overgrowth
- 06 Oct 2003 22:47
David10B
- 02 Jul 2007 10:35
- 1516 of 2037
But my dear cynic there are so many questions to be answered---are we not hear to enlighten over the repetitive rampers?
Look at this thread it was dominated by AieH and his ramping before I came here--and he was happy to keep on doing so.
And please note how nasty the rampers become when challenged and slink away.
We have here the opportunity to lift the quality of these BB and bring about an indepth honest debate.
I may have verbal dysentry but I also have a decent supply of soft smooth scented toilet tissue.
David10B
- 02 Jul 2007 10:38
- 1517 of 2037
PS I will keep harping on while the situation is allowed to exist under Worthigton over at BKE where directors are getting paid for nothing at the hareholders expense---that is obscene, as all directors have a duty to thier shareholders firsy.
beemer2
- 02 Jul 2007 10:42
- 1518 of 2037
Tenby lost a fortune on BKE....LOLOLOLOL
ptholden
- 02 Jul 2007 10:53
- 1519 of 2037
Thrush
So, you are the saviour of this thread by your continual 'bashing' of COH - LoL.
Actually, what is very apparent is that it is not COH on which you are bearish but Worthington and any company he is associated with.
I'm afraid you will never be able to 'lift the quality' of any BB, purely because you know (by your own admission) nothing about the finanical markets. The reason no-one is answering your questions is because any argument you have put forth has already been torn to shreds by those with just a modicum of knowledge.
As Cynic has already said, you're a broken record with nothing new to add or worthwhile to say, give it a rest and come back when COH's SP is going down rather than up, at least then you can say 'I told you so'.
pth
cynic
- 02 Jul 2007 10:56
- 1520 of 2037
never gloat at misfortune of others .... i am sure you have done ur bollox on occasion too; i know i have!
beemer2
- 02 Jul 2007 10:59
- 1521 of 2037
cynic
I never gloat over the misfortunes of others..with this idiot I have to make an exception for obvious reasons.
AdieH
- 02 Jul 2007 11:03
- 1522 of 2037
Look just Squelch this idiot... you all know what his agenda is and IanT won't ban this muppet... Just squelch to try and return this board/thread to what is was before his appearance... COH is moving now with rumours and now info on moving into Romannia, we don't need his contribution to bring balance you've all stated we know what his agenda is... PLEASE SQUELCH...
cynic
- 02 Jul 2007 11:19
- 1523 of 2037
will just try to refrain from rising to the bait
by the way, is soemthing wrong with MAM as there seem to be effectively no trades here
David10B
- 02 Jul 2007 11:38
- 1524 of 2037
heheheheheheheheh I have noy stopped laughing this morning.
So its my favourite SNACK ATTACK WHO HAS SAVED THE BACON FOR COH.
Snack attack remember then the guys and went to show Worthington how to really buy in the EAST.
I have long stated that Worthington did not have a clue od real estate prices and that Snack Attack did, buying a whole working chain for the price Worthington paid for a lease.
I have told you all Worthington did not have what its takes...this proves it If he was any good he would not continue to dillute shareholder value.
PTH the reason why you dont answer my question is rather simpe---so let me do it for you. -------------
IT WILL SHOW WORTHINGTON IN THE VERY SPECIAL LIGHT THAT HE COMMANDS
AND GUESS WHAT-- YOU HAVE BEEN SUCKERED AGAIN AS I BELIEVE THAT WORTHINGTON MAY EVEN DUMP HIS HOLDINGS TO sNACK ATTACK AS THEY CAN MAKE WORK WHAT HE OBVIOUSLY CAN NOT!
LET 'EM GLOAT CYNIC AS I WILL GLOAT THE LONGEST.
David10B
- 02 Jul 2007 11:39
- 1525 of 2037
good morning ADIEH WHY SQUELCH ME, YOU MAY LEARN SOMETHING AS MY WORDS COME TRUE.
David10B
- 02 Jul 2007 11:47
- 1526 of 2037
Of course Gentlemen there is only one way for the SP now and thats down.
I TRUST THAT YOU ALL REALISE THAT.
beemer2
- 02 Jul 2007 11:53
- 1527 of 2037
YAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAWWWWWWWWNNNNNN
David10B
- 02 Jul 2007 11:58
- 1528 of 2037
YOU MAY WELL YAWN BUT SURELY YOU MUST REALASE THAT IF THERE WAS TO BE ANY DEAL DONE BETWEEN THE TWO THEN COH SHOULD HAVE BEEN THE BUYER OF SNACK ATTACK!
Ultimate Cynic
- 02 Jul 2007 12:19
- 1529 of 2037
Finally sick of 10B and squelched him, but had to squelch beemer2 as well. Nothing personal beemer, it's just that I can still see what the welsh muppet is posting through your posts so until you squelch him too I'm afraid you're squelched also.
The same goes for anybody else who replies to him.
AidieH, please don't respond to him cause I'd hate to squelch you too!!
UC.
beemer2
- 02 Jul 2007 12:35
- 1530 of 2037
AdieH
Can you tell UC we still luv him...
AdieH
- 02 Jul 2007 12:42
- 1531 of 2037
I've squelched David some time ago... Please lets just get back to COH, we have all invested in COH and we should be discussing that and not David... Regards
David10B
- 02 Jul 2007 12:47
- 1532 of 2037
SURELY WE ARE DISCUSSING COH!
ITS YOU GENTLEMEN THAT TEND TO GET PERSONAL NOT ME.
beemer2
- 02 Jul 2007 12:50
- 1533 of 2037
AdieH
Apparently a poster on iii had contact with RW over the weekend was happy with his reply.
AdieH
- 02 Jul 2007 13:12
- 1534 of 2037
beemer it was me... yes he obviously cannot say too much but he thought COH was oversold on EMPIK news and he says we should focus on who has picked up stock...
David10B
- 02 Jul 2007 13:13
- 1535 of 2037
BUT HOW COULD WE HAVE FOCUSED ON WHO PICKED UP THE SHARES WHEN THERE WAS NOT THE STATUATORY NOTICE GIVEN?