for more information about stanelco click on the links.

driver's research page link
http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/posts.php?tid=7681#lastread
website link
http://www.stanelco.co.uk/index.htm

I hope you aren't relying on that to be your retirement day Driver, the government will have made retirement age 95 by then!!
kim

I come back to my initial point about the management, that is they need to concentrate on pushing the existing contract through with ASDA.

Without signifigant improvement in these numbers the city will lose confidence in this shares and my fears are that we will be then looking at 10p per share.

It is fine for them to be talking to WM and MCdonalds, but they need to show that not only can they win these contracts but convert them into profit making ventures.

It has been mentioned about the low hanging fruit being the priority at the moment, but i feel that we are in real danger of that low hanging fruit being rotten by the time it is delivered to the shops. This is why it is important that all the minor things surround this company are as professional as possible, and is hence why the website atracts so much attention.

I remain a long term holder at the moment, however if there are more delays with the Greenseal contract, I will review my position, as I believe patience is running low on this particular contract. To many broken promises will have a negative impact on the share price.

We have various RNS from the company on a wide range of topics, Greenseal, Starpol, Frogpac, Petalpack and the cigarette filters - they really need to convert one of these to give the city confidence. This is not a lack of patience, just a realism that if you keep giving good news followed by nothing substaintal to back it up, people will write you off as a serious player in the market. Its a bit like the centre forward who joins your club promising that he can score 20 goals a season, after 20 matches without a goal you bin him.

To stretch an analogy, would you really bin the centre forward??
If he was a star player who really could score 20 a season, I might look at whether the midfield was providing him with a decent service, whether the coaching staff were training him well, whether the manager was using the right tactics. Then, maybe, sack the bugger.
The analogy actually fits quite well.
In my daydream scenario earlier about WM mentoring SEO, WM are a wily old coach who has spotted a world class, but young and inexperienced striker in Starpol (Not Greenseal, for my money).
They know that with the right coaching, tactics and support, he is the next big money star. Just as Wayne Rooney playing for Frickley Athletic would score more goals and be worth a few grand, but playing for Man Utd and scoring less is worth 30mill +, WM are taking Starpol from the Sunday league to the Premier League, where it will take a while for this "striker" to adjust, and find the net. But it will be worth it.
The further I got in, the worse the analogy got, but you get my meaning.
I believe WM have spotted a rare talent, recognised it, and will now groom it for their own ends.
The realism applies to realising that in 12 months a company has gone from a good but unproven idea to possibly the 2 biggest corporate clients in the world wanting to buy their product. Realism is realising that it is a bit like FIFA (here we go with football again) asking my local pub football team to organise a World Cup for 2007!!!
I still say that if you had been offered todays position with SEO 12 months ago (WM, Asda, McDonalds, Coca Cola) you would have taken it gladly.
How our expectations change so quickly. Unless there is terrible news, I am going nowhere. SEO will organise that world cup, they will groom that striker, he will get 20 goals a season. Team tactics and coaching staff may have to make way, but it will happen.
Rome wasn't built in a day. Milton Keynes was. Give me Rome over Milton Keynes every time.
Alan

Dear All

I have to say, love you as I do, there is pretty high noise to signal ratio on this board and it's becoming repetetive and self-destructive in style.

Ten simple facts are:-
1) great IP, now rationalised via ooc settlement
2) 3 or 4 great channels of development towards commercialisation
3) 2 or 3 world leading potential customers in serious trials
4) Source of raw materials JV'd
5) Europe and USA approved for ALL foods - major
6) Means of manufacturing via JV's declared
7) Well-funded with unused credit lines established
8) Management structure and personnel developing in line with needs
9) I'm a committed long-term shareholder
10) SP more than doubled in a year - ignore the spike, that was investors' fault not SEO's

If you're bored go and bitch elsewhere. Higher volume does not make more interesting reading. This is the most testing time of any company at this stage - successful bringing to market. I have not looked recently, but last time I did there were a number of solid institutions backing SEO. I am sure they are more capable than mere speculation on a BB of direct interface with the management on all the issues you raise.

The point of investing is to make money without physical effort or too much time taken. So relax and stop giving yourselves a hard time. Then I would have more free time - from not having to read so much verbiage going nowhere.

best

sd

Prospector,

Regarding the ASDA conversions being pushed through. I dont think the recently announced 'tie-up' with WM would have happened if WM viewed the ASDA conversion progress negatively. I see the ASDA conversions as in effect being the WM trial. The announcement of the tie up some 8 months through the ASDA exclusivity period would suggest that WM are positive with progress or they wouldn't be talking to SEO.

