for more information about stanelco click on the links.

driver's research page link
http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/posts.php?tid=7681#lastread
website link
http://www.stanelco.co.uk/index.htm

has anyone got L 2 please

We should email SEO and ask them to make a statement regarding the misinformation that as been posted on the internet on the R F lid trial with ASDA.

is there a big buyer in the wings that`s keeping the price from dropping further?
dexter.
aldwickk, what misinformation is that?

after my posts yesterday I decided to call a few people this morning, only to see if anything has changed with SEO. The answr was "NO". As I said yesterday, SEO has got "MAJOR PROBLEMS" with it's RF tray lidding technology. It is one thing having an encouraging trial but quite another when it comes to the "real world" of commercial operation. If I had invested in every company that has had a succesful pilot, I would now be sitting in a carboard box.

While I am here just look at PM1. He is the epitome of what Jim slater used to call the "penny share groupie". An anorak who puts his heart life and soul into following what is little more than smoke and mirrors. Just look at the thousands of reams of propoganda and mis-information he has spouted. As with faith healer followers, he will refuse to believe his delusions no matter what!

It's as simple as this, I believe SEO have a product that can "do a job", but I also believep that hit has one significant pitfall that will prevent any major from signing on the dotted line. That problem is RF interference that intermitently shuts a line down and creates erratic and unsafe plant production. It is highly probable that the likes of ASDA's lidders will have to make major changes that could cost millions to their faccilities. In fact one or to of these may have to open plants in completely different locations.

PM1, I noticed you did not answer my concerns yesterday or by email?? You will probably dress this up as a "minor problem" or paint a less than favourable picture of me, but my and my colleagues opinion is valued a little more than yours I think. Anyways, we shall see and we shall let the people decide!

I just hate the blind (or in tis case the"penny share groupie" leading the blind. Alot of people are going to lose alot of money from this stock me thinks and hard and stark lessons will be learnt!!

I think the poster might be Evil K

RF could cause interference with other machines, but todays EMC regulations
would not permit the transmission of RF interference. Therfore, the lidding
mchine would require some screening to prevent any external RF leakage.

aldwickk,
thanks for that. for a minute when i was reading it i thought it was your views!!!!
dexter

Is that a major cost problem?

FP,
Don`t you think SEO and Asda and the other trialists would have covered something as minor as interference?, don`t you get interference with your gadgets in your home from time to time, i know i do!. can you come up with evidence that this WILL happen.
dexter

Talking more of the share price, with the amount of sells vs buys over the past 3 days, and the placing of 38 million shares just this week, I imagine it will take a collossol hike in demand for these shares to push the price back up. Now the hype has died down somewhat, you have to expect that natural market forces will once again take over. Thanks SN

that 965k T trade is a buy from when the price dipped for a minute IMO
dexter

Its worth noting that although there appears to be a predominance of sells - (some of which are buys) - there have only been about 6.5m shares traded today (about 850k) - which is much, much lower than the previous 3 or 4 days.

I dont know what that means - but the volumes are considerably lower.

Baza

anyone got L2 ?

found these links on the other side.

TOMBSTONE - Try here :-
http://www.gov.mb.ca/labour/safety/pdf/bltn182.pdf

or here :-
http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/80107_33.html

The dishonesty behind that interference quote reported by Aldwick is mind-boggling. SEO have been a world leader in application of R/F for decades so would not make such a schoolboy error, while you must give credit to ASDA taking that into account in their trials. Nor can I agree with 12.825p (the placement price) not being a support level. Clearly considered as such by my broker. Any support level can be broken but is much more likely to produce a bounce. Volumes are relatively low this week as there were 150M shares traded last week or nearly 20% of the share capital, so price is unlikely to move much until the volume picks up; plenty of warning so the MMs will not be caught short of stock, I doubt. Filthy Poor: thanks for refuting the interference nonsense but your comment about an sp of 6.5p doesn't make sense. You can't just look at a chart: you have to take account of the fundamentals; in this case including the ASDA trials. There is also the comment that analysts forecasts can't be relied on, but that is how they build their reputation; added to that, in this case, Evolution quoted management figures, so it is effectively a preview of forecasts which should be unveiled as part of the Prelims. Peel Hunt, the house brokers, will have quoted up-to-date figures in the recent placing. The accounts themselves, being for the period to end October, will not show much build up of revenue but, based on my recollection of the Interims, they will be reasonably explicit about current trading and forcasts.

Put my money where my mouth is - CFD for 125K shares at 13.15p.

Eric

dexter
I didn't say either of the two parties had not already thought about this,
I was mearly adding some fact to alwickk's post 1492.
So, get off your soap box, before you fall off.

All industrial, electro-mechanical machinery has to comply with the following
regulations:-

BS EN 50081 Emissions standard and
BS EN 50082 Immunity standard.

Simply, they must not emit any interference which may cause other machinery
to malfunction.Also they must be immune, within limits, to any such interference.

This is not the minor problem which you suggest it is, but, to reinforce my first statement, they have probably already covered this.

Aldwikk, FILTHY POOR, Dexter et al.

RF interferrance? simple! SEE Block Shield(BLS)!

FP,
I apologise, i read it wrong, aldwickk`s post was lifted from the other side.
have just stepped down off the soapbox!
dexter

EWRobson
6.5p solid support level.
12.825p weak support.
This company has a viable product, but its intellectual property
does not command a market cap. of >100m.
I have been known to be wrong...... I can't remember the exact occasion.
Hope your CFD pays off!

dexter
Its safer on terra-firmer.