If you're having any problems, or want to suggest some improvements, please post below!

Level2 changes
In the last few weeks we've needed to implement some code changes to make us compliant with the LSE's rules on the access of Level2 data.

The following requirement is now in place:
You can only use 1 program on 1 computer to access Level2 on MoneyAM using a single username.

This means that you are able to view as many Level2 windows using any one particular browser, or program, that you wish, however you will not be able to use both Firefox and Internet Explorer at the same time (the same goes for using Quote Tracker or TradeSeeker at the same time as viewing it using a web browser)

If you find you're being logged off of MoneyAM's Level2 with the message 'you've logged on from another location' then check the above and make sure you're not running any other programs at the same time before reporting this as a bug.

Message received, Haystack.

Kayak
When did you receive it? I sent it about 3 or more hours ago.

Just a few minutes ago.

The hold up appears to be at MoneyAM, here are the headers:

Return-path:
Delivery-date: Fri, 13 Dec 2002 21:48:54 +0000
Received: from host217-37-143-76.in-addr.btopenworld.com ([217.37.143.76] helo=mail.citiwatch.com)
by buckaroo.freeuk.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #3)
id 18Mxfy-000Ewa-00
for ap@freeuk.com; Fri, 13 Dec 2002 21:48:54 +0000
Received: from www.moneyam.com (unknown [212.95.232.210])
by mail.citiwatch.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 269873AF62
for ; Fri, 13 Dec 2002 21:50:58 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=212.95.232.210)
by appserv1.moneyam.com with smtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 18MtLn-0000hC-00
for ; Fri, 13 Dec 2002 17:11:47 +0000
Message-Id:
From: bulletinboard@moneyam.com
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2002 17:11:47 +0000
To: undisclosed-recipients:;
X-Envelope-To: ap@freeuk.com
X-claradeliver-Version: 4.15.0
X-UIDL: 1039816134.57453.buckaroo.freeuk.net
X-RCPT: ap
Status: U

In fact I sent it about 5 hours ago. Wonderful things computers.

This is probably the free delayed service.
The real time message service will be chargeable.
!??$%^&*()_+{}:@?/.,?;][=-?

Must put some fresh batteries in the mail server. We will take a look Monday;-)

PLEASE put a "Back to List" button at the bottom of the thread as well as at the top.

dcb

As mentioned earlier in this thread being a crap speller I use Word frequently to type out a long post.
However when I cut and paste to here a few of the symbols come out as ?

The ones I have found so far are " ' which all come out as ?

They are obviously ok when typed directly into the message box but cut and paste from Word no way.

O and of course the pound sign not in any format
M
??

Fresh batteries in the mailserver???

Now that etrade are closing the BB, I hear that the hamster's going for a song. Sure beats Duracels.

Martin - have you checked the language setting in Word?

dcb

DCB
I have it set to UK English as defualt.

Martini - u sure?

That doesnt look like UK English spelling of 'default'.

Gausie

swine :)

Am I right in thinking that once you use the &ltOL&gt &ltUL&gt &ltli&gt for bullets and paras that the font changes at this site ? Weird eh ? See it on this thread. HERE

How about changing the colour of all the threads about beta testing the new site to red, so that they can easily be found

The 1 day chart on the quote page does not have the previous day for comparison also does not show a price if no change.

On the research page all bar the 1 week low are showing zero.

My first look at this site - and it looks good.

I guess this has been mentioned above (can't be bothered to trawl through all the posts) but I think it's essential to have the option to display INTRADAY CHART DATA over several days. E.g. choice of 1,2,3, 5 and 10 days worth of 1,3,5,15,30, and 60 minute data would be great. The 10 day option would also give you a small competitive ADVANtage over a certain other site I could mention...

I am not keen on the stockwatch page. The font is pretty small and a bit difficult to read. I prefer the ADVFN version, but maybe a compromise might work. It is the vertical height of the font that is the problem. there is too much background and it swamps the font.

Haystack: Prefer ADVFN! -- haven't you been banned yet? You have mail.

Derek (IST and MoneyAM)