bosley
- 20 Feb 2004 09:34
garyble
- 16 Feb 2006 20:17
- 14885 of 27111
Sounds familiar!
cheshirepig
- 16 Feb 2006 20:24
- 14886 of 27111
Looks familiar?
garyble
- 16 Feb 2006 20:38
- 14887 of 27111
squelched!
cheshirepig
- 16 Feb 2006 20:39
- 14888 of 27111
gay?
bosley
- 16 Feb 2006 21:18
- 14889 of 27111
and there's me thinking he couldn't get any sadder .......
EWRobson
- 16 Feb 2006 23:12
- 14890 of 27111
biscuit: assume its a serious question (mind I like cheshire pig's taste in women, if not in shares!). Anything from 12p to 30p. It could still break south - rate that at 20%; but could happen if Greenseal progress with ASDA is disappointing and no compensating news. It has to break out, because of the chart squeeze. Therefore 80% chance of break north. If report is relatively neutral in sense that ASDA progress is confirmed, plus lets say decent Starpol progress, then should start testing resistance level at around 18p. If we also have a Greenseal contract in US, then we are fulfilling assumed criteria of last summer and the next realistic resistance level is 28p. You pays your money....! Interesting times ahead. But its better to be in because this is a share of the future, not the past. Real technological strengths, innovative management and I like their business formula based on licensing fees.
Eric
Biscuit
- 17 Feb 2006 08:16
- 14891 of 27111
Hi Eric,
Thanks for your thoughts. I think Greenseal will be on track, installations were always heavily back weighted. To be honest the 30+ and 50+ installations mentioned in the Trading Update RNS would suggest that they are nearly half way there and we're roughly half way through the exclusivity period. I believe Martin Wagner had worked on a "supplier matrix" when he joined the company (can't remember where I'd read that though). With full commercial trials now going on in the US and a management who appear to be very capable, I feel very confident in the future. Just my opinion of course DYOR.
Cheers,
Biscuit
robinhood
- 17 Feb 2006 11:50
- 14892 of 27111
oh bling oh bling, I am honestly not one for wishing anyone bad luck on his/hers positions , but find it quite amusing that SEO is holding quite easily at the 15 p mark and to see brent crude up $1.20 p/bbl......
giggin
- 17 Feb 2006 11:57
- 14893 of 27111
Blinger recommended shorting FOGL on Jan27th, then they were 1.35, today they are 1.82. What an investment genius he is.
bhunt1910
- 17 Feb 2006 15:01
- 14894 of 27111
Thats why no one on this thread takes him seriously - quite a comedienne really - also why he is squelched by most.
I did not think he was still posting
explosive
- 17 Feb 2006 19:39
- 14895 of 27111
Nope hes counting whats left of his last million. Bling not only shorts shares but also his own finances it would seam....
kimoldfield
- 17 Feb 2006 20:11
- 14896 of 27111
Too much of a coincidence this, a mate of mine in Southampton says he saw someone dressed as Ronald McDonald today, near Marchwood (those who don't know where Stanelco are, look up their address), there is a Professor named Ronald MacDonald who is Professor of International Finance; Blinger has gone missing - 1 + 1 equals whatever you want it to be - Blinger wants to suppress SEO shareprice until he has earned enough from his job, whichever one, to buy more shares because he knows a deal with McDonald's is imminent?!?
stockdog
- 17 Feb 2006 20:49
- 14897 of 27111
Bling, bling!
Who's there?
Bill.
Bill who?
Bill Ionslost-Shortingseo.
classyglassy
- 18 Feb 2006 20:18
- 14898 of 27111
Could someone explain how a short on this share, over 9 months could lose money, is the chart wrong?
garyble
- 18 Feb 2006 22:19
- 14899 of 27111
What's your point?.....No explanation required!
You're either long or short either way you have to hold your nerve and have a strategy.
Would you short it at its current level?
classyglassy
- 18 Feb 2006 22:37
- 14900 of 27111
answer the Q??
How could you lose money shorting for the last 9 months, its a simple one!, if it was possible why all the hatred against those who did??, time to grow up a little on this thread, shares are there to make a few bob, the bank don`t ask how profiteers made it , only fools turn down a gain.
garyble
- 18 Feb 2006 23:07
- 14901 of 27111
I see no hatred for anyone who makes money one way or the other. What I do see is a reaction by some to the inane comments of those who have a short term objective and wish to talk the sp down.
Some believe that comment on BB's cannot directly impact on the sp, but still, wishing the sp to fall and actively talking it down is not only negative but will obviously irk a few.
Personally I'm up ~90% on a long position in a year, and that is from doing practically nothing.
Whatever your strategy I hope you make enough money to be happy.
classyglassy
- 19 Feb 2006 10:01
- 14902 of 27111
I thank you for your kind words, however why the animosity from the minority, to those wanting to "talk the share down"?, It hasn`t exactly made any $$$ for people holding it for nearly a year, and actively talking it down is no worse than " "actively talking it up" surely, this is what such web-sites as this are for.
Personally I am chuffed that you are making 90%, but its not a profit until in the bank, and with respect you must have missed 180% profit at the sp top.
Best of luck.
bhunt1910
- 19 Feb 2006 10:09
- 14903 of 27111
I thonk anyone who went short 9 months ago will have made a handsome profit - especially if they got out at the botton when it dropped to 12p.
I think the issue being discussed is that there have been one or two that have been calling it short since December - suggesting that it will drop to 10p and below and constantly deramping.
Now everyone to their own strategy - but I would not be short on this right now - although I wish I had been when it dropped from 32 to 12 - hindsight is a wonderful thing.
I managed a top up when it dropped to 12 - and I still have those - as well as those that I bought at 6p (and 26p).
I still feel very optimistic about SEO in the long term and expect to see a steady rise this year as deals are announced.
Of course - there is no such thing as a dead cert and I continue to monitor my risk - but for now - my eyes are wide open and I think as I have done for a while that the potential of this company outweighs the risk.
C'est la vie
Baza
Baza
BKK2
- 19 Feb 2006 11:06
- 14904 of 27111
Well Mr classyglassy,You might not have any problem talking down People's investments so as to make money yourself,but I consider it unnecessary and underhand,especially when your posts are none factual and just drivel such as posts like, short this dog down to 8p,I am an investor stanelco,if you have factual statements to make,fair enough,but if you're like most shorters,I hope you loose a packet
Peter