Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

CFA CAPITAL - EXCITING YEAR AHEAD (DGT)     

SueHelen - 31 Mar 2004 10:42

Final Results Due In March 2005.

http://www.cityfin.co.uk
Trades over 450,000 shares are delayed in reporting by 1 Hour.

One of City Financial Associates (CFP's) main operating goals is to bring fledgling companies to the market. With the depressed stock market over the last few years many potential clients have deffered entry to the LSE. Markets have now turned and the reality of a sucession of new floatations is growing. CFP are well positioned to enjoy the rewards that will be benefited to them in this growing market place.

Why the EXCITEMENT - will here are the reasons why I think we're on a winner.

1) My motto is when it's comes to investing there are three things. Management, management and management. With any good investment - the management should be the driving force in a company. Can they cut the mustard, are they dynamic, do they have good contacts? I think so if you read the following profile.

Stephen Barclay, Executive Chairman

Stephen Barclay, aged 61, qualified as a Chartered Accountant in 1964 with Robson Rhodes before obtaining an MBA degree from Wharton Business School in 1967. In 1989, after a career during which he reorganised various companies, he established City Financial Associates Plc (formerly Clifton Financial Associates Plc) to provide corporate finance advice to small to medium sized private and public companies. In August 1998, City Financial Associates Plc was purchased by Talisman House Plc (now Seymour Pierce Group Plc) where he became group executive chairman. In December 1998, Talisman House Plc purchased an institutional stockbroker, Seymour Pierce Limited, where he became executive chairman. He resigned as a director of Seymour Pierce Group Plc and various other group companies at the end of March 2001 to found CFA Capital Group Plc. He is a director of a number of public companies including MICE Group Plc and Talisman First Venture Capital Trust Plc and is a governor of the London School of Economics and Political Science.

John Shaw, Executive Director

John Shaw, aged 54, qualified as a Chartered Accountant in 1975 with Touche Ross & Co in London. Subsequently he spent two years seconded to the Quotations Department of the London Stock Exchange returning to Touche Ross & Co to join the Corporate Finance Group until 1982. After a period as a sole practitioner, he joined Chase Investment Bank Limited in 1985, was appointed a director and founded the Equity Investment Group, formed to invest in unquoted companies. In 1990 he joined Henry Ansbacher & Co Limited as an Assistant Director of Corporate Finance. He started working with City Financial Associates Plc in early 1995 and was appointed a director in December 1996. He was appointed a director of Seymour Pierce Limited in December 1998 where he was initially Head of Corporate Finance and latterly Head of Private Equity. He resigned from Seymour Pierce Limited and various other group companies at the end of March 2001 to found CFA Capital Group Plc.

2) They have turned a 2 million loss into nearly a profit if you ignore costs for discontinuing operations - that some turn around.

3) With only small market capital of 3.83M it's feasible to suggest they could make a good profit this year as they have already got off to a good start signing more clients.

A profit of half million would give a pe ratio of 7.66

1 million a pe ratio of 3.83

1.5 million a pe ratio of 2.55

2 million a pe ratio of 1.91.

So it would only take a small profit to make this company super undervalued. Consider the possibility they could achieve a 2 million profit this year, which is the least, I expect, we could be looking at a share price of 7p. YES THAT'S 7P (An average p/e for the sector is 16.) Even with a profit of only 1 million that's still an upside of 3.5p.

3) Consider the fact that some of their clients pay their fee by way of giving large share holdings to CFP. All it would take is two or three creamy companies to give them valuable portfolio holding which they could cash in at a substantial return.

4) The IPO is sector has already increased three fold this year. More and more companies are coming into AIM and from abroad then ever before. Rules have changed where foreign companies can use a fast track scheme to get on board more quickly then ever before. I'm sure CFA Associates are well positioned to benefit with this increase in volume.

5) We could see a re-rating this year in this sector, which would be the cherry on the top.

I rest my case, to me this is a no brainer unless you want to wait for the next results for proof they have achieved profitability. If that's your cautious approach, fine but by then, you can then expect a much higher share price then now.

Major Shareholdings:
Stephen John Barclay 64,600,000 11.66%
Pershing Keen Noms Ltd 49,610,000 8.95%
John Richard Shaw 29,400,000 5.31%

RNS Number:9414C
CFA Capital Group PLC
15 September 2004

CFA Capital Group plc
Interim results for the 6 months ended 30 June 2004
CHAIRMAN'S STATEMENT

Highlights

* Nominated Adviser to 20 AIM companies - broker to 15 AIM companies

* Currently handling a number of AIM flotations and other major transactions

* Strong second-half order book - solid outlook for year

* Turnover for the period up 95% to #510,000 (6 months to 30 June 2003:
#262,000 from continuing operations)

* Losses before taxation of #58,000, (loss 6 months to 30 June 2003:
#208,000 from continuing operations)

* Currently recruiting to further strengthen team

Introduction
I am pleased to announce that CFA is now retained as Nominated Adviser to 20 AIM
companies and broker to 16 AIM companies. The company is currently working on a
number of AIM flotations and other major transactions, and as such has built a
strong order book for the second half of 2004. The fees generated by this
activity, taken together with our underlying retainer income and largely-fixed
overhead base, leaves us well-positioned for a satisfactory outcome to the year
as a whole.

