Bought a few of these as the news seems to be getting better and I am sure we have now seen the bottom

ains




Maelor Approved to Hold CE Marks


Maelor plc, the AIM quoted specialist healthcare products company, is pleased to
announce that its wholly-owned subsidiary, Maelor Pharmaceuticals Limited, has
been certified to hold its own CE Marks for medical devices associated with
sterile catheter irrigation solutions.


Maelor CEO Stephen Appelbee said:


'This approval is important because it will enable us to develop and launch our
own product brands using a Maelor CE Mark. This now allows us to accelerate the
launch programme of our range of sterile catheter irrigation solutions into
several worldwide markets under our own brand. Now that we have established our
certified status it will be a straightforward process to extend this to other
devices being developed from our pipeline.


It is also formal recognition that Maelor maintains the highest quality
standards in the development and manufacture of its products

Oh your wonderful, do you seek glorification on these boards... Shows what a shallow person you are if you get your kicks from a bulletin board... As I said and IanT also mentioned on COH keep the personal insults to yourself... and get your facts right.

Guys,

Lets nip it in the bud this time please?

Stick to the topic not fellow posters.

Ian

NP. Regards.

Hi Ian It was stopped as I agreed to with you and the BB---seems Adieh MUST HAVE FORGOT!

See Ian how he attacks then cries when answered.

I never mentioned him so why the negative post from him?

Could it be that I THAT CALLED COH RIGHT!

Anyway I will keep my word to you as long as I can reserve my right of free speech enshrined in law, to reply to insulting posts---but you wont get any initiated from me--thats a promise and obviously you can see that since your last intervention

I would genuinely like to see these BBs become the best most informed of them all.

Keep you eye on MLR the chart are showig that a possible and long overdue break out could be around the corner.

MLR's progress has been dissapointing since the results this could now be set to change.

Lewis Charles called for 20p last year----------------------------

Hope ur right David10B.. agree, it's been slow & painful progress but it should come good soon

SEEMS TO BE COMING NOW, GOOD VIBS FROM THE MARKET.

Spoke to Lewis Charles just now, and although they are now not the primary brokers, I made a good contact there when they were, they still feel MLR is, and I quote, a " grossly undervalued" opportunity.

Make of that what you will. I just added!

Must be the trade for 704 shares, less than 100, a stunning endorsement of your confidence in MLR.

Out of interest, what are the good vibs coming from the market? I would also be interested to hear your views on the impending chart breakout and the TA basis for your analysis.

pth

Over 125000 shareS traded today, more sells than buys price up .25p---can you read the market?

As previously stated many times here (again I ask if you can read?) I am not a TA person, I need help with it and get it on line) I am a Fundmental Analysist person who always looks to the bottom line.

Next accounts for MLR will show a really nice bottom line profit.

and the offer price just dropped... what did you get them for if you don't mind me asking ?

So less than 20k of shares traded and this is signficant. Do you want to know why the SP is up 0.25p today?

Strange though it may seem, I do not read your every comment with avid attention, becuase to be honest there is nothing you post that is worth reading. I like to take a balanced view and unfortunately it is inevitable that your continual ramps and deramps are part of the reading process. There isn't much point in 'squelching' you as this would leave your ramps unchallanged

It is also obvious from other threads that you know sweet fcuk all about fundamentals, never mind TA. In fact you really don't have any knowledge of the markets at all, but desperatley strive to give the impression that you do.

Anyway, you have made a very buliish statement re a chart breakout, if you don't know yourself why this is so, perhaps you can post 'the help' you must have had to form the opinion? Quite a simple request, or perhaps you would like to admit it was a ramp without basis?

So which trade was yours from the 'I have just added' comment?

pth

There then you have I know nothing!

But I do know my trade just went through.

I do know that I neither ramp nor deramp stocks, how could I if I know nothing?

I know absolutely nothing about the markets.

My broker told me as I clealy stated above there will be a TA chart break out. I really dont know why--again as stated above!

If you look you will see that rather more than 20k woth of shares have been traded today.

My brokers are brokers to our family, and have been for years. I take their comments as written in stone, if you dont wish to take advantage of that info---thats a prolem for you.

A chart breakout Is on the cards I have just checked back and been told the same--as I said, and have said here previously TO CYNIC I know very little, in fact nothing about TA.

HOWEVER I DO KNOW ABOUT COH AND DO KNOW THERE IS NO INTRINSIC VALUE THERE.

HAVE A NICE DAY I WILL GO AND WATCH MLR RISE AND TAKE THE RIDE.

Ah, saved by the delayed trade - LoL
Actually, for once you have been very honest and admitted you know nothing about the markets. Fair enough.
I'm afraid I certainly wouldn't take advantage of any information provided from 99% of the posters on this board, especially one who claims to have retired from education and constantly makes more grammar and spelling mistakes than a 10 year old! I'm not particularly having a go about your spelling (we all fall into the same trap) but more the credibility issue.
Who was talking about COH? This is the MLR thread, seems you are unable to refrain from your 'bashing' activities wherever you post.

pth

PS You don't seem very interested as to the reason for this morning's little rise, guess it must be the 'good vibs' coming from the market!

A typical cretinous reply to my trade do you think I hve a crstal ball--come on man grow up.

I dont not make grammatical or spelling errors.....the occasional slip as we all do yes as often speed rules.

My crediilty is high.

I will never refrain from exposing COH or Mr Worthington's actions.

I have a pile of supportive emails on this topic.

'I dont not make grammatical or spelling errors'

Umm, well there's two for a start and that's only one line.

You see that assertion just confirms you are living in a different world to the rest of us. The grammatical sense of your posts is probably in the bottom 10% on this board, yet you seem to think you do not make errors. I'm afraid this sort of behaviour reinforces my opinion that you are a complete waste of space. Oh and if you want some credibility, believe me, currently you do not (laughing stock springs to mind) take a screenshot of your 100,000 trade and post it on the thread. Then we can all see that your 'adding' was indeed a worthwhile investment, rather than the 704 shares you probably did buy (if indeed you bought any at all).


Rampity ramp

pth

PT ..... ur last post is not entirely fair, as well you know ...... by the way, surely only one grammatical howler ...... "don't not" is of course basic schoolboy stuff, but constitutes just one clanger, rather than two.

What ever it is that pleases you. Obviously it is not much!

If you were communicatively alert, you would realise that English is now a free for all in its presentation.

Obviously you are not so!

Well said Cynic I was trusting that he would have spotted that one, or was it two?

AH well makes the day less boring I guess.

THEN APPEALLING TO THE PEASANTRY DOES HAVE CERTIAN MEMORBALY FUNNY MOMENTS.

IT OBVIOUSLY HAS CUT HIM DEEP THAT MY BUY APPEARED JUST MOMENTS AFTER I HAD SAID THAT I BOUGHT.

10B .... rubbish! ..... all language moves and changes with time, just as it seems that now one may be different to rather than different from, though that still grates my ear, and gay and partner have totally different meanings and connotations from their origins ..... however, "free for all" in presentation is certainly neither correct nor even acceptable despite what government departments may try to say ..... that is why language students at university have to be taken back to basics before they can hope to understand the structure of other languages and their attaching literature.

I would agree with that, but obviously you dont follow CNN- totally different to the BBC even on the same news threads.

I think you may be on to something as gay certainly does imply a debased free for all.

And partner conjures images of the old west not not a loving wife.