Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

stanelco .......a new thread (SEO)     

bosley - 20 Feb 2004 09:34

Chart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Code=SEO&SiChart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Code=SEO&Si

for more information about stanelco click on the links.

driver's research page link
http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/posts.php?tid=7681#lastread
website link
http://www.stanelco.co.uk/index.htm


greekman - 09 Feb 2006 07:59 - 14596 of 27111

This looks good for both companies, as they can now put this behind them. As a SEO holder I am very pleased with the outcome as it was at the lower end of the scale that I thought SEO would have to pay. Good luck to both companies.

oblomov - 09 Feb 2006 08:05 - 14597 of 27111



Bet we dont hear much today from Blinger!

hewittalan6 - 09 Feb 2006 08:06 - 14598 of 27111

Good.

hewittalan6 - 09 Feb 2006 08:11 - 14599 of 27111

Yes, Greekman.
Crunching the numbers it is a dilution of the shares of about 0.6% (?).
I feel certain that SEO had a good deal more than this set aside as prudence would dictate, so I think it should have virtually zero effect and may (being hopeful here) even add to the available capital for other things.
Good result all round though. I am not even certain that 1million will cover BPRG legal costs so both sides obviously wanted to get it all finished as quickly as possible.
Alan

bhunt1910 - 09 Feb 2006 08:11 - 14600 of 27111

Well done Alan - I see the crystal ball is still working - or is this just the voice of experience where one is used to resolving simple issues such as this without making a fuss!!!

I hope no one was shorting this - as they will be suffering right now.

hewittalan6 - 09 Feb 2006 08:14 - 14601 of 27111

Just reasoned thinking Baza.
I sincerely hope explosive had his shorts covered. We had all been urging him for weeks to cover his position. I hope blinger had shorted even more, after all he also closed his long on BPRG just before two days of rises.
God I love it when an offensive poster finally declares his position AND gets it all so badly wrong.
Alan

ssanebs - 09 Feb 2006 08:33 - 14602 of 27111

seo stated in results last year that they had set aside 1m, and bprg also read that and it seems they settled for that figure. and bprg were insured for all their costs. So a good end to it all, but i'm sure seo are the winners, as they can still use the patents that put the deals on hold with cardinal

giggin - 09 Feb 2006 08:40 - 14603 of 27111

This is the first time that I am looking forward to blingers next post

bhunt1910 - 09 Feb 2006 08:44 - 14604 of 27111

I think Bling will be blong gone

hewittalan6 - 09 Feb 2006 08:45 - 14605 of 27111

Let me put you out of your misery then. Here it is days before he writes it;
Hah. 1mill. That will all come off the bottom line. Figures look bad this year now. Short this dog, its going nowhere. BPRG gave in cos the patents are worthless and these muppets paid 1mill for nothing. Plus costs of 20 Squillion.
Rights issue on its way. 4p by March. You rampers are all clowns.
Users you currently have squelched
Anyone who disagrees with you
Anyone who can see through you
Anyone with an IQ above 3

ROTFLHGFHGUYG

EWRobson - 09 Feb 2006 08:48 - 14606 of 27111

Excellent news. Pent up demand let loose. Suspect we may get further good news re InGel shortly. Glad I got back in last week.

Eric

kimoldfield - 09 Feb 2006 08:55 - 14607 of 27111

Wey, hey! Decided to have a lie in this morning cos I didn't think there would be any news until after 10. Brilliant stuff, well done Alan. (Got any tips!?).

We could see a bit of healthy competition between the 2 companieds from now on, to push them both forwards at a pace.

Does this mean the end of all the sniping? Which BB do I go to for the latest entertainment?
Thanks to all involved in good reasoning.
Kim

greekman - 09 Feb 2006 08:56 - 14608 of 27111

Just seen a news flash, re Tesco planning to open stores in the USA. As the largest supermarket by far in the UK, no doubt they will be looking to compete with Walmart. Yes I know that sounds stupid giving the massive power of Walmart but competition will be a natural progress, even in a small way. Customers will look at both where the stores are closely situated. Now if Walmart take Greenseal etc, and it proves successful, Tesco would have to follow. All imho of course.

kimoldfield - 09 Feb 2006 08:58 - 14609 of 27111

Alan, that sounds just like Blinger......I think I have it sussed folks, Alan IS Blinger!?! ;-)
Kim

hewittalan6 - 09 Feb 2006 09:00 - 14610 of 27111

AAAGGGHHH. You caught me out.
If you want to know more about bling, go to the nowt thread. I Googled him for a bit of fun. Also a very entertaining thread.
ENOUGH. He has ruined this thread for months and much as I am enjoying the "blinger is a prick" party, we are all better off for forgetting he even exists.
Alan

PS Tip for Kim. Don't wipe your arse on a broken bottle. ;-)

bhunt1910 - 09 Feb 2006 09:01 - 14611 of 27111

The advantage - hopefully - is that now that BPRG shareholders are in effect now shareholders of SEO, the sniping will stop and we can get back to balance debate.

robinhood - 09 Feb 2006 09:02 - 14612 of 27111

tune of the day: bling bling bling bling, plonk plonk plonk plonk

hewittalan6 - 09 Feb 2006 09:04 - 14613 of 27111

Speaking of which, Baza, what chance of the 2 now forming an alliance on the capsule front????

kimoldfield - 09 Feb 2006 09:10 - 14614 of 27111

Hopefully, there is nothing now stopping the 2 supporting each other and cooperating fully with new product invention. Wishful thinking? I suppose it cuts out the competion idea.

Biscuit - 09 Feb 2006 09:24 - 14615 of 27111

I think the sensible move for SEO would be to pay in cash, we all expect the share price to move north over the next few months, so, if they paid in shares, we'd actually be over paying them as I would argue SEO shares are slightly undervalued at the moment.

Biscuit
Register now or login to post to this thread.