Sharply reduced losses for the first half were achieved even though we had to
incur costs on two flotations that were not completed until July 2004 which
generated revenues of #225,000. These revenues were not recognised in the
results to 30 June 2004.

Turnover for the period nonetheless increased 95% to #510,000 (6 months to 30
June 2003: #262,000 from continuing operations), with losses before taxation of
#58,000 showing a marked improvement from #208,000 (6 months to June 2003 -
continuing operations).

Following the sale of CFA Securities Limited in 2003, CFA is now firmly focused
on servicing the needs of clients who are essentially AIM listed companies run
by entrepreneurs. We now have a team of eight, comprising executives and support
staff, providing corporate finance and broking advice. We are in the process of
recruiting further executives to join the team. This recruitment will ensure
client service levels are maintained as we meet the increasing demand for our
services.

In accordance with my statement on the results for the year to 31 December 2003,
CFA started the beginning of 2004 with a good pipeline of work and with a degree
of optimism that market conditions would enable these deals to be completed and
this was the case in the first quarter to 31 March 2004. However, in the second
quarter, in a number of cases transactions that we anticipated completing in the
first half have either been completed since the end of June or have been
deferred. This adversely affected our earlier expectations of financial
performance in the first half of the year.

Financial review
Despite these factors CFA achieved a creditable result in the first half.
Turnover was #510,000 (6 months ended 30 June 2003: #262,000 from continuing
operations), overheads (including plc running costs) were #609,000 (2003:
#458,000 on continuing operations) and the loss before taxation for the period
was #58,000 (6 months ended 2003: loss #208,000).

These results need to be seen in the context of our having completed the
flotation of Smallbone plc (admitted to AIM on 26 July) and Ragusa Capital plc
(admitted to AIM on 15 July). No income is taken into account in the period in
respect of these transactions, although a significant amount of the costs
relating to these flotations were incurred in the period.

CFA is now retained as Nominated Adviser to 20 AIM companies and retained Broker
to AIM 15 companies. Annualised recurring income currently totals over #340,000
representing approximately 30 per cent of total budgeted group costs, and we
anticipate that our level of retainers and this source of revenue will show a
significant increase by the year end. Our increasing base of retained clients
not only provides a source of recurring revenue but is also a prime source of
transactions.

On 27 May 2004 we announced a placing of 65 million new ordinary shares at a
price of 0.7p per share, to raise #441,340 net of expenses. As at 31 December
2003 the net assets of CFA Capital Group plc were #534,000. The impact of the
placing and the small loss in the period, has been to increase the Group's net
worth as at 30 June 2004 to #914,000, creating a sound financial base.

Current trading
We currently have a strong order book both in respect of a number of AIM
flotations and other transactions partially arising through our existing client
base. On the basis that we complete a good number of these transactions, we
anticipate a satisfactory outcome for the year as a whole.

Summary
On 31 July 2004, John Shaw stood down as a Director of CFA Capital Group plc and
all Group companies. John has worked with me for over 10 years and was a founder
shareholder of the Company in 2001. The Board thanks John for his significant
contribution and wishes him well for the future.

The Board also extends its thanks to the entire team for their efforts so far
this year.

draw?scheme=Colourful&startDate=31%2F03%big.chart?symb=uk%3Acfp&ma=0&maval=9&uf=big.chart?symb=uk%3Acfp&ma=0&maval=9&uf=big.chart?symb=uk%3Acfp&ma=1&maval=10&ufbig.chart?symb=uk%3Acfp&ma=1&maval=50&ufbig.chart?symb=uk%3Acfp&ma=1&maval=200&u

snakey - 29 Dec 2004 13:42 - 1572 of 1892

are we to look forward to Griffin reversing into CFP as they did with Cater Barnard, only to break away again ??? what`s in this deal and for who ??
I do sincerely hope it is all positive for CFp holders and the company.

samon - 29 Dec 2004 14:23 - 1573 of 1892

stephen dean?
which one??????
hopefully not the one that lines his own pockets at the expense of others!
wishing everyone a peaceful new year.
with love and peace to everyone everywhere.

EWRobson - 30 Dec 2004 01:44 - 1574 of 1892

taylormade

Important matters first! Just picked up a taylormade 580 driver at one-third the UK price in Vancouver! Set up for new season.

Thanks for Griffin post which I think is very relevant. Griffin seem quite complimentary to CFP, concentrating more on development, including funding. It seems reasonable that they will be a source of business and the share acquisition at least cements a working realtionship if not leading to an takeover. Is your reading that Rawlinson is close to Dean? May be a blessing that Barclay and Shaw are no longer in control. It may be, as sometimes happens, that Barclay had something to prove to himself in setting up CFP but realises that he is either past it or it is not really playing to his strengths which are presumably as a consultant rather than entrepreneur. I liked Rawlinson's reply. What do we know about him?. Is there anything in Samon's worry about Dean?

