bosley
- 20 Feb 2004 09:34
andysmith
- 17 Feb 2005 21:33
- 1533 of 27111
Bosley, glad to see an SEO backer amongst all this. Also thought nice one Mr Watson, I believe ten fold is possible for 3-4years time but can see 50p-100p by this time next year. The progress will increase in rapidity as earings come in. Hope sp stays this low whilst I free up more funds!! I'm not good enough to risk trading so I'll stick to topping up on the dips, the decision to log-on and top up on New Years Eve at 5.45p is the best decision I have made so far.
Strange two weeks for us long-term holders.
bosley
- 17 Feb 2005 21:45
- 1534 of 27111
its been a wonderful two weeks , andy . maybe thats why the longer term holders arnt shitting bricks. i would have liked to have traded , just to increase my holding , but i dont have access to a pc during the day, at the moment, so i wasnt risking it.good luck to adieh, hope it works for you. my gut feeling is that tommorrow we will end the day blue; friday usually ends blue for seo.
stockdog
- 17 Feb 2005 21:59
- 1536 of 27111
good to hear you, Bos - even if I have had to wait up for you to get home
If you can't get to a PC to trade during the day, give AS and me the dosh and we'll place it for you for a small cut of the profits. All on blue!
SD
bosley
- 17 Feb 2005 22:25
- 1538 of 27111
lol@stockdog. sorry to keep you up :)i think i will pass on your business proposal.... unless you guarantee returns similar to those seen upto monday .
driver , yes you did
FILTHY POOR
- 17 Feb 2005 22:59
- 1539 of 27111
EWRobson
Seem to have rattled your cage!
With regard to RF interference (Ref your post 1520) I didn't raise
the subject in the first place.
Support levels - You say 12.875p - I say 6.5p.
End of story!
I have no hidden agenda and do not short stocks!
What is the point of this BB if anything less than "SEO is wonderfull"
is said, is just trashed. Does this board only accept positive comments.
I think the downsides should also be debated so that a more reasoned
investment strategy can be adopted rather than the one sided approach
that some of the "genuine investors" appear to have on this thread.
Anything I say on here will do Ziltch to the share price.
Anything I have said on here has not been derogatory.
Seine
- 17 Feb 2005 23:15
- 1540 of 27111
looterz! charters are self entertainerz...lying is the truth...the more you lie...the more it become truth...
the share is called Stanelco (Ord 0.1 Pence each)..the support shoul dbe 0.1p...
so how big you think it could be in da future?
stockdog
- 17 Feb 2005 23:42
- 1541 of 27111
Right with you there Seine, just up to that last bit after looterz. I understood that bit.
SD
bosley
- 18 Feb 2005 07:06
- 1543 of 27111
morning all.
jeez, driver, what time do you start work????seine....as cheese. filthypoor, negative is ok , pointless isnt. debate is good but whats the point in bringing up interference when it isnt an issue. your concerns about the cash issue and impending damages thing with bprg are valid concerns for you. for myself and others they are not .
AdieH
- 18 Feb 2005 08:08
- 1545 of 27111
Well put Dynamite, alot of bad feeling in here it seems, as you say everyone has to have their own agenda, mine is to make profit, either short, med or long term...
bosley
- 18 Feb 2005 08:11
- 1546 of 27111
well said, that girl! quiet start today. infact quiet start for everything i got on my watchlist. see you tonight, looking for blue.
jimmy b
- 18 Feb 2005 08:12
- 1547 of 27111
Think i may get back in at this price(,sold at 16p, ) this looks like another good oppertunity to me,i think it may slip to the high 12 s, then im in..Jb
aldwickk
- 18 Feb 2005 08:19
- 1548 of 27111
Chinese investers take notice of SEO share price.
jimmy b
- 18 Feb 2005 08:33
- 1549 of 27111
aldwickk your a nutter.
FILTHY POOR
- 18 Feb 2005 08:49
- 1550 of 27111
bosley
Do you people not listen
I DID NOT BRING UP THE INTERFERENCE ISSUE.
andysmith
- 18 Feb 2005 09:11
- 1551 of 27111
OK folks, getting bored now with all the nit-picking, might start a new thread!!
Facts are that we all have opinions but they need to be backed up, when I have stated >50p I have backed up with an argument based upon future earnings whether people agree or not. Filthypoor is entitled to his/her opinion but just saying 6.5p support without reason may scare off new investors into making a loss unnecessarily. In fact, believe it or not, I think 6.5p might be right IF all the JC Latelys jump ship with losses, that will show buying on rumour/momentum rather than reasearching the investment. Will I give a damn? No I will not, if it happens and IMO it won't, I just take some more because nothing has changed, the technology works, it is backed by Asda and all we wait for now is ink on the paper and the sp will bounce back. Good Luck everyone but make your own decisions and don't get scared off by rumour/speculation. If you bale becuase the risk is too high for you I wish you well in other investments but consider keeping some here. Right at the start when I bought for 4p-6p I stated to friends/colleagues that this was risky but could make me a packet, now the risk is lower than ever and the chance of a good packet has never been higher IMO. Good Luck with your decisions.
bhunt1910
- 18 Feb 2005 09:24
- 1552 of 27111
At last - balanced views again - which is why I read this board.
I do not have lots of experience - I have done my research and it seems to be positive and a good bet for the medium/long term- but as a novice - I read this board avidly for other peoples opinions and factual input - good or bad.
But as a novice - it can be a bit scary 'cos I lack the experience of some of you guys.
I have a long term view - so am holding for the long term - but I did sell some at 14p - but bought back yesterday - which shows a certain amount of indecision.
My plea is for people to post info based on fact. If people have an opinion - positive or negative - then I like to see that opinion supported with fact so that I can then do my own research and reach my own conclusions.
The RF technology comment over the last few days seems to be an example of scaremongering not backed up by fact.
Well thats my opinion - I think this is generally one of the best boards around - lets keep it that way - with fact please
Baza