bosley
- 20 Feb 2004 09:34
blinger
- 02 Feb 2006 12:00
- 14501 of 27111
"A la recherche du temps perdu",the chart reveals, and the posts here are about as voluminous as Prousts work- and as impenetrable.
Now which graph shows past glories and which future ?
hewittalan6
- 02 Feb 2006 13:51
- 14504 of 27111
I can see who, but not what you are replying to, Bos.
Bit of graph manipulation going on is there?
blinger
- 02 Feb 2006 13:57
- 14505 of 27111
Get me drift so-far?- with me?? .
DOWN goes SEO, its past glories are done with, finished caput, it is a dead SEO.
Now watch the share with the rising curve-yep it`s BPRG, AND IT`S UP!!!!
still no point in trying to teach new tricks to semi-dead dogs.
blinger
- 02 Feb 2006 13:59
- 14506 of 27111
robinhood
- 02 Feb 2006 14:28
- 14507 of 27111
Blinger, both charts from their resp. highs look like scheit. However I am surprised you did not notice that as you yourself are full of it. ( For your sake I hope your 12 p short on SEO will give you the runs so you will get rid of it)
blinger
- 02 Feb 2006 17:01
- 14508 of 27111
Another cretin for the squelch, which streets do they drag for these imbeciles?- there must be a special school for C4 social categories, odd how they all employ scatology in their " humour", bad potty training maybe??.
geddoutahere,
SEO finished DOWN!!!!
bosley
- 02 Feb 2006 17:45
- 14509 of 27111
skiddle-ee-dabba-doobie-diddle-ee-abba-doobie-dabba-deeeee
whoops!! scatting again!!
explosive
- 02 Feb 2006 20:28
- 14510 of 27111
Alan Post 14491 and the later. Thankyou, nice to know I'm judged on context rather than state of play.. Roll on the 24th March when ASDA's 12-month exclusive agreement for the application of Greenseal tray lidding and thermoforming comes to an end.
garyble
- 02 Feb 2006 20:33
- 14511 of 27111
Explosive,
I believe it is likely to be 28th July and not the 24th March. Has been discussd at length on FYB a while back along with sloppily the RNSs were worded.
andysmith
- 02 Feb 2006 22:05
- 14512 of 27111
Are you ready for the red ink results and confirmation of delays to Greenseal conversions, not just delays but how few have actually been converted at this stage? If so, expect the potential hammering of sp in the short-term.
SEO need the Asda xclusivity out of the way, Starpol approval from FDA and then ultimatley some sales with profits. The potential is clearly there but thats what we all thought this time last year!!
bosley
- 02 Feb 2006 22:21
- 14513 of 27111
andy, always nice to know your thoughts. tend to agree with you about short term price. the potential is still the same as last year, it's expectations that have changed .
niceonecyril
- 02 Feb 2006 22:37
- 14514 of 27111
Andy; Is that your belief or do you have knowledge to that effect?
cyril
blinger
- 03 Feb 2006 17:05
- 14515 of 27111
lol, the proof is there to behold
Another day NO $$$$$$$$
10p will look good after the next cash-burn warning (profit warning-whats that??)
hahahahahahahah!!!!!
hewittalan6
- 03 Feb 2006 17:10
- 14516 of 27111
Can only see the name, but if the tit is going on his usual style about SEO being crap and BPRG being fantastic (He really does think investing is the same as supporting Millwall FC) then SEO is level on the week and BPRG is down about 0.5%
garyble
- 03 Feb 2006 18:03
- 14517 of 27111
Alan,
Squelches disappear on here. The name appears on the other side.
hewittalan6
- 03 Feb 2006 18:23
- 14518 of 27111
My apologies. It was my shorthanded way of explaining that I know a post is missing and that I have but one poster squelched.
blinger
- 03 Feb 2006 18:28
- 14519 of 27111
Users you currently have squelched
bhunt1910
jammyjimmy
bosley
pisces
hewittalan6
garyble
explosive
robinhood
--------------
I just love reading the gaps in the thread
ROTFFLMFACBH&CO!!!!!!!!!
bhunt1910
- 03 Feb 2006 18:53
- 14520 of 27111
If blinger has got us all squelched - he must be talking to himself - but then again we all know that he cant resist reading what we are saying - so he hasn't really got any of us squelched
He must be feeling really lonely - but do I feel sorry for him - no.