Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

stanelco .......a new thread (SEO)     

bosley - 20 Feb 2004 09:34

Chart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Code=SEO&SiChart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Code=SEO&Si

for more information about stanelco click on the links.

driver's research page link
http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/posts.php?tid=7681#lastread
website link
http://www.stanelco.co.uk/index.htm


kimoldfield - 01 Mar 2006 10:51 - 15326 of 27111

Possibly nothing to do with sealing sd, could be just biodegradeable boxes/packaging - get rid of those piles of MacD rubbish lying in the hedgerows!!

kim

stockdog - 01 Mar 2006 11:03 - 15327 of 27111

Kim, so why need 500-600 machines (which I took to mean G/seal m/c's)?

kimoldfield - 01 Mar 2006 11:16 - 15328 of 27111

A possible misunderstanding sd, I remember reading 2/3 years back that MacD were interested in bio boxes to put their burgers in. The 500/600 machines could relate to Wal-Mart suppliers, or another possibilty, products need packing before delivery to MacD so maybe GreenSeal would be used by their suppliers.

kim

hewittalan6 - 01 Mar 2006 11:35 - 15329 of 27111

That seems eminently possible for their range of salad type offerings. McD do have a brand that demands everything is identical, and to package salad type meals at a central point and then ship may appeal to their philosophy. The idea of lasting longer would make huge headway into their delivery costs.
alan

kimoldfield - 01 Mar 2006 11:44 - 15330 of 27111

McD are introducing new packaging in Turin for the Olympics, showing nutritional value, maybe it will coincide with new bio food trays!?!
kim

barney12345 - 01 Mar 2006 11:48 - 15331 of 27111

Without wishing to be negative, are we talking UK or US billion. I guess US. In that case really saying 150 million trays not 1500 million trays. Say they pay us 1 cent per tray which is very unlikley, that is 1.5million dollars or 900,000.

Is my maths correct??

Still holding since 3p

kimoldfield - 01 Mar 2006 11:50 - 15332 of 27111

Amongst McDonald's suppliers we have Kraft, Con Agra Foods and Tennessee Bun Company, who last year were awarded a new $20m contract by McD, as a result of which they took on another 100 employees and spent $6.5m extending their manufacturing space. Lots of people to pack lots of stuff into lovely Starpol type packaging!
kim

hewittalan6 - 01 Mar 2006 12:12 - 15333 of 27111

edit

kimoldfield - 01 Mar 2006 12:28 - 15334 of 27111

There was also a historical difference between billions, trillions, and so forth. Americans use "billion" to mean one thousand million (1,000,000,000), whereas in the UK, until the latter part of the 20th century, it was almost exclusively used to mean one million million (1,000,000,000,000), with one thousand million sometimes described as a "milliard", the definition adopted by most other European languages. However, the "American English" version has since been adopted for all published writing, and the word "milliard" is obsolete in English, as are billiard (but not billiards), trilliard and so on.
Nevertheless, the majority of people have no direct experience with manipulating numbers this large, so a significant proportion of international readers will interpret "billion" as 1012, even if they are young enough to have been taught otherwise at school. For this reason, defining the word may be advisable when writing for the general public. However, all major British publications and broadcasters, including the BBC, which long used "thousand million" to avoid ambiguity, now use "billion" to mean thousand million.

Um, does this add confusion?
kim

Ted1 - 01 Mar 2006 12:30 - 15335 of 27111

I have dipped me toe today gents.
Interesting debates would be nice to see
some good news in the next 6 months.
Ted

barney12345 - 01 Mar 2006 12:32 - 15336 of 27111

yes alan but do we mean 150 million trays or 1500 million trays, cos using my generous 1 cent per tray royalty that is 1.5 million us or 15 million us or 900k sterling or 9 million sterling.
sorry seen you have edited

hewittalan6 - 01 Mar 2006 12:37 - 15337 of 27111

Barney.
If you work from the tonnage and 50gm trays it works out at 1500 million.
Alan

kimoldfield - 01 Mar 2006 12:38 - 15338 of 27111

Barney, I will add to my list of questions to SEO how they interpret 'billion'. I'm still waiting for a phone call from them!
kim

hewittalan6 - 01 Mar 2006 12:38 - 15339 of 27111

Just to explain.
50gm per tray.
20 trays per kilo
1000 kilos per tonne
20000 trays per tonne
75000 tonnes = 1500 million trays.
Alan

kimoldfield - 01 Mar 2006 12:38 - 15340 of 27111

Alan, I agree with that.
kim

kimoldfield - 01 Mar 2006 12:40 - 15341 of 27111

Ted1
Welcome aboard, good luck with your investment.
kim

garyble - 01 Mar 2006 12:41 - 15342 of 27111

Barney,

Don't think the UK/US billion matters, its the Tonnage of starpol which is key {~75,000 tonnes @ ~$2,000 per tonne} now was that a US ton or a UK tonne???

hewittalan6 - 01 Mar 2006 12:45 - 15343 of 27111

Metric tonne. All the notes these days are in metric. thats why the trays are measured in grammes (50) not ounces (2).
Alan

garyble - 01 Mar 2006 12:46 - 15344 of 27111

Tongue firmly in cheek alan!

hewittalan6 - 01 Mar 2006 12:47 - 15345 of 27111

Is that a UK tongue or a US tung???
Register now or login to post to this thread.