the posters needs.

Oh Shamona - go look for yourself - or post what you think is the correct version - no matter - the gist was pretty accurate

i don't understand why they can't reach an ooc settlement. makes a lot more sense than paying lawyers.

Remarkably quiet on here considering the sudden drop. Hope its only a tree shake with MM's looking for stock - but not sure how that works with a Sets stock - if it works at all.

Not sure even if it really exists!!!!

Chin up lads, win or lose, once its out of the way, the only way is up. For SEO & BPRG.

Jim - 100% agree with you - though I suspect agreement is still some 6 months down the line. Not sure that they will agree anything this week and as SEO are bound in my opinion to pick up some damages and of course costs - it is in their interest to delay things until they have more revenue coming through the door - so thgat it will not hurt as much.

bhunt, er yes I can read the High Court page too, unfortunately it doesn`t say what happened yesterday, where is the official version of the minutes you imply are extant?

Oh and take a look at the share price and volume to see the opinion of holders.

Same old story, different government.
This is why SEO may have huge potential.
This has just been released.

Packaging waste has gone up by more than a million tonnes in the past seven years.

Defra Minister Lord Bach told a conference more needs to be done to ensure the UK meets 2008 packaging targets.

But he said he recognised progress had already been achieved by firms and local authorities in improving recycling rates for packaging.

He said: "The efforts everyone has made in terms of recycling packaging waste have already resulted in considerable progress and thanks to this we are now recycling almost 50% of our packaging waste - double that in 1997.

"But there needs to be a greater focus on minimisation and that focus must start today. Packaging waste has increased by over a million tonnes in the past seven years and this cannot continue."

Lord Bach, who highlighted new regulations setting revised recovery and recycling targets for packaging waste, also encouraged firms to engage more with local councils, the waste industry and consumers.

"Consumers rightly have an important role to play, by choosing goods that are not heavily packaged, buying 'loose' food rather than pre-packaged food, or using their own shopping bags or boxes.

"However, more needs to be done by industry to offer the public this choice and demonstrate to them where you have already made progress in terms of reducing the size and weight of certain packaging.

"These new regulations will certainly present some challenges but by working together, from Government right down through business and on to consumers, I am confident we can meet them."

Lord Bach also launched a Defra booklet summarising the changes which can be found at www.defra.gov.uk.

Ah yes free beer tomorrow-lol.

This thing is rangebound as Captain Biggles well knows in his ramps,e.g. it reaches its lower level in the range -" hold tight for take off", its reaches its range top "accelerating to 30k feet", nothing happens ?- flight delay.
Never seen such BS since Gordon Brown

When I look at todays 'volume' it tells me that the vast majority of shareholders are not selling! Some folks do make silly comments!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Bling - dont try playing clever.

I dont know if there is an official version of the court proceedings - probably not.

All that I said was that I had copied from another thread their account of the proceedings. This was in the main substantiated by others who were also there.

I thought it was a reasonable summary of what went on because none of the others that were there denounced it. If you would care to put up your version of events - then thats fine - I dont have a problem with that - but to denounce something you have no knowledge of - well - that speaks for itself.

Be fair Baza. Blings a member of the aristocracy. If you restrict him to posting only about things he has knowledge about the thread will fill up with posts about inbreeding and corgis.

Alan - thats True - did not think of that.

Apologies Bling - you carry on mate - but remember whatever you post - I will probably do the opposite.

PS just bought some seo at 15

Baza

i am beginnig to like this stock will be buying anther 100000.

lol Tanker. A clear sell signal then.

bhunt- if looking for the truth is "trying to be clever" (pretty juvenile cliche), I stand guilty, repeating unsubstantiated drivel is as bad as making it up- unless of course the post is substantiated.Then I shall owe the original poster an apology, not you whowever ,who merely repeated a piece of dogma which suited your ramping.

Hewitalan , you are a sad case- look at the share price dearie!!!!

As for the rest of the rampers` rubbish posted tonight- geddoutahere!!!!!!

DOWN AGAIN!!!!!!!