Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

MELDEX. Double your money- quicktime. (MDX)     

kitosdad - 12 Dec 2007 16:20

The engines have fired up at last for MDX. ( BPRG ) At long last they are being recognised for the force they will become over the next two years. On the cusp of disclosing huge revenue-earning deals with Global pharmacists. These have been hinted at as being unrolled before the years end, but may be in the next days.You still have time to get in at a bargain-basement price before the SP takes off for real shortly.

Chart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Code=MDX&Si

tabasco - 31 Jul 2008 14:33 - 1477 of 8631

Alison.You dont even think! Let alone like me!

Dil - 31 Jul 2008 14:34 - 1478 of 8631

we aint investors:-)

tabasco - 31 Jul 2008 14:37 - 1479 of 8631

YesI can see that!

ptholden - 31 Jul 2008 14:57 - 1480 of 8631

Does anyone know what the average sector PE is for a MDX 'type' company?
+
Is the figure of 213,866,433 issued shares correct or did they knock out another load post AGM?

Dil - 31 Jul 2008 15:22 - 1481 of 8631

PE ???? .... don't you have to make a profit to have a PE ?

tabasco - 31 Jul 2008 15:30 - 1482 of 8631

No! .but take 5p..put your shorts on and fu*k off up the M25 in the fast lane! You will soon learn about PE!

Big Al - 31 Jul 2008 15:33 - 1483 of 8631

Well spotted, Dil.

I seem to remember forecasts saying this lot would be highly profitable in 2004. Still waiting.

Nasty drop today after yesterday's false dawn. ;-))

tabasco - 31 Jul 2008 15:36 - 1484 of 8631

Want to run a relay alison!

Big Al - 31 Jul 2008 15:42 - 1485 of 8631

What about yield (erm), ROCE (joke!), NAV (zip!), etc, etc?

tabasco - 31 Jul 2008 15:47 - 1486 of 8631

What about a 40 ton juggernaut!

Dil - 31 Jul 2008 15:52 - 1487 of 8631

Yeah but they do release some nice RNS's Al ... "jam tomorrow" , "possible takeover" , "would have made a profit if there were no accounting standards" etc etc.

Highly entertaining if nothing else.

tabasco - 31 Jul 2008 15:57 - 1488 of 8631

Not half as entertaining as Eddie Stobart plastered over your shorts!

Big Al - 31 Jul 2008 16:02 - 1489 of 8631

They always give me a giggle, Dil. A bit like the "investors" on here. I don't find them quite as much fun as the ADVFN lot were, but this lot are still around, not having been wiped out. ;-)))

I did feel sorry for a few over the other side, though, espcially that rafboy (?). He'd got completely caught up and sunk his whole pension into this one company. Nuts!!

Big Al - 31 Jul 2008 16:03 - 1490 of 8631

The only thing plastered over my shorts will be you when I take my morning constitutional, Tabatha. LOL!

tabasco - 31 Jul 2008 16:09 - 1491 of 8631

Sorry alison I dont hang out in doorwayslooking for soup! You will have to sh*t in your begging bowl!

Big Al - 31 Jul 2008 16:15 - 1492 of 8631

I'll s**t you out anywhere you like.

ptholden - 31 Jul 2008 16:17 - 1493 of 8631

Well Dil according to their last set of accounts MDX managed to make a profit of just under 1M with a reported diluted EPS of 0.5p.

The reason I asked the question (although I would never base an investment decision on PE) is that today MDX are trading on a whopping PE of 66. MDX kindly provided a proforma projection within their last accounts stating that had the acquisitions been included over a 12 month period, a profit of 3.7m would have been realised. Even with this greatly enhanced 'potential' profit their PE would still have been somewhere in the region of 19, possibly close to the sector average. Admittedly PE is historical in this context and makes no allowance for growth, but MDX have failed to grow their own products very much in the last four years from a revenue / profit perspective. Seems to me that MDX is pretty much fairly valued right now and why would anyone want to offer a premium to the SP to take them over. Possibly synergies / cost savings with saimilar product lines will play a part.

tabasco - 31 Jul 2008 16:18 - 1494 of 8631

Now what are you saying Alison? and think about it very carefully before you answer!

Big Al - 31 Jul 2008 16:33 - 1495 of 8631

Why?

Dil - 31 Jul 2008 16:46 - 1496 of 8631

Agree pt thats why I laffed when everyone was hyping a 120p-150p takeover earlier this year.

Be lucky to get 60p in the current climate.

Where's Scotty ... his mum locked him in his bedroom or something ?
Register now or login to post to this thread.