bosley
- 20 Feb 2004 09:34
explosive
- 24 Jan 2006 18:59
- 14327 of 27111
Is that another 5er you made then bling, sp doesn't look like its gonna crash and burn yet?.... Having said that nothing going for it either to escape the 14p hold...
hewittalan6
- 24 Jan 2006 19:16
- 14328 of 27111
Anyone who fancies a good giggle this evening ought to look back at this thread around about the begining of December.
The SP was <13p and anyone long was an uneducated tit. The shorters were having a field day insisting 10p by Xmas and how they were going to trouser it big time.
The Sp has never been that low since, but I have not noticed any of those posters back saying they got it wrong. Quite the reverse. Judging by explosives post, they claim to be getting it right constantly!!
Just to prove, self confessed geniuses who short this as a dog can be wrong, just like the rest of us mere mortals.
Biscuit
- 24 Jan 2006 19:22
- 14329 of 27111
Alan, You will probably never find a "trader" who will ever admit to being wrong, in fact, most like to call themselves "investors" which is very funny, however, the majority of them must be wrong, most of the time as it's just glorified gambling really. You can gaurantee their brokers will probably be quite wealthy by they've finished though. Strange how most "traders" seem to think they can influence share prices through posting on an internet BB! Why do you think poker sites advertise so much on here, traders love a good gamble!
explosive
- 24 Jan 2006 19:29
- 14330 of 27111
Alan - I sold my SEO holding on the 19/12/05.... Not a shorter though, sold with the forthcoming court case which on resolution I thought would push the price back to 12. You are correct though if I'd have held and sold today I would have got a slightly better price for my shares.. All my trades are long plays and been in SEO since the 5p days when RHPS advised sell. No shorter here and will hold SEO again on first wind of movement..
blinger
- 24 Jan 2006 20:07
- 14331 of 27111
I am often wrong!!!, any investor of whichever persuation, who claims not to be is a ramping moron, the secret is NOT to be wrong too long -, its very simple guys ---
Einstein said "Those who understand compound interest are destined to collect it.
Those who don't are doomed to pay it."
It works in reverse, guys, any gains while short are compounded too- if reinvested!.
But I presume you knew that- a gain, is a gain, is a gain, no matter from where it was gleened- althoughhhhhhh- upon reflection -- no you probably don`t.
blinger
- 24 Jan 2006 20:16
- 14332 of 27111
er hewitalan, you boast of the share price being<13p beginning of Dec., it rose a lot in the first week up to 17p sooo--
1.Did you buy some at <13p, if so you have a small paper profit
2.Did you buy some a couple of days into Dec. @ 17p? if so you are losing-on paper
3.Are you a long term holder- if so why all the regular posts after each tiny movement up!!
4.Do you trade them, if not why post so often
5.Are you ramping them- if not see last (4)
6.When it was <13p what did you post it would be by now
Over!!!tell us where you stand -good lad
blinger
- 24 Jan 2006 20:39
- 14333 of 27111
Explosive-I am sure you are a nice decent person and determined not to be classified with the dreaded epithet "I am a shorter", but , how can I put this?? , do you REALLY understand investment, I mean shouldn`t you go on a course??
Let me explain, the definition of your no.1 enemy " A SHORTER", is basically
` a person who sells a share hoping to buy it back more cheaply later`.
OK so far, now you may retaliate with a comment about " shorters do not own the share"- sorry legally they do, even if they borrow it,
Now read this---
---
"explosive - 24 Jan 2006 19:29 - 14330 of 14332
Alan - I sold my SEO holding on the 19/12/05.... Not a shorter though, sold with the forthcoming court case which on resolution I thought would push the price back to 12. You are correct though if I'd have held and sold today I would have got a slightly better price for my shares.. All my trades are long plays and been in SEO since the 5p days when RHPS advised sell. No shorter here and will hold SEO again on first wind of movement..
--
UNDERSTAND NOW"!!
You sold- around 15p I suggest--- hoping to buy back more cheaply later---@12p---- you dirty filthy shorting swine-we all love you dearly.
