hyleo quiet today.........oh yes, thats cos lloy is up today so far.....what a pathetic prat he is

BROKERS Recomendations

UBS: reiterated buy for LLOY

Hey Master.

I for one think you are a funny man who makes me laugh with your cartoons.

I've made plenty of money on your short-term analysis so keep up the good work!

same here........i make more from master than that idiot hyleo.

Proving to be a day of indecision so far, thought the DOW futures is a bit higher

Indecisions >>>>>>>>>

PS - for those following PHTM, is up another 8.70% today

Oriel gives 1.09 as fair value

Nothing much is going on as the DOW open lower by 33 points after expecting a rise of 24 at opening, but General Motors warning made the change.

Expected the shares at LLOY to be weak during this time of the 3 weeks special Placing/offer/R I. not sure what it is at the end. ( this is normal during this times specially with Large subcriptions where shareholders sell some shares to take up the cheap ones, when in reality not need to do that as any premium is paid at the end.)

I think the idea of taxing banks for bail-outs is very fair for the taxpayers, as the banks would only also charge interest on a slight overdraft incurred.



Bank of Englands Paul Tucker says banks should be taxed to pay for bail-outs


The Bank of England's deputy Governor has raised the prospect of imposing an effective tax on Britain's banks to help shoulder the cost of the financial bail-outs.

In a speech which send shivers of concern down bank shareholders' spines, Paul Tucker raised the idea that in the future the Government should be able to "claim back the eventual cost" of a capital injection into stricken banks after the financial crisis is finished. The comments, made in a speech in Tokyo, come amid growing disquiet on both sides of the Atlantic that normal taxpayers are having to bear the burden of a financial collapse which was not their responsibility.

In his first major speech since his promotion to deputy Governor responsible for financial stability, Mr Tucker, one of the most highly-regarded figures in the UK central bank, said governments should consider forcing banks to set up "insurance" schemes to cover the cost of possible future bail-outs.

Governments currently have schemes designed to ensure that depositors have a certain amount of their cash refunded if their bank collapses.

Mr Tucker added: "If the authorities determined that a public equity injection was necessary in order to preserve stability, government could be authorised to provide the support, but with a right to claim back the eventual cost, if any, from an increased 'insurance' levy on the banking system over a period of years beginning after the crisis had clearly passed. Under that kind of regime, more of the cost of banking system failures could fall on the shareholders of banks generally rather than on the public purse."

Although he said the reforms would need to take place "over the medium term", he later indicated that such a regime might conceivably be imposed to mop up after the current crisis, saying that unlike deposit insurance schemes, this system may not need to be pre-funded.

In the wide-ranging speech, Mr Tucker also warned that authorities were still grappling with the question of how to cope with the collapse of an international investment bank, such as Lehman Brothers. He said that in the future it might make sense for these banks to have their own "credible resolution plans... with higher regulatory capital and liquidity charges entailed if they do not."

hlyeo98

re - I think the idea of taxing banks for bail-outs is very fair for the taxpayers

Maybe fair for the taxpapers, but you are not one of them, on hearing that you are "signing on"

You have not change the spots, though trying to camuflage your language

Just get lost "Scavenger shorter"

               

On a down Market LLOY is performing the best as is the only one on the bank sector recovering from the lows earlier

It will move lower, don't worry.

re -It will move lower, don't worry.

What a "Silly Willy" you are, saying that when already has happen 64.20p now from 64.80p with my post 1 hour earlier

Credit Suisse has an underperform for Lloyds, cutting target to 55p from 65p.

27-May-09 Lloyds Banking Group LLOY Oriel Add 64.10p - - Upgrade

lol........these institutions are ALL LOSERS. no-one believes them anymore EXCEPT HYLEO! so what if it goes to 55p.....so what if it goes to 40p, whats it going to be in 5 years? thats what most people buying major companies look for, not short term movements.

also, mr.boulton the most successful fund manager for decades is spending HIS OWN money on banks.........go on hyleo and tell mr.boulton he is a loser too!

i know which one i'd rather listen to

Is looking better now, we tested yesterday's close at 2.40pm and now we are close again though the market is still well down.

m
your comments may well be true but if you are investing with a 5 year outlook i would be very surprised. daily comments on price movements are irrelevent. its just 'noise'. and you seem to be very noisy.
h98 makes no such assertions.
regards to you
lkd

jkd

Try to find the reason for my post

My comments are very welcome for the LONGS specialy if they go againts the predictions of what it seems "your mate" h98,....... " it will go to 50 / 60 after going into X - placing."

So far is loosing the battle despite the market being down since then almost every day.

so without taking too much notice of your comments, mine are intended in "TAKING THE PISS" from the Scavenger.

                                           

MRSI
since your post is directed to me i shall reply. my post to m was directed to marni not to you. m is marni MRSI is you. sorry if you misunderstood. h98 is not my mate, i just dont like to see anyone having the PISS taken as you put it. especially when he is, in my opinion, and from reading many of his posts, mostly right.
regards to you
jkd

Empty vessels comes to mind......