ainsoph
- 23 May 2003 13:32
A new thread that may swim in hibernation for a few days or weeks as the process of evolution takes place ......
Imagine a slimmed down debt free company with one division stacked with orders and self financing with cash in the bank.
Then imagine a partner for the other division with pockets so deep that they could fund a rocket to the moon ..... and back
Dreaming of course but Tads can do that to you ..... what a gem or is that a bygone dream as well .....
ainsoph
We started the day at 4.75p mid - risk grade 583 - currently 6p - spamming posts 63 out of 140
dickdasterdly10000
- 27 May 2003 08:04
- 151 of 729
Morning
Mr Bullshare - care to confirm who you have got rid of for reference?
Densil
- 27 May 2003 08:05
- 152 of 729
A very positive looking chart combination this morning.
A very positive start to the trading too.
Bullshare
- 27 May 2003 08:08
- 153 of 729
Dick:I am happy (actually not happy)to confirm that so far Censor(NE0), Bunnyboiler and Ainsoph have been removed. Others may well follow.
All:There are no winners in this so let's not have any of the 'well he got banned' nonsense. The fact is we,MoneyAM, are bored rigid by the abuse. In future we will not be very tolerant.
dickdasterdly10000
- 27 May 2003 08:09
- 154 of 729
Fair enough
Not Sure I agree will all of those but have a good day anyway
iago
- 27 May 2003 08:27
- 155 of 729
Bullshare
What a shame you didnt just edit the abuse as it arrived, this way, after a few days the lunatic fringe would get the message and go vent their bile elsewhere.
Methinks you have thrown the baby out with the bath water here, and have possibly now killed this thread.
all IMHO---IAGO
dickdasterdly10000
- 27 May 2003 08:31
- 156 of 729
iago
I have to agree
rjs
- 27 May 2003 08:32
- 157 of 729
this is typical.
moneyam have done the right thing all round. I popped in over the w/e to have a look. See if there was any news etc...of course there wasnt!! and the thread was totally unreadbale due to "both sides" actions.
Today we are up 20% and climbing and the discussion is on the rights and wrongs of these bannings.
Like Bullshare says, they made plenty of warnings and if "they" didnt take heed, then unlucky.
>iago - death of the thread??? its the start of it IMO.
dickdasterdly10000
- 27 May 2003 08:33
- 158 of 729
rico
will you sell now please as you can get more than you wanted?
Beau62
- 27 May 2003 08:33
- 159 of 729
Can only agree rjs.
rjs
- 27 May 2003 08:36
- 160 of 729
>dd, not just yet..its getting exciting ;-) there must be some news around the corner.
Densil
- 27 May 2003 08:36
- 161 of 729
I think they had to do something since it was getting silly.
I think Ainsoph, a great poster, just couldn't leave it to the monitors to deal with and insisted on responding himself.
As for the spammers, nobody's going to miss them.
I thing they'll all be back soon enough.
If Bullshare set up a filter and zapped out the personal posts or even just the abusive ones, we'd probably get along just fine.
Nice to see TAD breaking out this morning despite all the petty squabbles and, if anything delivers the coume-uppance to the spammers, itll be this.
dickdasterdly10000
- 27 May 2003 08:40
- 162 of 729
have to say i don't agree but oh well
price down a tick
due to real selling/profit taking or just a ploy?
time will tell
Andy
- 27 May 2003 08:40
- 163 of 729
Bullshare,
Yes well done, the Traders Room had actually become a personal battleground, and something had to be done before only the combatants were left!
It had got to the ridiculous stage where posts were being cut and pasted BETWEEN this BB and " an AM competitor"!
You definately need a "super squelch" button that you can apply between 2 posters as soon as a personal battle develops, this would save so much tedium for the other posters.
I would have thought that anyone looking in this BB for the first time would propbably have never returned after just reading the TAD thread, which was always at the top, and therefore, quite likely to be the first one they would select.
rjs,
Good post, I agree entirely.
I feel that now this is hopefully over, we can return to share talk, and yes, why is TAD up so much today please?
Andy.
Densil
- 27 May 2003 08:53
- 164 of 729
Not up quite so much now as the profit takers move in to consolidate earlier trades. The question now is: Is there enough strength in the sentiment to trigger off another round of buying and make them all step in again?
The rumours of a large investment from a software partner have yet to take on any flesh but they still persist.
dickdasterdly10000
- 27 May 2003 09:04
- 165 of 729
i told you to sell rico
;-)
rjs
- 27 May 2003 09:23
- 166 of 729
>DD,
Nah, I think the game is afoot now.
Also - never would have got the volume away at the time.
I'm happy though.
dickdasterdly10000
- 27 May 2003 09:24
- 167 of 729
;-)
ho hum ho hum
rjs
- 27 May 2003 09:27
- 168 of 729
this reminds me of the good old days - when we'd only just had an 80% fall ;-)
Clarvis Spicer
- 27 May 2003 09:40
- 169 of 729
I see that there has been a clean up of the board then.
Being an inexperienced poster, I was surprised when two weeks ago one of the moderators confirmed that posters on both sides had multiple log ins, have these been banned now as well.
Perhaps in the interests of fairness we could be told what other names won't be appearing.
I was most concerned at the time that I learnt this, as winning in the markets is hard enough at the best of times without deception from fellow posters.
Let's hope that Tadpole will emerge now that the in fighting is finished.
Clarvis
dickdasterdly10000
- 27 May 2003 09:42
- 170 of 729
A perfect example of what can be achieved with the squelch button
Clarvis Spicer - 27 May'03 - 09:40 - 168 of 168 (Filtered)