bosley
- 20 Feb 2004 09:34
garyble
- 12 Feb 2006 14:35
- 14757 of 27111
CBB,
I make it 2.56 in 10 years. Not sure what you've extrapolated?
However, you'd probably guess I'm a bit more optimistic about the sp.
EWRobson
- 12 Feb 2006 22:35
- 14758 of 27111
sd I think the dilution is less than 1%, thus my reference to peanuts. With the patent balance in SEO's favour, it would appear that SEO were willing to give ground to get rid of a troublesome irritant. The perceived difference between the companies is that SEO get on with it whilst B**G spend much of tehir time defending their intellectual property. However, it would be helpful to have JohnGTudor's comments as a holder (perhaps former) of both.
I hope the market is not expecting much from the results. Evolution say 600K sales and a loss of 2.4m. We know there are going to be very few Greenseal sales included so the interest should really be directed to what is said about 2006. Evolution are looking for 18.2m sales with very small PBT. As I see it, that assumes that the 200 target is achieved with ASDA and as much again from Greenseal or other products. The downside would come if that is heavily marked down and there is no significant news of other earning streams, e.g. Greenseal in the US.
Given adverse market reaction, there could be a sudden drop to the resistance level of 12p. Wouldn't the problem with a Stop Loss be that the sp goes straight through and there is no trading at your SL level. Or do you do a Guaranteed Stop Loss which I believes comes at a cost.
This all sounds a mite pessimistic. In fact, I am reasonably positive: as stated earlier I feel that good news could move the sp quite quickly to the levels tested last year. This could also be rapid as demand could be heavy and the MMs would just respond by a heavy hoist up of the sp. The potential N to S price movement is thus 5:1 which, given that one move is as likely as the other from where I stand or sit, gives good reason for buying in. Mind I see 50% upside in both AZM and ASC with negligible downside so I have a heavier weighting in each - also DGT and PXS but I can't trade those as CFDs.
Eric
blinger
- 13 Feb 2006 09:07
- 14759 of 27111
Selling momentum building now in SEO as BPRG show an RNS-might be time to move back in there again-long- not while the spread is anti though.
The lack of nous on investment is revealed on another bb, where market makers are slated for the poor share price of SEO,which is of course a SetsMM equity, `TOCH lamp and dim` come to mind
oblomov
- 13 Feb 2006 09:31
- 14760 of 27111
Bling,
we currently (for today) have Buys at 3,174,977 and Sells at 1,153,887
Could you enlighten one with a 'lack of nous on investment' as to how this indicates 'selling momentum building'?
blinger
- 13 Feb 2006 09:40
- 14761 of 27111
a further 500,000 sells gone through.
hewittalan6
- 13 Feb 2006 09:40
- 14762 of 27111
Ignore him Ob. He's Testiculating* again.
Alan
*Testiculating. Derivative of the word gesticulating, meaning to use ones hands to talk bollocks. From Oxford English dictionary.
blinger
- 13 Feb 2006 09:43
- 14763 of 27111
Sells 1.5m buys 50k
bhunt1910
- 13 Feb 2006 09:46
- 14764 of 27111
Is he still posting on here - just ignore him - he will eventually go away as he will have no one to talk to.
blinger
- 13 Feb 2006 09:48
- 14765 of 27111
MAM would you please advise how you treat posters who post incorrect volumes, I have used your SEO figures which seem to be at odds with the Oblomov
person, iii, and ADVFN etc. agree with your vol.
blinger
- 13 Feb 2006 09:52
- 14766 of 27111
STANELCO (LSE:SEO.L) -from Yahoo
Last Trade: 15.00 p
Trade Time: 9:34AM
Change: 0.00 (0.00%)
Prev Close: 15.00
Open: 15.00
Bid: 15.00 x 100000
Ask: 15.25 x 260893
1y Target Est: 24.00
Day's Range: 15.00 - 15.25
52wk Range: 12.50 - 31.75
Volume: 1,568,362
-------------
blinger
- 13 Feb 2006 09:54
- 14767 of 27111
An example of lack of nous!!!!????
--------------------
oblomov - 13 Feb 2006 09:31 - 14760 of 14766
Bling,
we currently (for today) have Buys at 3,174,977 and Sells at 1,153,887
Could you enlighten one with a 'lack of nous on investment' as to how this indicates 'selling momentum building'?
-------------------
the usual BS from a master of it, and the paroniser falls
ROTFFLMFAO!!!!
bhunt1910
- 13 Feb 2006 09:57
- 14768 of 27111
Anyone else having problems with Stock watch ?? - the only share that is showing no info against it is SEO - already reported to MAM
hewittalan6
- 13 Feb 2006 09:58
- 14769 of 27111
Mines fine, Baza.
robinhood
- 13 Feb 2006 09:59
- 14770 of 27111
re 14740 . Anyone shorting crude with current instability in the Middle East is off his rocker. Any news from there will only drive prices further up. Chance of making $2.00 p/bbl versus losing $10.00 p/bbl are odds nobody in their right mind likes- but hey we're talking bling bling here so that explains a lot
blinger
- 13 Feb 2006 10:06
- 14771 of 27111
http://futures.tradingcharts.com/charts/BC36.GIF
lack of nous , I guess some people rob from the poor and give to the rich, sad.
blinger
- 13 Feb 2006 10:09
- 14772 of 27111
anyone got the SEO volumes right yet
ROTFFLMFACB&HO
ps there are a few trades on `Virtx`, thats a Swiss market-aaaahhh forget it
hewittalan6
- 13 Feb 2006 10:15
- 14773 of 27111
I've got the volumes the same as blinger,but what he fails to point out is that when trading is like this, with sells outstripping buys quite dramatically and the sp refuses to fall, it is often indicative of a large buy being worked.
We will see.
Alan
blinger
- 13 Feb 2006 10:21
- 14774 of 27111
Oblomov,
if (as you should) you would like to save face and give me a grovelling apology via a private e-mail, that will suffice, I will also be very gentlemanly and NOT re-post it, [with it being private you understand, as that is the point of , erm the word private]
toodle-pip.
kimoldfield
- 13 Feb 2006 10:21
- 14775 of 27111
Yes blinger, you are right, there are more sells than buys which simply means that this share is still being traded, as is BPRG, why? because both companies have survived the cc, both companies are worth trading, both companies are well worth investing in! Who knows what will happen to either/both of them in the future, for now they both have excellent product pipelines, it is in the interests of both companies to survive as they need to use each others patents. Perhaps most importantly these days though is that they are BRITISH and we should all be encouraging survival here in the UK (no offence to foriegn investors, we need them!) So c'mon blinger old chap, let's stop being negative eh? I hold in both companies, have done for some time and intend to do so after they have BOTH become mega successful!!
By the way what DOES ROTFFLMFACB&HO stand for?, haven't posted on BBs long enough to work it out!