One difference between Griffin and CFP, I suspect, is that Griffin are more in control of their clients and therefore their revenue is less at risk. CFP appear to have a more administrative role. However, business via Griffin will presumably be less risky. The CFP announcement implies a positive raft of bubiness going into the New year so that 2005 has a very good chance of being profitable. If profitable, then the profits could start approaching the level for Griffin. happy to have bought another tranche today - yesterday for you folk.

Eric

EWRobson - 30 Dec 2004 08:31 - 1575 of 1892

That's another 2 mill. stached away. Come on, chaps, I don't think I can drive the price up on my own!

Eric

samon - 30 Dec 2004 21:52 - 1576 of 1892

Two threads on this share?
Is someone being mischievous?

gorwel22 - 31 Dec 2004 11:47 - 1577 of 1892

I already hold these (-),,PET(-) PCI(-) EPO(-)maybe next year a(+),anyway wishing you all A HAPPY AND HEALTHY NEW YEAR .doug

snakey - 03 Jan 2005 00:27 - 1578 of 1892

what`s with the Griffin SP @ 5.6 P/E ratio and profits etc increased exponentially from previous but SP remains static for last 8 months and no jump following,what would appear to be, great results in November???. Do the MMs know something that is not apparent to all of us ??

moneyplus - 03 Jan 2005 13:38 - 1579 of 1892

Could be-- beware of Stephen Dean!! I have held shares in his previous hot shot companies ART being one and only succeeded in losing money--he looks after himself first and last, shareholders are left out of pocket.

overgrowth - 03 Jan 2005 14:14 - 1580 of 1892

moneyplus - With the Griffin involvement in CFP, it looks as though this is a slightly different scenario.

Stephen Dean does indeed ramp up his "hot shot" companies and then sells out quickly, however he has previously made his strategy clear of Griffin not being a long term holder of any companies they promote.

Griffin investment in CFP is different, because they are using CFP as a vehicle to get the hot shot companies into the AIM index, whilst Griffin are free to ramp away.

In theory this should put a lot of new business in CFP's direction - just be wary of investing too early in the companies they will be acting as NOMAD/broker for.

moneyplus - 03 Jan 2005 15:35 - 1581 of 1892

Thanks Overgrowth--happy and prosperous new year to you. 2004 was a lot better for me with a lot of good advice from friends on this board and steering clear of ramps.

snakey - 05 Jan 2005 23:58 - 1582 of 1892

Interesting that Griffin issued a share placing today to raise 77,000 +/-.
would this have anything to do with our new, special relationship ??

overgrowth - 06 Jan 2005 00:06 - 1583 of 1892

snakey something's definitely going on in the background - did you notice that the placing was at a premium to their current shareprice ?

snakey - 06 Jan 2005 00:29 - 1584 of 1892

yes, and after they announced year end results for september holding 711,000 in bank alone, apart from nearly a million in tradeable investments. so how much does 77k buy you against that collateral??? but I suppose they don`t lose interest when it`s somebody elses dosh.

markusantonius - 06 Jan 2005 01:26 - 1585 of 1892

Held CFA (prev Abinger) for 3 years before coming out with a small profit, last year. Knew, at the time, that it was way overpriced based on fundamentals so this was obviously due to some kind of OTT promoting! No surrprises as shortly afterwards the shaare price began its slide to where it is now usually bearing a large spread, as well.

IMHO the price may very well soar ONE DAY but not for maybe 12 months+ and not to over a quid as one enthusiast predicts! The current price is about right I would say.

willfagg - 06 Jan 2005 10:47 - 1586 of 1892

Dear EW do you still feel upbeat about the short term prospects? Like you I have bought further shares taking adavntage of current low price.There is probably an equal split between positive and negative feelings on this thread. I hope we ahve got it right!

Ted1 - 06 Jan 2005 14:55 - 1587 of 1892

Still not a single trade. Some positive news is now required.
Quite before the storm??

taylormade - 06 Jan 2005 15:01 - 1588 of 1892

Very weird not a single trade.

markusantonius - 06 Jan 2005 16:11 - 1589 of 1892

So what do you all think about the SHORT-TERM prospects, then?

willfagg - 06 Jan 2005 17:10 - 1590 of 1892

I feel like we are basically starved of information and a little confused.CFP made a comment before Xmas that they acknowledged they did not always communicate well but they would correct this for the future? I wish when companies make these comments they realised their investors remember what they say and expect them to keep to their promises!
I cant remember who contacted them befor but a request for an update on behalf of their investors on this thread might be a way forward

snakey - 06 Jan 2005 17:51 - 1591 of 1892

I think we can look forward to some fireworks from next week which I hope are extremely lively and not damp squids !!! Griffin may make some further moves in our direction ?
Register now or login to post to this thread.