cynic
- 22 Jan 2007 14:27
red = 25dma
green = 50 dma
black = 200 dma
The Telegraph says the banks like Southern Cross Healthcare, and so it seems to have an almost endless supply of new capital. It recently secured �300m to fund acquisition plans. It also develops its own sites and hopes to add 1,000 beds this year. A good operator with a proven model, Southern Cross is well worth buying.
annual reports etc available from www.schealthcare.co.uk
have just bought for myself at 355
halifax
- 06 Jan 2011 14:25
- 152 of 183
shorters have them by the.....
cynic
- 06 Jan 2011 14:25
- 153 of 183
indeed it does, though i guess there's a chance that some white knight will happen along
aldwickk
- 06 Jan 2011 17:33
- 154 of 183
cynic
- 06 Jan 2011 18:05
- 155 of 183
now we know what you do - proposition MILFs
mitzy
- 18 Jan 2011 13:55
- 156 of 183
I'm long.
Bid rumours 35p.
cynic
- 18 Jan 2011 14:00
- 157 of 183
if a bid truly comes in at 35p - in itself a poor reason to buy - your upside is currently only about 5p - inevitable discount for uncertainty and timing issues
mitzy
- 20 Jan 2011 22:26
- 158 of 183
Good days action.
mitzy
- 08 Feb 2011 08:25
- 159 of 183
Back to 15p again.
mitzy
- 14 Mar 2011 08:29
- 160 of 183
?????
cynic
- 14 Mar 2011 10:07
- 161 of 183
Southern Cross crucified!
company is dead in the water - read RNS put out this morning
mitzy
- 14 Mar 2011 10:24
- 162 of 183
Not much further to fall.
cynic
- 14 Mar 2011 10:40
- 163 of 183
aldo - post 149 - if what you wrote was correct, then i'm glad i'm not your bank manager ...... at least mitzy only invests 500 at a time (i think)
mitzy
- 14 Mar 2011 14:53
- 164 of 183
I fear nothing left for small investors
hlyeo98
- 02 Jun 2011 15:08
- 165 of 183
Time to buy SCHE... very cheap now.
Elderly campaigners, charities and union leaders warned that the threat of collapse at Southern Cross Healthcare would be a catastrophe that could threaten the lives of residents at its 750 homes.
In response, Downing Street offered a guarantee that elderly and disabled people in Southern Cross homes would not lose out, but declined to say whether any emergency funding would be available.
The crisis comes as the public spending watchdog, the Audit Commission warns that the quality of services for elderly people will be under further threat as councils are forced to negotiate lower fees for private care places.
Southern Cross, which made a 311 million loss in the six months to the end of March, has blamed its problems on reduced council spending on long-term care. The group announced this week that it will be forced to cut the rent it pays to the landlords of the homes it runs by 30% for four months.
Saga, the over-50s group, called on ministers to draw up an urgent rescue plan for care homes in trouble. Ros Altmann, Sagas director general, said: The government and local authorities may have to step in and take control of the situation.
Lives could be at risk as a result of Southern Cross collapsing.
The GMB union, which has around 12,000 members working in the care homes, urged politicians across the UK to take action to help secure the future for the staff and the residents.
General secretary Paul Kenny said politicians must sort out the uncertainty the residents face. These are not factories facing closure, they are a vital part of the social fabric of every community, he said.
The Prime Ministers official spokesman gave a guarantee that affected residents would not lose out.
We are clear that we are putting the interests of residents at the top of the list, he said. It may well be in their interests to keep them in the same place. But I think we have to look at that very carefully and we have got to let this process continue with the company and the various other interested parties.
However, he declined to discuss whether there was any contingency in care budgets to cover extra costs. Southern Cross is in talks with its landlords, who could force the group into deeper trouble if they refuse to agree to the rent cut.
Jamie Buchan, chief executive of Southern Cross, said he believed the company would survive, with fewer homes, but there would be no need for a government bail out. He told The Daily Telegraph: I dont think the Government would or would need to provide financial support.
mitzy
- 02 Jun 2011 16:10
- 166 of 183
Worth 2p or 3p at the most.
skinny
- 02 Jun 2011 16:15
- 167 of 183
God - these were 6 3 years ago and perceived as safe!
mitzy
- 02 Jun 2011 16:17
- 168 of 183
I remember SCSW tipping them at 400p and look at them now.
I bet a few people have lost their shirt
cynic
- 02 Jun 2011 17:10
- 169 of 183
at least when i started this thread there was still plenty of upside!
skinny
- 02 Jun 2011 17:12
- 170 of 183
Cynic - its quite funny when looking at the chart in the header, coupled with the last line of your opener. "have just bought for myself at 355"
cynic
- 02 Jun 2011 17:39
- 171 of 183
indeed - forgot it updated automatically!