for more information about stanelco click on the links.

driver's research page link
http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/posts.php?tid=7681#lastread
website link
http://www.stanelco.co.uk/index.htm

I've got the volumes the same as blinger,but what he fails to point out is that when trading is like this, with sells outstripping buys quite dramatically and the sp refuses to fall, it is often indicative of a large buy being worked.
We will see.
Alan

Oblomov,
if (as you should) you would like to save face and give me a grovelling apology via a private e-mail, that will suffice, I will also be very gentlemanly and NOT re-post it, [with it being private you understand, as that is the point of , erm the word private]

toodle-pip.

Yes blinger, you are right, there are more sells than buys which simply means that this share is still being traded, as is BPRG, why? because both companies have survived the cc, both companies are worth trading, both companies are well worth investing in! Who knows what will happen to either/both of them in the future, for now they both have excellent product pipelines, it is in the interests of both companies to survive as they need to use each others patents. Perhaps most importantly these days though is that they are BRITISH and we should all be encouraging survival here in the UK (no offence to foriegn investors, we need them!) So c'mon blinger old chap, let's stop being negative eh? I hold in both companies, have done for some time and intend to do so after they have BOTH become mega successful!!

By the way what DOES ROTFFLMFACB&HO stand for?, haven't posted on BBs long enough to work it out!

kimoldfield
He won't tell you unless your in the masons.

Ah, no good then - although one of my locals is the Masons Arms, I'm in for a pint now and then, would that do?!

Kim,
Its the sweetest little phrase. It means Roll On The F**ing Floor, Laughing F***ing My Arse, Cock, Balls & Arse Off.
This from a man who expects to be treat as something more than a silly little boy in a playground.
Alan

Thanks Alan, thought it might be something like that, proves he's not a woman then?!

You should meet some of the women I know!!

:-)

Al
You must be in the Masons then?

Regular on a Friday night, mate.
Pop in anytime and I'll buy you a drink.
You'll recognise me. I'll be the one in a skin tight rubber dress, Fishnet stockings and a sink plunger tied to each knee.
I'll carry a copy of the "Socialist Worker" so you can tell me apart from the rest of the regulars.
Alan

kimoldfield- squelched, what a bore.

nothing from goblomov then, early bath???

Yessss! I've been squelched, not controversial enough for blinger, cardinal sin speaking sense!! (In blinger's book anyway) leaving him/her unsquelched though 'cos every one of his posts makes me FLMFBCAHO&WTPMP

I posted the figures shown by MAM at the time - Fridays figures, maybe? SEO not coming up on my 'Watch list' screen.

Gremlins?

well I go away for a week and not only does the court case get sorted, the sp looks healthy and blinger takes a deserved shoeing.
lifes great!
hope you are all well- and long.
roll on end of month results........Maybe the seo flight is about to depart.
I't's been soo long my passports out of date and my waistlines expanded several inches from all the crap eaten in the departure lounge.........

Yep - just checked Friday's figures. They are the figs I posted - dont know why they were coming up.

ROFLOL!!!!
The vol. figures I quoted were from MAM and 4 other sources,trying to diss people with wrong information is VERY suspect in investment circles, something stinks, maybe the bedding needs changed?

Sellers beat buyers 12:1, a fall of 5% today would be nice, and probable.
This co. is full of wind, the forecasts are all to pot.
Brent crude MAR. is down 5 pts.who is this teeny- weeny person, seems to bring good vibes for shorters.

I have copied this across from BPRG as I think it answers a number of questions that have been posed re the patents etc.

I hope Chay does not mind - as it also crystalises some of the thinking behind the ocs.

Chay01 - 13 Feb'06 - 15:39 - 1492 of 1503


Great news this morning that Tampa can produce cGMP film and Bio will be bringing its products to market via Dexo as well as supplying film for partners. The company is no longer fully dependent on other film suppliers or on partners to bring products, incorporating Bios technology, to market within their own timeframes.

The dispute with SEO is yesterdays news now and the company is rapidly moving ahead with its focus on commercialisation without the added distraction of an ongoing cc. The purchase of Dexo and the JV with Crescent Pharma will enable Bio to pursue many revenue-enhancing prospects in the near future.

There has been a lot of confusion over the settlement agreement so I spoke with DF earlier today to clarify the situation.

Questions and answers:

1. Can you confirm that bio owns P1 and SEO P2 and 3 as determined by the patent court?

BioProgress own the whole of patent 1 (in all jurisdictions worldwide) and SEO patents 2 and 3.

2. Will SEO be able to license P1 for pharmaceutical use and if so are they likely to progress InGel with Cardinal?

BioProgress has granted SEO a non-exclusive license to P1. There is no restriction on SEO licensing RF welding of capsules to the likes of Cardinal. BioProgress feel they are in a strong position to commercialise the IP with the existing Swollo technology.

3. Will SEO have to compensate Bio for the use of P1 and will Bio have to compensate SEO for the use of P2/3?

No

4. Is Bio likely to exploit the patents for non-pharma use?

Bio has unrestricted use of P1, 2 and 3 and does not need SEOs consent to license the patents to any company it wishes to.

5. Did Bio compromise on the deal to avoid the case being dragged out over an extended time period? Apart from ownership of P2/3, the ability to prolong the litigation seemed to be SEOs only trump card.

Bio achieved the best deal possible and now has certainty with regard to the future. More was achieved via the oocs than would have been possible via the court process. Shared ownership of P2 and 3 would have been worthless as permission of use would have had to be granted by the other owner in order to use the technology. Also, to stop SEO using patent 1 would have required further costly court action without guarantees of the outcome.

The time and cost elements were very important issues e.g. even though Bio proved entitlement to P1 they still would have had to go thru the lengthy and costly process of proving that entitlement in all the foreign jurisdictions where SEO had registered the patents.

6. Bio has gained access to P2/3, received 1m as part of the settlement terms and are now able to commercialise Swollo incorporating RF capsule sealing. Management time can also be used to grow the business rather than be distracted by litigation. Are there any other benefits to settling the case now rather than letting it run its course?

There were no certainties if the case was left to run its course. Bio had a strong case but the court may have sided with SEO on some points. It is now certain that Bio owns P1 and has unconstrained use of P2 and 3.

A damages claim would have taken years to conclude thru the courts, which would have been very expensive and taken up valuable management time. The award of damages was also very uncertain, as there were only potential rather than actual losses incurred so a huge award was very unlikely. Bio would only have received part of its total costs.

Its time to concentrate on the future and realise the rapid progress that the company is now making. Any thoughts that nothing is happening behind the scenes when news flow is quiet can be totally dispelled.

I think special thanks should go to Richard Trevillion for his sterling efforts and strategic guidance of the company since he took over the role of CEO. Working a 22 hour day seven days a week may not be too much of an exaggeration considering he has had to take on many of DFs duties recently (due to DFs back problems). Having the worlds premier non-gelatin film system is one thing but we are fortunate now that we have hard working, honest personnel, within the company, who are able to bring it to the market place.


Chay.

PS The company is now in a closed period - Preliminary Results for the year ended 31 December 2005 should be announced around the same time as last year (21/3/05).

The brokers note (being written by Elizabeth Klein) will be out soon dont think it was being held up by the cc though.

DOWN again!!!!!!!!!