inbsuk
- 15 Jul 2004 00:35
Forward looking and dedication will make "Jarvis" a name to remember. IMO
tiltoman
- 17 May 2005 14:27
- 149 of 172
sequestor.
care to elaborate?
Sequestor
- 17 May 2005 20:55
- 150 of 172
several hedge funds are rumoured to be on " the edge", if they control 80%, and they die, well, interesting?
iturama
- 23 May 2005 14:28
- 151 of 172
Bad news indeed.
JARVIS PLC
ON-GOING WORKING CAPITAL AND RESTRUCTURING DISCUSSIONS
The Company notes the recent press report regarding its ongoing discussions with
lenders. Jarvis has reached agreement in principle with Deutsche Bank for the
provision of further short term loan facilities of up to 31.4 million to meet
its immediate and short term funding requirements and also a balance sheet
restructuring, combining a debt-for-equity conversion and subsequent 50 million
equity raising. The proposals are subject to contract, agreement of the
Company's other lenders (which is currently being sought) and will, on signing,
be subject to conditions and approvals.
The precise form of the debt-for-equity conversion is still being discussed but
it is likely that it would leave existing shareholders with 5 per cent. or less
of the equity value of the group following the conversion, depending on the
structure that is implemented. It is envisaged that this debt-for-equity
conversion would be immediately followed by an equity raising open to holders of
the share capital of the group as enlarged by the debt for equity conversion.
The terms of the equity raising would be such that the shares subscribed in this
equity raising would represent substantially all the resulting equity value of
the group. The combination of the debt-for-equity conversion and the equity
raising will strengthen the group's balance sheet and reduce the group's debt to
a low level.
Whilst these negotiations are at an advanced stage, there can be no certainty
that final agreement will be reached.
Contact details:
Bridget Fury, Merlin 020 7653 6620
akel44
- 23 May 2005 15:46
- 152 of 172
it seems they want back all your shares for nothing
i nearly bought these too,
welassal
- 08 Jul 2005 09:20
- 153 of 172
Jarvis going up everyday,any one know why !!
TheMaster
- 08 Jul 2005 10:06
- 154 of 172
Olympic construction projects, remember Norris has alot of contacts in London.
welassal
- 13 Jul 2005 14:04
- 155 of 172
What is happning !! it's going down since yesterday any one know why ?but few buyer today!
TheMaster
- 13 Jul 2005 16:04
- 156 of 172
MM playing games, sp just shot back up.
ahoj
- 15 Jul 2005 12:58
- 157 of 172
Any comment please:
How far can it fall?
How many times have the restructured/issued shares?
akel44
- 18 Jul 2005 12:59
- 158 of 172
http://www.companyannouncements.net/cgi-bin/articles/200507181200009799O.html
hangon
- 18 Jul 2005 16:46
- 159 of 172
This thread is now: Jarvis Won't survive ( it won't will it?)*
C'mon guys, don't be so negative, there's still the prospect/excitement watching their Auditors (of past years) squirming-about explaining why they managed to overlook what was like the chip-pan catching fire when the locum chippy was sweeping the floor, to create a good impression.
When will Auditors work in the interest of shareholders, Customers, Employees and the Government (as tax-receiver and Dole-provider)? - until this nettle is grasped we must expect major companies to fold regularly, with considerable fall-out. At least when a tiddler goes it doesn't affect a whole City. Marconi, Mayflower - the list gets longer.
*(Course it won't - who would give them a contract and be willing to pay a fair price? - deals they'll attract are cash-on-completion, if you please)
jk9
- 10 Aug 2005 17:43
- 160 of 172
http://www.indepen.co.uk/weeklynews.html
Jarvis investors approve rescue
Shareholders of Jarvis, the engineering services business, have approved a financial restructuring scheme that hands 95 per cent of the firms equity to its creditors in return for the cancellation of 350m of debt. The company had warned it would implement the plan, which it sees as the only alternative to insolvency, even without the blessing of investors.
Jarvis has announced the appointment of Richard Entwhistle, former director of the rail business of its rival Amey, as Chief Operating Officer.
isn't this a pretty risky move for somebody to leave the somewhat more stable environment of Amey? I'm thinking he must be fairly certain the company will survive.. could there be a recovery opportunity in the offing? any thoughts??
squidd
- 11 Aug 2005 04:14
- 161 of 172
jk9: Not strictly a recovery stock. Theirs is a strategy for survival with a mediocre future and little scope for small investors seeking an exciting ride.
sd.
ahoj
- 12 Oct 2005 13:06
- 162 of 172
They don't need money anymore. Good U trurn.
http://www.moneyam.com/action/news/showArticle?id=1004585
Jarvis says will keep highway maintenance business previously earmarked for sale
hangon
- 21 Oct 2005 13:17
- 163 of 172
Lovell has bought a big chunk of JRVS also - so does he feel lucky?
Well maybe, but then he felt lucky enough to get into JRVS a while ago and look where that got him.......the real problem IMHO is "who will give them an order?" - I doubt if they'll be working on the railway for a while and their reputation in schools is poor to say the least - So where does JRVS excell, where can they pick up a fat contract and perform well, quickly and satisfy the client?
Answers on a very small postcard (please remember the stamp) - I just don't know - they have shown determination to be rubbish in all departments - unless I'm overlooking some new business-angle that has eluded me - or there is an angle that needs incompetance and is willing to pay for it.
No? - Well that's it then, expect the sp to halve until they get a better reputation - and if Retail is anything to go by - you build a good reputation over many Years and a bad one over as many Months.
I used to hold JRVS in the hope of recovery.......not any more.......but good luck to all who sail in her.
BigTed
- 23 Nov 2007 08:48
- 165 of 172
fairly well overdone... possibly... maybe...???
hangon
- 23 Nov 2007 12:19
- 167 of 172
Oh dear 20p - it doesn't get much worse than this ( answers on a postcard, pse)....yet today there seems to be a DCB.
The RNS suggest this year is material below - - with a substantial loss.....and it also say the Gov and Railtrack is committed to an on-going program of mainteneance -
SO why should anyone think this means "Jarvis"..?
If that's what the Directors mean then they've bungled it again - - - but I suspect they chose their words correctly - that is there is NO Contract in place which means JRVS will be OK this next year - - - they will have to make long and expensive bids for this work - which is shorthand for "unprofitable"
So, holders, out there - - - - Do You Feel Lucky ?
It's about time the Drectors resigned, without bonus, severance, or any other goodies - just Go, - - Please.