Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

Tadpole Evolves (TAD)     

ainsoph - 23 May 2003 13:32

A new thread that may swim in hibernation for a few days or weeks as the process of evolution takes place ......

Imagine a slimmed down debt free company with one division stacked with orders and self financing with cash in the bank.

Then imagine a partner for the other division with pockets so deep that they could fund a rocket to the moon ..... and back

Dreaming of course but Tads can do that to you ..... what a gem or is that a bygone dream as well .....


ainsoph


We started the day at 4.75p mid - risk grade 583 - currently 6p - spamming posts 63 out of 140

superrod - 26 May 2003 18:45 - 143 of 729

gravy
i see you are still banging on about aliases

get real.............its all in your imagination.

ps


MY MILLION QUID IS STILL YOURS IF YOU CAN PROVE YOUR CLAIM THAT GOLD COAST AND AINSOPH ARE ONE AND THE SAME.
all you need to do is put up a lousy fiver. pretty good odds id have thought.
easiest fiver ive ever made

Bullshare - 26 May 2003 20:31 - 144 of 729

Well we gave lots of warning shots last week, and despite me taking the trouble to spell things out in black and white some people are either too stupid or juvenile to understand. So bye bye quite a few names some will not be a surprise others might be.

Our tolerance levels have been quite high but with so many complaints over the weekend we are no longer able to distinguish between investment chatter and rubbish on this thread.

Mike

superrod - 26 May 2003 22:13 - 145 of 729

mike
i am still waiting to see if my input to this thread has got me a ban. however, all i want to do is talk to like minded peeps. i am sick and tired of the stalkers. i hope to wake up minus a few posters and a blue screen :o))



ps
where did the duplicate thread go?

advfn4ever - 26 May 2003 22:15 - 146 of 729

Bully,

stop wiping me off..it hurts.

Neo (with a broken heart)

Bullshare - 26 May 2003 22:17 - 147 of 729

superod. No you are not. But you will tell already who they were.

Duplicate thread went as it contained Zero apart from a copy of this.

Had to take a hard line across both sides I am afraid.

We can't win on this one, but have decided enough is enough.

advfn4ever - 26 May 2003 22:21 - 148 of 729

Thanks bully, promise we will both be good in future!

Bullshare - 26 May 2003 22:22 - 149 of 729

Neo; don't hold your breath,I am not

superrod - 26 May 2003 22:23 - 150 of 729

thanks mike

im a nice guy after all who just wants to get on and get STINKING RICH. LOL



ps its supeRROd

dickdasterdly10000 - 27 May 2003 08:04 - 151 of 729

Morning

Mr Bullshare - care to confirm who you have got rid of for reference?

Densil - 27 May 2003 08:05 - 152 of 729

A very positive looking chart combination this morning.
A very positive start to the trading too.

Bullshare - 27 May 2003 08:08 - 153 of 729

Dick:I am happy (actually not happy)to confirm that so far Censor(NE0), Bunnyboiler and Ainsoph have been removed. Others may well follow.

All:There are no winners in this so let's not have any of the 'well he got banned' nonsense. The fact is we,MoneyAM, are bored rigid by the abuse. In future we will not be very tolerant.

dickdasterdly10000 - 27 May 2003 08:09 - 154 of 729

Fair enough

Not Sure I agree will all of those but have a good day anyway

iago - 27 May 2003 08:27 - 155 of 729

Bullshare

What a shame you didnt just edit the abuse as it arrived, this way, after a few days the lunatic fringe would get the message and go vent their bile elsewhere.

Methinks you have thrown the baby out with the bath water here, and have possibly now killed this thread.

all IMHO---IAGO

dickdasterdly10000 - 27 May 2003 08:31 - 156 of 729

iago

I have to agree

rjs - 27 May 2003 08:32 - 157 of 729

this is typical.

moneyam have done the right thing all round. I popped in over the w/e to have a look. See if there was any news etc...of course there wasnt!! and the thread was totally unreadbale due to "both sides" actions.

Today we are up 20% and climbing and the discussion is on the rights and wrongs of these bannings.

Like Bullshare says, they made plenty of warnings and if "they" didnt take heed, then unlucky.

>iago - death of the thread??? its the start of it IMO.

dickdasterdly10000 - 27 May 2003 08:33 - 158 of 729

rico

will you sell now please as you can get more than you wanted?

Beau62 - 27 May 2003 08:33 - 159 of 729

Can only agree rjs.

rjs - 27 May 2003 08:36 - 160 of 729

>dd, not just yet..its getting exciting ;-) there must be some news around the corner.

Densil - 27 May 2003 08:36 - 161 of 729

I think they had to do something since it was getting silly.
I think Ainsoph, a great poster, just couldn't leave it to the monitors to deal with and insisted on responding himself.
As for the spammers, nobody's going to miss them.
I thing they'll all be back soon enough.
If Bullshare set up a filter and zapped out the personal posts or even just the abusive ones, we'd probably get along just fine.

Nice to see TAD breaking out this morning despite all the petty squabbles and, if anything delivers the coume-uppance to the spammers, itll be this.

dickdasterdly10000 - 27 May 2003 08:40 - 162 of 729

have to say i don't agree but oh well

price down a tick

due to real selling/profit taking or just a ploy?

time will tell
Register now or login to post to this thread.