Negativity with the conversion progress would appear to be confined to a few investors posting on BB's who have no inside knowledge and nothing to base their expectations of progress on. This wont affect the success of the eventual roll-out one jot. With new technology and innovation, it takes as long as it takes within a reasonable time frame. That time-frame is far from being unreasonable yet, IMO.

I understand your feelings SD, but isn't that what a BB is all about?
Personally I am more bullish than I have been in a long time, and this has been brought about, strangely, by the bearish comments I have read on here!!
You're right, the big boys get to talk to the management and find out what is happening, we don't. Our only option is to hypothesise and work out for ourselves what is likely or not.
Despite being a cynical old sod, I tend to be a little bit dewey eyed about SEO (God knows why) and it takes a poster to point out the possible negatives to me. Based on those points I go away and think (a long slow process) and make a judgement on that. I feel I make a better judgement for that process.
These are exciting times. The next RNS will probably be to announce the purchase of a new kettle for the staff kitchen, but it may be a massive JV for Starpol, a commitment for WM and Greenseal, a multi million pound ciggy filter sale, a signal to watch out for different packaging on Coca Cola or an announcement that McDonalds are going all green and environmentally friendly. Of course investors are going to make a lot of noise!
I respect your postings immensly, and I feel you too are very positive, but that needs tempering by the negative posts. It does for me anyway. Just to remind me that things can, do and will go wrong.
Alan

Fair enough Alan
Really just clarifying my own POV. I generally find that writing out ones thoughts and being prepared to publish them prevents one from harbouring cosy, woolly ones which clutter the mind.
See you at 1+ I imagine one day soon enough.
sd

No, Alan, the RNS re the new kettle has already been announced:-


Stanelco PLC
25 December 2005



Stanelco PLC ("Stanelco", "the Company" or "the Group")


CHAIRMAN'S STATEMENT

The Chairman and Board of Directors of Stanelco PLC are pleased to announce the delivery, sometime during last night/early hours of this morning, of a brand new, shiny kettle for the staff kitchen.

This information is provided by RNS (allegedly)
The company news service from the London Stock Exchange

To be serious, we can conjecture all day and every night, what we cannot do is force SEO to become superstars overnight; IMO however, that is what they WILL become in the now not too distant future - just a gut feeling. WM have not lost patience, nor should we.
kim

That is a classy RNS, Kim. Just my sense of humour.
You really brightened my day. thanks.
Alan

I seem to remember the next RNS announced that after a 3 day trial period it been succesfully filled with 0.989 litres of water and that hopes were high that 3 mugs of tea would be produced shortly........

I believe that an RNS is due on Monday, my inside info is that, due to the fact that one of the mugs had a cracked handle, only two were produced.
kim

The two produced were of an unacceptable strength and one didn't even contain the correct amount of sugar. There is also an issue with the milk not lasting the length of the trial but R&D are experimenting with starch based whitener.

I think the issue has been sorted Alan, apparently supplies department had bought the ingredients from somewhere other than ASDA

Kim
I will be long retirement before then if my PCM take's off.

Sd
I dont think your No9 I'm a committed long-term shareholder will make me add more SEO to my portfolio but I do agree with the rest
P.S what about the biodegradable corks that can be No 11

Stockdog
I have not looked recently, but last time I did there were a number of solid institutions backing SEO.

I am aware of the Howard White thingy but could you tell us of the others?

driver - I just wanted to make it a round 10 reasons!

zscrooge - you're right I shouldn't post unsubstantiated remarks. Does anyone have Level 2 to look at who the major shareholders are apart from Age of Reason who still owns about 24% from memory? I hope there are some! Please list them here if you find any.

as far as the kettle trials, I understand the biodegradable tea-bags have now had to be withdrawn. apparently their customers were spitting!

sd

Its some (cosmetic?) company in Wales, from memory (which isn't as good as in younger days).

Ah! found it (it was Richards and Appleby I was thinking of):-

Major SEO Shareholders
WHITE B ESQ 139,313,000 14.91
WHITE B ESQ 72,078,122 7.71
RICHARDS & APPLEBY LIMITED 60,756,666 6.50
BARCLAYS STOCKBROKERS LIMITED 45,461,134 4.87
SQUAREGAIN 31,800,950 3.40
* major shareholder data from 01/02/2006

Barclays & squaregain acting as nominees for clients.

Indeed.