edited by moneyam

First week of May 2006....luk more closely.....shows close at 0.75 pence...intraday high was 1.00 pence.

There you go:
Date Open High Low Close Volume Adj Close*
10-May-06 0.62 0.50 0.50 0.50 50,000 0.50
9-May-06 0.70 0.60 0.55 0.55 156,153 0.55
8-May-06 0.70 0.75 0.60 0.73 301,299 0.73
5-May-06 0.46 1.00 0.50 0.73 6,170,300 0.73
4-May-06 0.35 0.55 0.50 0.55 528,736 0.55
3-May-06 0.32 0.38 0.34 0.38 1,191,904 0.38
2-May-06 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0 0.30
1-May-06 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0 0.30

http://uk.finance.yahoo.com/q/hp?s=DMR.L

So who ever listened to SueHelen did rather well on her recommendation to buy at 0.30 pence back at Christmas....300% profit within 4 months.....0.30 pence to buy again and expecting 1 pence again at the very least in the near future.

So here we have a company that has a zero turnover, assets in SA that are valued at 400k which they can't sell, from which the company receives a tiny royalty and no other income. Why on earth should the SP increase 3 fold? I guess Lala25-SueHelen and you are still stuck with some from your previous ramp. Anyone who buys this stock is raving mad. DYOR etc etc.

pth

Laila - Have you forgotten that you are suehelen? Why do you refer to suehelen as 'her'?

Why lie and mislead on the trivial things? Are you simply incapable of telling the truth?

We shall see. 2 pence soon.

ptholden.....u just bitter now when I found the data to show u that the price did get to 1 pencre......what a miss was that for you....

Laila25 aka Smiler28 aka Suehelen,

talk about being economical with the truth!!!

You take deceit to a newer lower level!!!

The lowest offer, and the highest bid show a maximum possible profit of 100%, nothing like the 300% you claim - what a total fraud!!!

Anyone buying at the lowest offer in May can now sell at a 50% loss!!!

Try selling some and see what they do to the offer!!!


You're locked in!!!!!!

2 pence soon....Aw my Gausie is deramping DMR here and on ADVFN and will do so all weekend.....getting desperate.

laila aka smiler28 aka suehelen,

If you really do own millions of these, my guess is that you are the desperate one, and Gausie is taking in the sun!!!

why do you refer to sue helen in the third person when it is you yourself???

Is that an honest and correct thing to do???

I thought not...

laila aka smiler28 aka suehelen,

If you really do own millions of these, my guess is that you are the desperate one, and Gausie is taking in the sun!!!

why do you refer to sue helen in the third person when it is you yourself???

Is that an honest and correct thing to do???

I thought not...

In your exuberance, aimtrader, you may have failed to spot La-La's claim (as he returned from suspension) in his initial post: "... the price did get to 1 pence in early MAY so a 400% rise for those who listened to SueHelen."

Why oh why do we all keep banging on about SueHelen's innumeracy and mendacity - and now his emasculation - when it's more interesting, and equally pointless, to delve into the subliminal significance of his multiple personae.

SueHelen/Smiler: mere senile lush
Smiler/Sadika: risk maladies
Optimist/SueHelen/Smiler/Laila: silliest hilarious empalement
SueHelen/Smiler/Sadika/Laila: alleluia! measlier skinheads
Optimist/SueHelen/Smiler: I'm the timeless repulsion

And he reckons Gausie is losing his marbles?

As tfhyla might say ... Oh! ... The madness ... the madness NOW!!!!!!

laila aka smiler28 aka suehelen,

If you really do own millions of these, my guess is that you are the desperate one, and Gausie is taking in the sun!!!

why do you refer to sue helen in the third person when it is you yourself???

Is that an honest and correct thing to do???

I thought not...

Sue helen's getting desperate, getting VERY desperate NOW!!!!!!

Smiler/Sadika/Laila: I am skilled as a liar
:o)

Sue helen's getting desperate, getting VERY desperate NOW!!!!!!

SueHelen (let's stop pretending - everyone knows who you are LaLa)

No I'm not bitter about being wrong that the SP did briefly touch 1p in May, although the Bid certainly would not have done so. Actually with a 50% spread you wouldn't have made much profit on this stock even if you had bought in at 0.30 (actually 0.50ish on the spread).

By the way, you didn't answer my question as to why this stock should go back to 1p (or 2p if you read ADVFN). It has nothing going for it whatsoever. The only reason you have resurrected this thread is an attempt to pump the stock in the hope of selling your locked in holding.

Hopefully, anyone reading this will see through your despicable attempt to lure the unwary.

Sour grapes and bitterness.......keep DMR on your monitor this time.....the price went up to 0.80-1.00 pence.....go and back and read all the deramping comments at the 0.30 pence price.

What a foobar was that by the derampers.....this time target price is 2 pence.

DMR went up to 1p in May, so your comment about this not getting to even 1p sounds a bit lame. Ramping does not encourage people to buy a share it simply highlights to them its existance. If the share is of interest, people will buy, if it is not they won't. DMR has been in a trading cycle for some time as long-termers accumulate larger holdings. When progressive news is finally announced, there will be so few shares in free float that price movement will be significant and a doubling of the May high of 1p to 2p is not out of the question.

to find a poor prospect takes months, to find a great one can take years...you can bet your bottom dollar Moritz and Hoodless have been looking for nearly 3 years now.......BANG

Sue helen's locked in, (s)he's locked in NOW!!