YOU SOLD SHORT DUMMY!!!!!!!!!!
lolololol!!!!!!!
hlyeo98
- 25 Jan 2006 09:15
- 14334 of 27111
Is there any news on the court case???
hewittalan6
- 25 Jan 2006 09:19
- 14335 of 27111
If there was it would probably only be that the legal teams from both sides have asked for an adjournment while they go on world cruises and buy carribean islands on the proceeds!!
No one will be a winner. Both will lose out in the end because that is the nature of these things.
But even that will not be for some time yet, I don't think, unless someone starts banging heads together.
All IMHO of course, but chill out on the cc.
explosive
- 25 Jan 2006 23:24
- 14336 of 27111
Bling - post 14333, truly a classic, I may add however just for giggle that no I don't fully understand investment, if I did I wouldn't be posting here.... Yes I could go on a course but then I run the risk of meeting the kinds found only at investment courses or timeshare presentations!!
OK, tar and feather me, yes my play in SEO is currently short. I call it protecting or maximising my profits, come April I expect to be back in and fingers crossed watching the paper money come rolling in once again!....
To conclude shorters are not my enemy. I if being truthfull admire those who make up their own minds rather than following like sheep others on BBs who are happy enough to sit on an equity in the hope of good news and profit.
jammyjimmy
- 26 Jan 2006 06:52
- 14337 of 27111
Blinger,
Post 14331.
You are certainly no Einstein ......quite the opposite, it would seem.
It is 'persuasion' not 'persuation' and 'gleaned' not 'gleened'.
Just maybe you should spend a little less time being offensive to people and devote a little more time to improving your calamitous spelling.
Just a friendly suggestion from one smart-arse to another you understand.......
blinger
- 26 Jan 2006 11:21
- 14338 of 27111
lol @ "the spelling B"
- jammy jimmy-I have told you my secretary is a Serbo-Croat, lovely looking girl though, has her spelling hurt the share price ?-eggselentt!!!!
No you aren`t a smart arse , just a bore, so I herby squelch you-begone, can`t abide `mind-messers`
-----.
Exy`-have to agree with you about corporate meeting places- dreadful, or as my secretary would say `dridfools`, nice to see you take advantage of the market, it`s the only way to make money
ps short VOG, a load more BS from an RNS.
johnny the fox
- 26 Jan 2006 11:47
- 14339 of 27111
What's happened to the cc? We seem to have gone from an RNS every time the chairman visited the mens room to nothing. Or has the cc become of no significance?
garyble
- 26 Jan 2006 12:22
- 14340 of 27111
BOS, can you guess the course I'd recommend you go on?
JJS
- 26 Jan 2006 12:23
- 14341 of 27111
Johhny,
The CC is of negligable interest in comparison to the very big deals heading to Stanelco from the USA within the next few weeks
johnny the fox
- 26 Jan 2006 12:51
- 14342 of 27111
JJS
Lets hope so. Seo has far more positive than negative points in its favour. If figures for '05 are somewhere near forecasts it should be indicative of where seo is headed. We shall see.
Biscuit
- 26 Jan 2006 13:37
- 14343 of 27111
JJS,
Are you expecting more than 1 over then next few weeks?
jammyjimmy
- 26 Jan 2006 15:07
- 14344 of 27111
Blinger
Surely you mean 'secretory', which means secretion-forming Blinger, as I am sure that will be about as close to having a real secretary as you will ever get. Try as you may to convince me otherwise, I am sure it is just little-old-you, sitting day-after-day in a darkened room somewhere, churning out your anti SEO drivel by slamming your extended forehead into a drool covered keyboard. BTW SEO holding firm today. LOL
blinger
- 26 Jan 2006 15:12
- 14345 of 27111
gumboil here is a course for you to follow--Foxtrot Oscar
Where has post 14344 gone?, oh yes disappeared as that `jamjar jimmy`is squelsheded, what a prat.
Level2 is looking bad lads, time for a big fall soon.
jammyjimmy
- 26 Jan 2006 15:48
- 14346 of 27111
Blinger
I thought I was 'squelched', (not squelsheded), previously?.....just another untruth, I suppose. Anyway Blinger, you have excelled yourself....in a post containing 38 words, there are a minimum of 6 grammatical and spelling errors. You don't work for the Guardian do you? 'Squelch' away now son. BTW, SEO is still holding up well, (no crash and burn), time for some good news and a bit of a tick-up maybe. TTFN