Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

stanelco .......a new thread (SEO)     

bosley - 20 Feb 2004 09:34

Chart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Code=SEO&SiChart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Code=SEO&Si

for more information about stanelco click on the links.

driver's research page link
http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/posts.php?tid=7681#lastread
website link
http://www.stanelco.co.uk/index.htm


kimoldfield - 26 Feb 2006 23:14 - 15159 of 27111

It has been said, though I have not found anything to substantiate it, that news of the Wal-Mart link was leaked in the USA, which forced an early RNS here. I think we are all aware that results will be duff, could be wrong of course!! just what will SEO have in the pipeline though?! They must be flat out working on new ideas, why open a new R & D unit if not? It HAS to be good for all from here on!!! This is not a ramp, just the views of a loyal shareholder since 2003!

kim

kimoldfield - 26 Feb 2006 23:17 - 15160 of 27111

No info on the 200 target Biscuit, not until tomorrow anyway; if there has been a hold up I'm sure it had something to do with the overdiscussed, overlengthy and finally over, court case!!

kim

PapalPower - 26 Feb 2006 23:24 - 15161 of 27111

Market expectations are a loss of around 2m to 2.25m, so provided we are within 10% of these levels, then results are in line and will not cause any concern unless for some strange reason people were not expecting a loss of around 2.25m. With EK gone long on Friday, it will not be attracting many shorters first thing on results, so without any market shocks and a loss as expected in the region of 2.25m, then it should be going up this coming week on the progress update and outlook statements.

greekman - 27 Feb 2006 07:23 - 15162 of 27111

Well, no results yet. Looks like some of the media got it wrong, no doubt tomorrow for release.

greekman - 27 Feb 2006 07:47 - 15163 of 27111

It's been suggested that the results may still be today, release time at 1430 hrs to coincide with the Dow opening, re Walmart. I hope I am wrong but I can't see it myself. I think the impact on the Seo/Walmart deal would have to show huge figures, in the results to justify the decision.
But they may already have firm figures re the deal. If they have, a vast amount of work, figure wise has already been completed.
As said hope I am wrong as at 0700hrs on Tues I will be at about 50,000 feet, somewhere above Africa. ( Nice if Seo's share price joins me at that altitude ).

hewittalan6 - 27 Feb 2006 07:49 - 15164 of 27111

Captain Guide (not that I've any time for an arse like that) seemed certain of a 2:30 release, but I cannot see any point in that regardless of what the results contain.
Alan

ssanebs - 27 Feb 2006 08:34 - 15165 of 27111

if the information contains wal-mart related news then the relese would have to be simultaneously, otherwise invetors who are already trading would have an advantage over the us.

Bugz - 27 Feb 2006 08:43 - 15166 of 27111

AGM and finals are tomorrow for sure. Apparently the loss of 2.1M is spot on, but no real movement with actual orders etc. Its going to be another 'future' speech from Howard!

Sharesure, I have heard similar talk Re: Mcdonalds for this week, but it wont be mentioned in the results. However I bet it'll be delayed a tad-always seems the way!

greekman - 27 Feb 2006 08:52 - 15167 of 27111

Morning, ssanebs,

Not always, unless it will have a significant effect on the other companies shares, ( ie Walmart ) and without figures, it will have very little if any effect on a company as huge as Walmart. There are many instances of news being released where a company has a deal in the offering, ( without figures ) that are not released simultaneously by the other company, if at all. ( re the news on Friday, this was not released by Walmart, only by Seo ( unless i missed it ). As said if there are figures re any deal in the results then yes, I would agree with you, but I don't think there will be. Also as said, I hope I am wrong.

Oilywag - 27 Feb 2006 08:53 - 15168 of 27111

Bugz

How do you know that the loss will be 2.1m and that there is no real movement with actual orders (I assume you mean Greenseal and Starpol). Where do you get your info from that you base your statement on?

The oily one

ssanebs - 27 Feb 2006 09:00 - 15169 of 27111

can confirm from house broker that the results are tomorrow

greekman - 27 Feb 2006 09:04 - 15170 of 27111

Ssanebs,
Thanks re the confirmation of the result date.

Oilywag - 27 Feb 2006 09:05 - 15171 of 27111

ssanebs

Did they say whether they would be released at 7.00am of at 2.30pm?

The oily one

Bugz - 27 Feb 2006 10:10 - 15172 of 27111

Oily,

I shall rephrase - I have been led to believe from an acquaintance that the 2.1M expected loss will be just that. As I'm sure you'll understand, that is an opinion of his and that no price sensitive information would leak from this trustworthy board that are in place at SEO. Of course, this could be complete crap and they lost 10 million!!!!! Nothing is ever sure until its announced.

As others have mentioned the share might slowly tick upwards over the next few weeks, but it seems that the city is going to be looking for actual cash entering the books-many feel it is only when orders are confirmed that we'll be out of the teens.

the manageress - 27 Feb 2006 11:13 - 15173 of 27111

Where do we find info on what EK is upto.Does he have a website.
I'm a longtime holder of SEO.

driver - 27 Feb 2006 12:17 - 15174 of 27111

manageress
Apparently you have to subscribe to this site to find out what the evil one is doing.
https://t1ps.com/default.asp

EWRobson - 27 Feb 2006 12:30 - 15175 of 27111

Manageress: driver has given the reference. Costs 70 to 80 to subscribe. Editor is Tom Winnifrith who does his research well. You have probably come across Zak Mir who is a respected chartist. Tom chats to EK twice a week and the piece is quite entertaining. Helpful to know what Evil is up to as he gets a lot right but some wrong; loves to short but probably means at least as much when he goes long as with SEO on Friday.

Evolution forecast loss of 1.9m last month so 2.1m will be in line with market expectations. I saw the Wal-Mart annopuncement as both negative and positive: negative in the sense that one had hoped that they would be further along the line rather than just work being undertaken with an environmentally friendly group; positive in the sense that WM must be reading the ASDA work positively so that the longer term implications are very positive. I suspect that this stock needs to be played long and it seems that that is what EK is doing.

Eric

Bugz - 27 Feb 2006 13:32 - 15176 of 27111

Eric, I think you're bang on it-thats why we're not moving out the 20s - movement on getting big boys like WM to put in firm orders is taking ages-much longer than pretty much everyone expected. Hence the sp has taken a pasting over the last four or five months.

Presuming the above however, I'm finding it hard to have a clear opinion of how the market will react to it. I was going to add to my long position first thing this morning, however i didnt as I'm simply stuck on the fence!!

Taking the announced loss within market expectiations as Evo forcasted, what are others thinking? Up or down post results? My gut says up, but I'm worried that the market are going to take it all with a pinch of salt if no figures of future contracts are mentioned.

stockdog - 27 Feb 2006 13:52 - 15177 of 27111

Anyone know who's been buying / selling since the 28p peak - or even who currently hold sin any size? Don't recall (m)any RNS about institutions coming in, or for that matter reducing. So I assume those that were in have all sat tight. First big move north will likely come when one or more institutions decide to move in for the next phase.

Come to that, director's shareholding seem pretty meagre. Barrie Hozier has a large chunk and Ian Balchin 250k's worth - but what about all the others? Are they all catered for by the share scheme. There has been no new bui=ying anyway to my knowledge for over a year.

sd

greekman - 27 Feb 2006 13:55 - 15178 of 27111

Bugz,

I think you have hit the nail on the head re your comment' stuck on the fence'.
I think that's where most punters are. It has to be a case of wait and see.
Register now or login to post to this thread.