Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

stanelco .......a new thread (SEO)     

bosley - 20 Feb 2004 09:34

Chart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Code=SEO&SiChart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Code=SEO&Si

for more information about stanelco click on the links.

driver's research page link
http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/posts.php?tid=7681#lastread
website link
http://www.stanelco.co.uk/index.htm


blinger - 13 Feb 2006 09:43 - 14763 of 27111

Sells 1.5m buys 50k

bhunt1910 - 13 Feb 2006 09:46 - 14764 of 27111

Is he still posting on here - just ignore him - he will eventually go away as he will have no one to talk to.

blinger - 13 Feb 2006 09:48 - 14765 of 27111

MAM would you please advise how you treat posters who post incorrect volumes, I have used your SEO figures which seem to be at odds with the Oblomov
person, iii, and ADVFN etc. agree with your vol.

blinger - 13 Feb 2006 09:52 - 14766 of 27111

STANELCO (LSE:SEO.L) -from Yahoo
Last Trade: 15.00 p
Trade Time: 9:34AM
Change: 0.00 (0.00%)
Prev Close: 15.00
Open: 15.00
Bid: 15.00 x 100000
Ask: 15.25 x 260893
1y Target Est: 24.00
Day's Range: 15.00 - 15.25
52wk Range: 12.50 - 31.75
Volume: 1,568,362
-------------

blinger - 13 Feb 2006 09:54 - 14767 of 27111

An example of lack of nous!!!!????
--------------------

oblomov - 13 Feb 2006 09:31 - 14760 of 14766
Bling,

we currently (for today) have Buys at 3,174,977 and Sells at 1,153,887

Could you enlighten one with a 'lack of nous on investment' as to how this indicates 'selling momentum building'?
-------------------
the usual BS from a master of it, and the paroniser falls

ROTFFLMFAO!!!!

bhunt1910 - 13 Feb 2006 09:57 - 14768 of 27111

Anyone else having problems with Stock watch ?? - the only share that is showing no info against it is SEO - already reported to MAM

hewittalan6 - 13 Feb 2006 09:58 - 14769 of 27111

Mines fine, Baza.

robinhood - 13 Feb 2006 09:59 - 14770 of 27111

re 14740 . Anyone shorting crude with current instability in the Middle East is off his rocker. Any news from there will only drive prices further up. Chance of making $2.00 p/bbl versus losing $10.00 p/bbl are odds nobody in their right mind likes- but hey we're talking bling bling here so that explains a lot

blinger - 13 Feb 2006 10:06 - 14771 of 27111

http://futures.tradingcharts.com/charts/BC36.GIF

lack of nous , I guess some people rob from the poor and give to the rich, sad.

blinger - 13 Feb 2006 10:09 - 14772 of 27111

anyone got the SEO volumes right yet
ROTFFLMFACB&HO

ps there are a few trades on `Virtx`, thats a Swiss market-aaaahhh forget it

hewittalan6 - 13 Feb 2006 10:15 - 14773 of 27111

I've got the volumes the same as blinger,but what he fails to point out is that when trading is like this, with sells outstripping buys quite dramatically and the sp refuses to fall, it is often indicative of a large buy being worked.
We will see.
Alan

blinger - 13 Feb 2006 10:21 - 14774 of 27111

Oblomov,
if (as you should) you would like to save face and give me a grovelling apology via a private e-mail, that will suffice, I will also be very gentlemanly and NOT re-post it, [with it being private you understand, as that is the point of , erm the word private]

toodle-pip.

kimoldfield - 13 Feb 2006 10:21 - 14775 of 27111

Yes blinger, you are right, there are more sells than buys which simply means that this share is still being traded, as is BPRG, why? because both companies have survived the cc, both companies are worth trading, both companies are well worth investing in! Who knows what will happen to either/both of them in the future, for now they both have excellent product pipelines, it is in the interests of both companies to survive as they need to use each others patents. Perhaps most importantly these days though is that they are BRITISH and we should all be encouraging survival here in the UK (no offence to foriegn investors, we need them!) So c'mon blinger old chap, let's stop being negative eh? I hold in both companies, have done for some time and intend to do so after they have BOTH become mega successful!!

By the way what DOES ROTFFLMFACB&HO stand for?, haven't posted on BBs long enough to work it out!

driver - 13 Feb 2006 10:32 - 14776 of 27111

kimoldfield
He won't tell you unless your in the masons.

kimoldfield - 13 Feb 2006 10:35 - 14777 of 27111

Ah, no good then - although one of my locals is the Masons Arms, I'm in for a pint now and then, would that do?!

hewittalan6 - 13 Feb 2006 10:35 - 14778 of 27111

Kim,
Its the sweetest little phrase. It means Roll On The F**ing Floor, Laughing F***ing My Arse, Cock, Balls & Arse Off.
This from a man who expects to be treat as something more than a silly little boy in a playground.
Alan

kimoldfield - 13 Feb 2006 10:37 - 14779 of 27111

Thanks Alan, thought it might be something like that, proves he's not a woman then?!

hewittalan6 - 13 Feb 2006 10:42 - 14780 of 27111

You should meet some of the women I know!!

kimoldfield - 13 Feb 2006 10:45 - 14781 of 27111

:-)

driver - 13 Feb 2006 10:49 - 14782 of 27111

Al
You must be in the Masons then?
Register now or login to post to this thread.